Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 15 de 15
Filter
1.
Respir Care ; 59(5): 637-43, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24106325

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: During invasive mechanical ventilation, inspired gases must be humidified. We previously showed that high ambient temperature greatly impaired the hygrometric performance of heated wire-heated humidifiers. The aim of this bench and clinical study was to assess the humidification performance of passive and active heat and moisture exchangers (HMEs) and the impact of ambient temperature and ventilator settings. METHODS: We first tested on the bench a device with passive and active humidification properties (Humid-Heat, Teleflex), and 2 passive hydrophobic/hygroscopic HMEs (Hygrobac and Hygrobac S, Tyco Healthcare). The devices were tested at 3 different ambient temperatures (from 22 to 30 °C), and at 2 minute ventilation settings (10 and 20 L/min). Inspired gas hygrometry was measured at the Y-piece with the psychrometric method. In addition to the bench study, we measured the hygrometry of inspired gases in 2 different clinical studies. In 15 mechanically ventilated patients, we evaluated Humid-Heat at different settings. Additionally, we evaluated Humid-Heat and compared it with Hygrobac in a crossover study in 10 patients. RESULTS: On the bench, with the Hygrobac and Hygrobac S the inspired absolute humidity was ∼ 30 mg H2O/L, and with the Humid-Heat, slightly < 35 mg H2O/L. Ambient temperature and minute ventilation did not have a clinically important difference on the performance of the tested devices. During the clinical evaluation, Humid-Heat provided inspired humidity in a range from 28.5 to 42.0 mg H2O/L, depending on settings, and was only weakly influenced by the patient's body temperature. CONCLUSIONS: In this study both passive and active HMEs had stable humidification performance with negligible influence of ambient temperature and minute ventilation. This contrasts with previous findings with heated wire-heated humidifiers. Although there are no clear data demonstrating that higher humidification impacts outcomes, it is worth noting that humidity was significantly higher with the active HME.


Subject(s)
Humidity , Pulmonary Ventilation , Respiration, Artificial/instrumentation , Temperature , Cross-Over Studies , Humans , Inhalation , Ventilators, Mechanical
2.
Respir Care ; 57(11): 1879-86, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22417382

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The impact of humidification devices on ventilatory and arterial blood gases parameters during noninvasive ventilation (NIV) remains controversial. The aim of the study was to compare the short-term impact of heat and moisture exchangers (HMEs) and heated humidifiers (HHs) during NIV for either hypercapnic or hypoxemic acute respiratory failure. METHODS: Consecutive subjects receiving NIV were successively treated with HME and HH in randomized order for 30 min each. At the end of each period, arterial blood gases were measured and ventilatory parameters were recorded. RESULTS: Eighty-one subjects were enrolled, of whom 52 were hypercapnic (with or without acidosis) and 29 hypoxemic. Minute ventilation was greater with the HME, in comparison with the HH (15 [12-18] vs 12 [10-16] median [interquartile range], P < .001), while P(aCO(2)) was increased when using HME, indicating a dead space effect. This effect was observed in all subjects, but was more pronounced in hypercapnic subjects (P(aCO(2)) 62 ± 17 mm Hg with HME vs 57 ± 14 with HH, P < .001). In a subgroup of 19 subjects with respiratory acidosis, alveolar hypoventilation improved only with the HH. The amplitude of the dead space impact was a function of the degree of hypercapnia. CONCLUSIONS: Use of an HME decreased CO(2) elimination during NIV, despite increased minute ventilation, especially in hypercapnic subjects.


Subject(s)
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/therapy , Respiration, Artificial/instrumentation , Blood Gas Analysis , Carbon Dioxide/metabolism , Female , Hot Temperature , Humans , Humidity , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Linear Models , Male , Middle Aged , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/physiopathology , Respiratory Dead Space , Respiratory Function Tests , Statistics, Nonparametric , Treatment Outcome
3.
Intensive Care Med ; 35(6): 987-95, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19294366

