Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Prosthodont ; 0(0): 1-25, 2024 03 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38536147

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the adherence of three types of bacteria [Staphylococcus (S) aureus, Escherichia (E) coli, Pseudomonas (Ps) aeruginosa] and the size of the microgap of three different implant systems (JD, ORA, and Ankylos) under four different screw torque values. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten samples for each tested implant system were used under different torques to determine the width of the gaps. The abutments were connected to the fixtures using a universal digital wrench. A torque value of 10 N/cm was applied for all samples. After the assessment of the microgap, the fixture was repositioned into the Bench Vice, and the torque was increased to 20, 30, and, finally, 40 N/cm. The microgap assessment was done using a Scanning Electron Microscope. Before the torque increased to 40, eleven samples for each tested implant system were used under 30 N/cm torque to determine the leakage in the tested implants for S. aureus, E. coli, and Ps. aeruginosa. Data were analyzed with multiple one-way ANOVA, Post Hoc, and chi-square tests. RESULTS: The Ankylos system showed the widest gap under all torques (p < 0.005), whereas the JD system demonstrated the lowest (p < 0.005). Regarding the bacteria leakage, JD showed the highest adherence to the bacteria, and the adherence was mainly to the Ps. Aeruginosa, while the Ankylos system showed the lowest (p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: Within limits, the higher torque provides a higher fit to the IAI, offering more stability. Ankylos implant showed the widest gap, while JD showed the narrowest. Regarding the bacteria leakage, JD showed the highest adherence to Ps. Aeruginosa, while the ORA system showed the highest adherence to E. coli.

2.
J Infect Dev Ctries ; 17(4): 477-484, 2023 04 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37159882

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Enterobacteriaceae that produce extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) are quickly spreading, posing a threat to world healthcare. METHODOLOGY: 138 gram-negative bacteria were collected from different samples (stool, urine, wound, blood, tracheal aspirate, catheter tip, vaginal swab, sputum, and tracheal aspirate) from hospitalized patients. Samples were subcultured and identified in accordance with their biochemical reactions and culture characteristics. Against all the isolated Enterobacteriaceae, an antimicrobial susceptibility test was performed. VITEK®2 system, phenotypic confirmation, and Double-Disk Synergy Test (DDST) had been utilized to identify the ESBLs. RESULTS: Of the 138 samples studied, the prevalence of ESBL-producing infections among the clinical samples of the present study was 26.8 % (n = 37). E. coli was the commonest ESΒL producer at 51.4% (n = 19) followed by K. pneumoniae at 27% (n = 10). The potential risk factors for the ESBL development that produces bacteria were as follows, patients with the presence of indwelling devices, previous history of hospital admission, and usage of antibiotics. ESBL is statistically (p ≤ 0.05) higher among the patients with indwelling devices, ICU admission, who had a previous hospital admission in the last 6 months as well as who was given antibiotics (quinolones and/or cephalosporins) in the last 6 months. One hundred thirty-two (95.7%) of ESBL isolates were resistant to amoxicillin, while the lowest resistance was for fosfomycin (15.2%). CONCLUSIONS: ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae are highly prevalent in Turaif General Hospital setting with some potential risk factors. A strict policy to be made available on the usage of antimicrobials in hospitals and clinics should be established.


Subject(s)
Escherichia coli , Hospitals, General , Female , Humans , Prevalence , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology , Enterobacteriaceae , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , beta-Lactamases
3.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 13(2)2023 Jan 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36673116

ABSTRACT

Background: COVID-19 outcomes display multiple unexpected varieties, ranging from unnoticed symptomless infection to death, without any previous alarm or known aggravating factors. Aim: To appraise the impact of ACErs4291(A/T) and ERAP1rs26618(T/C) human polymorphisms on the outcome of COVID-19. Subjects and methods: In total, 240 individuals were enrolled in the study (80 with severe manifestations, 80 with mild manifestations, and 80 healthy persons). ACErs4291(A/T) and ERAP1rs26618(T/C) genotyping was performed using RT-PCR. Results: The frequency of the ACErs4291AA genotype was higher among the severe COVID-19 group than others (p < 0.001). The ERAP1rs26618TT genotype frequency was higher among the severe COVID-19 group in comparison with the mild group (p < 0.001) and non-infected controls (p = 0.0006). The frequency of the ACErs4291A allele was higher among severe COVID-19 than mild and non-infected groups (64.4% vs. 37.5%, and 34.4%, respectively), and the ERAP1rs26618T allele was also higher in the severe group (67.5% vs. 39.4%, and 49.4%). There was a statistically significant association between severe COVID-19 and ACErs4291A or ERAP1rs26618T alleles. The coexistence of ACErs4291A and ERAP1rs26618T alleles in the same individual increase the severity of the COVID-19 risk by seven times [OR (95%CI) (LL−UL) = 7.058 (3.752−13.277), p < 0.001). A logistic regression analysis revealed that age, male gender, non-vaccination, ACErs4291A, and ERAP1rs26618T alleles are independent risk factors for severe COVID-19. Conclusions: Persons carrying ACErs4291A and/or ERAP1rs26618T alleles are at higher risk of developing severe COVID-19.

