The Patient Experience with Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are a heterogenous group of rare tumors that involve the connective tissue in the body (e.g. muscle, tendons). As with many rare tumors, little is known about the impact of STS on patient well-being. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to better understand current knowledge related to patient experience and quality of life (QOL) following diagnosis of STS. METHODS: A systematic review of English-language articles published from 2005 to 2015 was conducted in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO, and Evidence-Based Medicine databases. The review included recent conference proceedings and advocacy websites. Articles were eligible if they included adult STS patient-reported outcomes (PROs) or details on patient experience. RESULTS: Overall, 3430 articles were identified and 20 were eligible for inclusion. Of these, 14 were clinical studies that included PRO measures, 1 summarized PRO measures used in STS studies, and 5 described the STS patient experience. Patients with STS report a range of impacts on QOL, including emotional well-being, body image, functional deficit following surgery, and practical considerations such as child care and work. CONCLUSIONS: Few studies have published either qualitative or quantitative data on the patient experience with STS. While STS has a measurable impact on QOL, there is a lack of detailed information in the published literature. Although PROs are used in clinical studies of STS, they are not STS-specific and may not capture the unique needs of this population. There is a need for qualitative research to better understand both patient and caregiver experiences in STS.

Phase 2 randomized study of enzastaurin (LY317615) for lung cancer prevention in former smokers.

BACKGROUND: Chemoprevention for lung cancer with nutraceutical or anti-inflammatory agents has had mixed clinical benefit. Novel targeted agents hold the promise of greater efficacy and selectivity. The authors of this report evaluated enzastaurin, a selective protein kinase C-ß (PKC-ß) inhibitor with antiproliferative and proapoptotic properties, in former smokers. METHODS: The primary objective of this study was to compare the average fraction of Ki-67-stained cells (the Ki-67 labeling index [LI]) in bronchial biopsy specimens that were collected before and after treatment. Participants were randomized (2:1) to receive either 6 months of daily oral enzastaurin (500 mg) or placebo. Stratification was based on morphology, history of lung cancer, and airway obstruction. RESULTS: In pretrial investigations, the rationale for PKC-ß inhibition and pathway interrogation was established in premalignant lesions and early stage lung cancer. In an intent-to-treat analysis, of 40 randomized participants, there was no significant difference in the pretreatment/post-treatment change in the Ki-67 LI between the enzastaurin group and the placebo group (P = .53). Six participants discontinued enzastaurin, including 4 participants who had adverse events, including abdominal distension, deep vein thrombosis, hyponatremia, and rash, and 2 participants who decided to discontinue. One participant in the placebo group was discontinued on the study because of noncompliance. Two participants had ≥1 serious adverse event (bradycardia, deep vein thrombosis, and hypotension). CONCLUSIONS: To the authors' knowledge, this represents the first chemoprevention trial with a non-US Food and Drug Administration-approved, oral, small-molecule-targeted agent. Although the primary endpoint was not met, enzastaurin was tolerable for 6 months by 75% of participants, and there was a suggestion of response in a subset analysis that was restricted to those who had metaplastic or dysplastic lesions.

Phase II study of gemcitabine and bevacizumab as first-line treatment in taxane-pretreated, HER2-negative, locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: In first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer, the best use of the available therapeutic agents is unclear. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of combined therapy with bevacizumab and gemcitabine. PATIENTS: Women who were to undergo first-line treatment for locoregionally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer were eligible. Patients must have received a taxane-containing regimen in the neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant setting with a ≥ 12-month disease-free interval. METHODS: This was a single-arm, phase II trial. On day 1 of each 14-day cycle, patients received gemcitabine (2500 mg/m(2)) followed by bevacizumab (10 mg/kg). Patients were treated until complete response, progressive disease (PD), or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Fifty-two women were enrolled and treated. The median PFS was 4.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.4-7.6), the 1-year overall survival rate was 68.7% (95% CI, 54.1%-79.5%), and the response rate was 21.4% (95% CI, 10.3%-36.8%). The clinical benefit rate was 35.7%. The median PFS in the triple-negative (n = 19) and non-triple-negative (n = 33) subsets was 3.9 months (95% CI, 2.7-11.7) and 4.9 months (95% CI, 3.4-8.1), respectively. The most common (all grades) drug-related adverse events (AEs) were nausea (51.9%), fatigue (46.2%), decreased appetite (25.0%), and anemia (25.0%). The most common grade 3 or grade 4 drug-related AEs were neutropenia (13.5%), leukopenia (11.5%), and hypertension (7.7%). CONCLUSION: Although the gemcitabine-bevacizumab doublet appears active, the median PFS was lower than expected. There were no unexpected safety signals at this dose and schedule of this combination.