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: No clear recommendation exists concerning humidification during non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and high flow CPAP, and few hygrometric data are available. METHODS: We measured hygrometry during NIV delivered to healthy subjects with different humidification strategies: heated humidifier (HH), heat and moisture exchanger, (HME) or no humidification (NoH). For each strategy, a turbine and an ICU ventilator were used with different FiO(2) settings, with and without leaks. During CPAP, two different HH and NoH were tested. Inspired gases hygrometry was measured, and comfort was assessed. On a bench, we also assessed the impact of ambient air temperature, ventilator temperature and minute ventilation on HH performances (with NIV settings). RESULTS: During NIV, with NoH, gas humidity was very low when an ICU ventilator was used (5 mgH(2)O/l), but equivalent to ambient air hygrometry with a turbine ventilator at minimal FiO(2) (13 mgH(2)O/l). HME and HH had comparable performances (25-30 mgH(2)O/l), but HME's effectiveness was reduced with leaks (15 mgH(2)O/l). HH performances were reduced by elevated ambient air and ventilator output temperatures. During CPAP, dry gases (5 mgH(2)O/l) were less tolerated than humidified gases. Gases humidified at 15 or 30 mgH(2)O/l were equally tolerated. CONCLUSION: This study provides data on the level of humidity delivered with different humidification strategies during NIV and CPAP. HH and HME provide gas with the highest water content. Comfort data suggest that levels above 15 mgH(2)O/l are well tolerated. In favorable conditions, HH and HMEs are capable of providing such values, even in the presence of leaks.


Subject(s)
Gases , Humidity , Positive-Pressure Respiration/methods , Humans , Intensive Care Units
4.
Chest ; 135(2): 276-286, 2009 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19201708

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Heat and moisture exchangers (HMEs) are increasingly used in the ICU for gas conditioning during mechanical ventilation. Independent assessments of the humidification performance of HMEs are scarce. The aim of the present study was thus to assess the humidification performance of a large number of adult HMEs. METHOD: We assessed 48 devices using a bench test apparatus that simulated real-life physiologic ventilation conditions. Thirty-two devices were described by the manufacturers as HMEs, and 16 were described as antibacterial filters. The test apparatus provided expiratory gases with an absolute humidity (AH) of 35 mg H(2)O/L. The AH of inspired gases was measured after steady state using the psychrometric method. We performed three hygrometric measurements for each device, measured their resistance, and compared our results with the manufacturer data. RESULTS: Of the 32 HMEs tested, only 37.5% performed well (>or= 30 mg H(2)O/L), while 25% performed poorly (< 25 mg H(2)O/L). The mean difference (+/- SD) between our measurements and the manufacturer data was 3.0 +/- 2.7 mg H(2)O/L for devices described as HMEs (maximum, 8.9 mg H(2)O/L) [p = 0.0001], while the mean difference for 36% of the HMEs was > 4 mg H(2)O/L. The mean difference for the antibacterial filters was 0.2 +/- 1.4 mg H(2)O/L. The mean resistance of all the tested devices was 2.17 +/- 0.70 cm H(2)O/L/s. CONCLUSIONS: Several HMEs performed poorly and should not be used as HMEs. The values determined by independent assessments may be lower than the manufacturer data. Describing a device as an HME does not guarantee that it provides adequate humidification. The performance of HMEs must be verified by independent assessment.


Subject(s)
Humidity , Manufactured Materials/standards , Respiration, Artificial/instrumentation , Technology Assessment, Biomedical , Adult , Consumer Product Safety , Equipment Safety , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Sensitivity and Specificity , Ventilators, Mechanical
5.
Crit Care Med ; 37(3): 939-45, 2009 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19237900

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To test the short-term physiologic effects (indexes of respiratory effort, ventilation, and gas exchange), leaks, patient-ventilator asynchrony, and comfort of four noninvasive ventilation (NIV) facial, oronasal, or oral interfaces with major differences in internal volume. DESIGN: Prospective, short-term, crossover randomized physiologic study. SETTING: Medical intensive care unit in a university hospital. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: Fourteen consecutive patients receiving NIV for either hypoxemic (n = 7) or hypercapnic (n = 7) acute respiratory failure. INTERVENTIONS: Four interfaces, tested randomly over consecutive sequences, had very high (977 mL), high (163 mL), moderate (84 mL), or virtually no internal volume (mouthpiece). The pressure level was increased in two patients with the larger mask, and was decreased in all patients when using the mouthpiece. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Despite differences in internal volume, no apparent dead space effect was observed on minute ventilation, work of breathing, or arterial CO2 levels. Compared with baseline, NIV was uniformly successful in reducing indexes of respiratory effort: the pressure-time product of the respiratory muscles decreased from a median (25th-75th interquartile range) of 179 (158-285) cm H2O.sec.min to values between 91 and 111 during NIV, with no differences between masks (p = 0.84). Few differences were observed in terms of arterial blood gases and breathing pattern. Leaks and patient-ventilator asynchronies were greater with the mouthpiece, and comfort with this interface was deemed poor for most patients. CONCLUSION: The internal volume of the masks had no apparent short-term dead space effect on gas exchange, minute ventilation, or patient's effort, suggesting that, with the exception of mouthpiece, interfaces may be interchangeable in clinical practice provided adjustment of the ventilatory device parameters are performed.


