Mechanical Epithelial Debridement versus Transepithelial Phototherapeutic Keratectomy Followed by Accelerated Corneal Collagen Crosslinking for Progressive Keratoconus.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the visual and topographic outcomes between mechanical epithelial debridement followed by accelerated corneal collagen cross linking (CXL) vs. transepithelial phototherapeutic keratectomy followed by accelerated CXL for treatment of progressive keratoconus. STUDY DESIGN: Quasi experimental study. Place and Duration of the Study: Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology (AFIO), National University of Medical Sciences, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from December 2020 to December 2021. METHODOLOGY: On the basis of surgical technique used, patients were divided into two groups, Group A comprising of twenty eyes that underwent mechanical epithelial removal followed by accelerated CXL, and Group B comprising of twenty-two eyes that underwent transepithelial phototherapeutic keratectomy (t-PTK) followed by accelerated CXL. All variables were recorded preoperatively and 6 and 12 months postoperatively and included uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), MRSE (manifest refraction spherical equivalent), and keratometric indices (flat K, steep K, Kmax , mean K, thinnest pachymetry, KPI, K prob, CLMIaa, and I-S). RESULTS: Forty-two eyes of twenty-nine patients were included in the study and were divided into two groups; Group A (mechanical epithelial removal followed by accelerated CXL) and Group B (t-PTK followed by accelerated CXL). The visual acuity improved in both the groups at 6 and 12 months, with more significant improvement in Group B in both UCVA (p=0.005) and CDVA (p=0.004) parameters. Keratometric outcomes showed significant differences in median values for flat K (p=0.048) and thinnest pachymetry (p=<0.001) in Group A, while significant difference in Kmax (p=0.024) and thinnest pachymetry (p=<0.001) in Group B. At 6 and 12 months, the CLMIaa, PPK, and I-S values were significantly lower in Group B (p=0.002 for all three indices). CONCLUSION: Transepithelial PTK followed by accelerated CXL yielded better outcomes regarding visual acuity and keratomertic indices as compared to mechanical epithelial removal followed by accelerated CXL and did not show any significant decrease in corneal pachymetry. KEY WORDS: Mechanical, Corneal Collagen Crosslinking (CXL), Transepithelial, Phototherapeutic keratectomy, Keratoconus.

Comparison of Higher Order Aberrations between Wavefront Optimized Photorefractive Keratectomy and Laser in situ Keratomileusis in Myopic Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the higher order aberrations (HOA) between wavefront optimized (WFO) laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in myopic patients. STUDY DESIGN: Quasi-experimental study. Place and Duration of the Study: Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from December 2021 to December 2022. METHODOLOGY: Forty-four patients underwent wavefront optimized PRK and fifty-seven patients underwent wavefront optimized LASIK. All variables were recorded before the procedure and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively and included uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), root mean square (RMS) of HOAs, spherical aberration (SA), and coma aberration (CA). RESULTS: A total of 101 eyes of 51 patients were considered in the final analysis. Patients were divided into two groups. Group A comprised of 44 (43.6%) eyes of 22 patients who underwent PRK while group B comprised of 57 (56.4%) eyes of 29 patients who underwent LASIK. UCVA significantly improved postoperatively at 3 and 6 months in both PRK and LASIK groups (p<0.001 for both groups). In this study, the increase in root mean square (RMS) of higher order aberrations from baseline value was 77% after PRK and 28% after LASIK, similar ratio was observed in spherical aberration (SA). The trend of rise in Coma aberrations was more in LASIK group 66.49% as compared to 46.2% in PRK group. CONCLUSION: Both Wavefront Optimized PRK and LASIK are safe and have elicited comparable results of post-procedure visual recovery. There was a marked increase in RMS of HOAs in PRK group as compared to WFO LASIK group while coma aberration increased more in LASIK as compared to PRK postoperatively. KEY WORDS: LASIK, PRK, RMSh, HOAs, Spherical aberration, Coma, Myopia.