4.
J Infect Dev Ctries ; 17(12): 1740-1747, 2023 12 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38252724

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The Ministry of Health in Saudi Arabia provides comprehensive antenatal care for all pregnant women with all required investigations. However, it does not include urine culture for diagnosis of asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB). This is the first study to evaluate the prevalence of ASB among pregnant females, identify the causative organisms and determine their antibiotic susceptibility patterns in the Maternity and Children's Hospital, Arar, Saudi Arabia. METHODOLOGY: This cross-sectional study included 400 pregnant women attending an antenatal clinic. Two midstream urine samples were aseptically collected and screened using standard microbiological techniques including microscopic examination, dipstick testing, and urine culture. In order to interpret the urine culture results, ≥ 105 CFUs/mL was considered significant bacteriuria. Identification of the isolates and their antibiotic sensitivity testing was performed using the Vitek 2 system (BioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France) with the available test kits. RESULTS: The prevalence of ASB was 8.25% (35/400). Significant positive correlations (p ˂ 0.05) were detected between positive urine culture results and random blood sugar, leucocytes, nitrites, pus cells, urine red blood cells, epithelial cells, and mucus. Escherichia coli was the most common causative organism (45.7%), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (22.9%). Klebsiella pneumoniae represented 11.4% of the isolates. Most of the isolated Gram-positive organisms were sensitive to many of the tested antibiotics; most of the detected Gram-negative isolates were resistant. CONCLUSIONS: ASB caused by antibiotic resistant organisms is alarming. Screening for ASB during pregnancy using urine culture and sensitivity testing is of vital importance to improve the maternal and neonatal outcome.


Subject(s)
Bacteriuria , Pregnancy , Child , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Female , Bacteriuria/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology , Drug Resistance, Microbial , Hospitals, Pediatric , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Escherichia coli
5.
J Infect Dev Ctries ; 16(6): 1037-1044, 2022 06 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35797299

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Saudi Arabia can be considered a hot spot for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections with significant regional variations. As far as we know, this is the first study to evaluate the prevalence of MRSA in clinical samples obtained from Turaif general hospital (TGH), Northern Area-Saudi Arabia, and screening the resistance profile to the most regularly used antimicrobials as an indicator for evaluation of the implemented infection control measures. METHODOLOGY: Totally, 410 Samples were collected from patients in TGH with clinically suspected nosocomial infections. MRSA isolates were identified by the classical bacteriological, biochemical, and cefoxitin-based methods as recommended by the Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute. Confirmation of isolates and testing of their antimicrobial susceptibilities were performed by the automated Vitek 2 compact system. RESULTS: Totally, 130 nosocomial isolates were detected. Staphylococcus aureus (29.23%) was the most frequently isolated Gram-positive pathogen. MRSA represented 39.47% of Staphylococcus aureus and 11.54% of all isolates. MRSA-causing surgical site infections were the most predominant type of MRSA nosocomial infections representing (25.00%). Recent antibiotic therapy, prolonged hospital stays, and indwelling devices were significant risk factors for the development of MRSA infections. Although all MRSA isolates were sensitive to vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid, Fosfomycin, and tigecycline, many isolates were resistant to other tested antimicrobials. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital administrators should strengthen the ideal use of antibiotics according to the local hospital policy to control the selective drug pressure on Staphylococcus aureus strains with minimizing exposure to the risk factors by implementing the proper infection control policies.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Staphylococcal Infections , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Hospitals, General , Humans , Infection Control , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/prevention & control , Staphylococcus aureus
6.
BMC Oral Health ; 19(1): 86, 2019 05 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31117990

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Candida is a ubiquitous organism in nature which inhabits the oral cavity as part of the normal microbial flora. The oral carriage of Candida is perpetuated by several predisposing factors. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was designed to investigate the carriage rate of Candida among 104 voluntary adults at the college of medicine - Jouf University. The concentrated oral rinse technique using Sabouraud Dextrose agar medium supplemented with 0.05% Chloramphenicol was used to isolate Candida. The relative factors affecting the colonization of Candida and the concentration of each type were also determined. RESULTS: Candida species were isolated from the oral cavity of 45 (43.4%) subjects. Of these 55.6% were identifies as C. albicans as determined by the Vitek 2 compact system. Other Candida species were represented by C. glabrata (11.1%), C. krusei (11.1%), C. dubliniensis (8.9%), C. parapsilosis (6.7%), C. tropicalis (4.4%), and C. famata (2.2%). Subjects with very poor plaque status, severe gingivitis and diabetes had significantly (P = 0.001) high concentration of Candida spp. CONCLUSION: Plague, severe gingivitis, and diabetes were found to be significantly associated with higher Candida colonization.


Subject(s)
Candida , Candidiasis, Invasive/epidemiology , Adult , Candida glabrata , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Mouth , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...