Subject(s)
Respiration, Artificial/instrumentation , Respiration, Artificial/methods , Respiratory Insufficiency/physiopathology , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy , Acute Disease , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Over Studies , Equipment Design , Female , Humans , Male , Masks , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies
6.
Intensive Care Med ; 32(12): 1979-86, 2006 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17019545

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: High fractions of inspired oxygen (FIO(2)) used in acute lung injury (ALI) may promote resorption atelectasis. The impact of derecruitment related to high FIO(2) in ALI is debated. We evaluated derecruitment with 100% vs. 60% FIO(2) at two levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). PATIENTS: Fourteen consecutive patients with ALI were studied. INTERVENTIONS: Recruited volume at two PEEP levels was computed from two pressure-volume curves, recorded from PEEP and from zero end-expiratory pressure, using the sinusoidal flow modulation method. PEEP-induced recruitment was measured during prolonged expiration as the difference between the two curves at a given pressure. PaO(2)/FIO(2) was also measured. PEEP was 5 +/- 1 or 14 +/- 3 cmH(2)O and FIO(2) was 60% or 100%, yielding four combinations. We looked for differences between the beginning and end of a 30-min period with each combination. MEASUREMENT AND RESULTS: With low PEEP and 100% FIO(2), recruited volume decreased significantly from 68 +/- 53 to 39 +/- 43 ml and PaO(2)/FIO(2) from 196 +/- 104 to 153 +/- 83 mmHg. With the three other combinations (low PEEP and 60% FIO(2) or high PEEP and 60% or 100% FIO(2)) none of the parameters decreased significantly. CONCLUSION: In mechanically ventilated patients with ALI the breathing of pure oxygen leads to derecruitment, which is prevented by high PEEP.


Subject(s)
Oxygen/adverse effects , Positive-Pressure Respiration/adverse effects , Pulmonary Atelectasis/chemically induced , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy , Adult , Aged , Humans , Middle Aged , Oxygen/administration & dosage , Positive-Pressure Respiration/methods , Pulmonary Gas Exchange , Tidal Volume
7.
Intensive Care Med ; 32(11): 1756-65, 2006 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17019559

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) fails more frequently for de novo acute respiratory failure (de novo) than for cardiogenic pulmonary edema (CPE) or acute-on-chronic respiratory failure (AOC). The impact of NIV failure and success was compared between de novo and CPE or AOC after adjustment for disease severity. SETTINGS: Patients requiring ventilatory support were enrolled in a prospective survey in 70 French ICUs. Of 1076 patients requiring ventilatory support, 524 were eligible, including 299 de novo (NIV use, 30%) and 225 CPE-AOC (NIV use, 55%). DESIGN AND ANALYSIS: Independent risk factors associated with mortality and length of stay were identified by logistic regression analysis. The adjusted outcome of NIV success or failure was compared to that with endotracheal intubation without NIV. RESULTS: NIV success was independently associated with survival in both de novo, adjusted OR 0.05 (95% CI 0.01-0.42), and CPE-AOC OR 0.03 (CI 0.01-0.24). NIV failure was associated with ICU mortality in the de novo group (OR 3.24, CI 1.61-6.53) but not in the CPE-AOC group. Nosocomial pneumonia was less common in patients successful with NIV. NIV failure was associated with a longer ICU stay in CPE-AOC only. The overall use of NIV was independently associated with a better outcome only in CPE-AOC patients (OR 0.33, CI 0.15-0.73). CONCLUSION: The effect of NIV differs between de novo and CPE-AOC patients because NIV failure is associated with increased mortality for de novo patients. This finding should raise a note of caution when applying NIV in this indication.


Subject(s)
Pulmonary Edema/therapy , Respiration, Artificial/methods , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy , Aged , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/etiology , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Intubation, Intratracheal/adverse effects , Length of Stay , Logistic Models , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Pneumonia/epidemiology , Pneumonia/etiology , Prospective Studies , Pulmonary Edema/mortality , Respiration, Artificial/adverse effects , Respiratory Insufficiency/mortality , Risk , Treatment Outcome
8.
Intensive Care Med ; 32(11): 1747-55, 2006 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16799775

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: A prospective survey of French intensive care units (ICUs) in 1997 showed moderate and variable use of noninvasive ventilation (NIV). This study examined changes in NIV use in French ICUs after the intervening 5years. SETTINGS: Patients were enrolled in a prospective survey in 70 French ICUs. METHODS: Three-week survey, with prospective inclusion of all patients requiring ventilatory support. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Overall 1,076 patients received ventilatory support (55% of admissions). First-line NIV was significantly more common than 5years earlier, overall (23% vs. 16%) and especially in patients not intubated before ICU admission (52% vs. 35%). Reasons for respiratory failure were coma (33%), cardiogenic pulmonary edema (8%), acute-on-chronic respiratory failure (17%), and de novo respiratory failure (41%). Significant increases in NIV use were noted for acute-on-chronic respiratory failure (64% vs. 50%) and de novo respiratory failure (22% vs. 14%). Among patients given NIV, 38% subsequently required endotracheal intubation (not significantly different). Independent risk factors for NIV failure were high SAPS II and de novo respiratory failure, whereas factors associated with success were good NIV tolerance and high body mass index. CONCLUSIONS: NIV use has significantly increased in French ICUs during the past 5years, and the success rate has remained unchanged. In patients not previously intubated, NIV is the leading first-line ventilation modality. The proportion of patients successfully treated with NIV increased significantly over the 5-year period (13% vs. 9% of all patients receiving ventilatory support).


Subject(s)
Intubation, Intratracheal/statistics & numerical data , Respiration, Artificial/methods , Respiration, Artificial/trends , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy , Acute Disease , Coma/therapy , France , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Logistic Models , Multivariate Analysis , Pneumonia/therapy , Prospective Studies , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/therapy , Pulmonary Edema/therapy , Treatment Outcome
9.
Intensive Care Med ; 32(7): 1014-21, 2006 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16791663

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: In mechanically ventilated patients with induced hypothermia, the efficacy of heat and moisture exchangers and heated humidifiers to adequately humidify the airway is poorly known. The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of different humidification devices during moderate hypothermia. DESIGN: Prospective, cross-over randomized study. SETTINGS: Medical Intensive Care Unit in a University Hospital. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: Nine adult patients hospitalized after cardiac arrest in whom moderate hypothermia was induced (33 degrees C for 24[Symbol: see text]h). INTERVENTIONS: Patients were ventilated at admission (period designated "normothermia") with a heat and moisture exchanger, and were randomly ventilated during hypothermia with a heat and moisture exchanger, a heated humidifier, and an active heat and moisture exchanger. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Core temperature, inspired and expired gas absolute and relative humidity were measured. Each system demonstrated limitations in its ability to humidify gases in the specific situation of hypothermia. Performances of heat and moisture exchangers were closely correlated to core temperature (r (2)[Symbol: see text]=[Symbol: see text]0.84). During hypothermia, heat and moisture exchangers led to major under-humidification, with absolute humidity below 25[Symbol: see text]mgH(2)O/l. The active heat and moisture exchanger slightly improved humidification. Heated humidifiers were mostly adequate but led to over-humidification in some patients, with inspiratory absolute humidity higher than maximal water content at 33 degrees C with a positive balance between inspiratory and expiratory water content. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that in the case of moderate hypothermia, heat and moisture exchangers should be used cautiously and that heated humidifiers may lead to over-humidification with the currently recommended settings.


Subject(s)
Heart Arrest/therapy , Humidity , Hypothermia, Induced/instrumentation , Adult , Aged , Cross-Over Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies
10.
Intensive Care Med ; 31(10): 1446-50, 2005 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16132889

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of a computer-driven system (CDS) to manage pressure-support ventilation over prolonged periods and to predict weaning readiness compared to intensivists. The system continuously adapts pressure support, gradually decreases ventilatory assistance when possible, and indicates weaning readiness. DESIGN AND SETTING: A two-center, prospective, open, clinical, pilot study in medical ICUs of two university hospitals. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: 42 consecutive mechanically ventilated patients (60+/-14 years, SAPS II 39+/-15), 9 of whom were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: As soon as patients could tolerate pressure support, they were ventilated with the CDS. The times of weaning readiness determined by the intensivists and CDS were compared. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Weaning was successful in 25 patients and failed in 7; unplanned extubation occurred in 1 patient. Time on CDS ventilation was 3+/-3 days (maximum, 12 days). The CDS detected weaning readiness earlier than the intensivists in 17 patients, and intensivists earlier than the CDS in 4; in 11 patients detection times coincided. CONCLUSIONS: A CDS was successful in fully managing pressure-support ventilation over prolonged periods and often proposed weaning readiness earlier than the intensivists did. Use of this CDS may reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation.


Subject(s)
Computers , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/therapy , Respiration, Artificial , Ventilator Weaning/methods , Adult , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/classification , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/mortality , Severity of Illness Index
11.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 172(9): 1112-8, 2005 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16081548

ABSTRACT

A prospective, crossover, physiologic study was performed in 10 patients with acute lung injury to assess the respective short-term effects of noninvasive pressure-support ventilation and continuous positive airway pressure. We measured breathing pattern, neuromuscular drive, inspiratory muscle effort, arterial blood gases, and dyspnea while breathing with minimal support and the equipment for measurements, with two combinations of pressure-support ventilation above positive end-expiratory pressure (10-10 and 15-5 cm H2O), and with continuous positive airway pressure (10 cm H2O). Tidal volume was increased with pressure support, and not with continuous positive airway pressure. Neuromuscular drive and inspiratory muscle effort were lower with the two pressure-support ventilation levels than with other situations (p < 0.05). Dyspnea relief was significantly better with high-level pressure-support ventilation (15-5 cm H2O; p < 0.001). Oxygenation improved when 10 cm H2O positive end-expiratory pressure was applied, alone or in combination. We conclude that, in patients with acute lung injury (1) noninvasive pressure-support ventilation combined with positive end-expiratory pressure is needed to reduce inspiratory muscle effort; (2) continuous positive airway pressure, in this setting, improves oxygenation but fails to unload the respiratory muscles; and (3) pressure-support levels of 10 and 15 cm H2O provide similar unloading but differ in their effects on dyspnea.


Subject(s)
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure , Positive-Pressure Respiration , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/physiopathology , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy , Adult , Aged , Cross-Over Studies , Dyspnea/etiology , Dyspnea/physiopathology , Dyspnea/therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Pulmonary Gas Exchange/physiology , Respiratory Mechanics/physiology , Treatment Outcome , Work of Breathing/physiology
12.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 170(10): 1073-9, 2004 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15271695

ABSTRACT

Although heated humidifiers are considered the most efficient humidification devices for mechanical ventilation, endotracheal tube occlusion caused by dry secretions has been reported with heated-wire humidifiers. We tested the hypothesis that inlet chamber temperature, influenced by ambient air and ventilator output temperatures, may affect humidifier performance, as assessed by hygrometry. Hygrometry was measured with three different humidifiers under several conditions, varying ambient air temperatures (high, 28-30 degrees C; and normal, 22-24 degrees C), ventilators with different gas temperatures, and two VE levels. Clinical measurements were performed to confirm bench measurements. Humidifier performance was strongly correlated with inlet chamber temperature in both the bench (p < 0.0001, r2 = 0.93) and the clinical study. With unfavorable conditions, absolute humidity of inspired gas was much lower than recommended (approximately 20 mg H2O/L). Performance was improved by specific settings or new compensatory algorithms. Hygrometry could be evaluated from condensation on the wall chamber only when ambient air temperature was normal but not with high air temperature. An increase in inlet chamber temperature induced by high ambient temperature markedly reduces the performance of heated-wire humidifiers, leading to a risk of endotracheal tube occlusion. Such systems should be avoided in these conditions unless automatic compensation algorithms are used.


Subject(s)
Humidity , Respiration, Artificial/methods , Temperature , Ventilators, Mechanical , Benchmarking , Equipment Safety , Hot Temperature , Humans , Intubation, Intratracheal , Linear Models , Monitoring, Physiologic , Positive-Pressure Respiration/adverse effects , Positive-Pressure Respiration/methods , Probability , Respiration, Artificial/adverse effects , Risk Assessment , Sensitivity and Specificity , Statistics, Nonparametric
13.
JAMA ; 290(22): 2985-91, 2003 Dec 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14665660

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Randomized controlled trials have shown that the use of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) reduces the need for endotracheal intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation and reduces complication rates and mortality in selected groups of patients. But whether these benefits translate to a clinical setting is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate longitudinally the routine implementation of NIV and its effect on patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or severe cardiogenic pulmonary edema (CPE). DESIGN: Retrospective, observational cohort study using prospectively collected data from January 1, 1994, through December 31, 2001. SETTING: A 26-bed medical intensive care unit (ICU) of a French university referral hospital. PARTICIPANTS: A cohort of 479 consecutive patients ventilated for acute exacerbation of COPD or CPE. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The ICU mortality and incidence rates of ICU-acquired infections. RESULTS: A significant increase in NIV use and a concomitant decrease in mortality and ICU-acquired infection rates were observed over the study years. With adjustment for relevant covariates and propensity scores, NIV was identified as an independent factor linked with a reduced risk of death in the cohort (odds ratio [OR], 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-0.78), whereas a high severity score on admission (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.10) and the occurrence of a nosocomial infection (OR, 3.08; 95% CI, 1.62-5.84) were independently associated with death. Rates of ICU-acquired pneumonia decreased from 20% in 1994 to 8% in 2001 (P =.04). CONCLUSION: Implementing routine use of NIV in critically ill patients with acute exacerbation of COPD or severe CPE was associated with improved survival and reduction of nosocomial infections.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/epidemiology , Hospital Mortality , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/therapy , Pulmonary Edema/therapy , Respiration, Artificial , Acute Disease , Aged , Critical Illness , Cross Infection/etiology , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Middle Aged , Pneumonia/epidemiology , Pneumonia/etiology , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/mortality , Pulmonary Edema/mortality , Respiration, Artificial/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis
14.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 167(9): 1215-24, 2003 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12615633

ABSTRACT

We studied endotracheal suctioning-induced alveolar derecruitment and its prevention in nine patients with acute lung injury. Changes in end-expiratory lung volume measured by inductive plethysmography, positive end-expiratory pressure-induced alveolar recruitment assessed by pressure-volume curves, oxygen saturation, and respiratory mechanics were recorded. Suctioning was performed after disconnection from the ventilator, through the swivel adapter of the catheter mount, with a closed system, and with the two latter techniques while performing recruitment maneuvers during suctioning (40 cm H2O pressure-supported breaths). End-expiratory lung volume after disconnection fell more than with all other techniques (-1,466 +/- 586, -733 +/- 406, -531 +/- 228, -168 +/- 176, and -284 +/- 317 ml after disconnection, through the swivel adapter, with the closed system, and with the two latter techniques with pressure-supported breaths, respectively, p < 0.001), and was not fully recovered 1 minute after suctioning. Recruitment decreased after disconnection and using the swivel adapter (-104 +/- 31 and -63 +/- 25 ml, respectively), was unchanged with the closed system (-1 +/- 10 ml), and increased when performing recruitment maneuvers during suctioning (71 +/- 37 and 60 +/- 30 ml) (p < 0.001). Changes in alveolar recruitment correlated with changes in lung volume (rho = 0.88, p < 0.001) and compliance (rho = 0.9, p < 0.001). Oxygenation paralleled lung volume changes. Suctioning-induced lung derecruitment in acute lung injury can be prevented by performing recruitment maneuvers during suctioning and minimized by avoiding disconnection.


Subject(s)
Intubation, Intratracheal , Pulmonary Alveoli/injuries , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy , Suction/adverse effects , Suction/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Airway Resistance , Blood Gas Analysis , Humans , Lung Compliance , Lung Volume Measurements , Middle Aged , Monitoring, Physiologic , Plethysmography , Positive-Pressure Respiration/adverse effects , Positive-Pressure Respiration/methods , Regression Analysis , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/etiology , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/mortality , Respiratory Mechanics , Suction/instrumentation , Survival Analysis , Tidal Volume
15.
Intensive Care Med ; 28(11): 1582-9, 2002 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12415444

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Heat and moisture exchangers (HME) increase circuitry deadspace compared to heated humidifiers (HH). This study compared the effect of HH and HME during noninvasive ventilation (NIV) on arterial blood gases and patient's effort assessed by respiratory muscles pressure-time product and by work of breathing (WOB). DESIGN AND SETTING: Randomized cross-over study in a medical intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Nine patients receiving NIV for moderate to severe acute hypercapnic respiratory failure. MEASUREMENTS: HME was randomly compared to HH during periods of 20 min. Each device was studied without (ZEEP) and with a PEEP of 5 cmH(2)O. At the end of each period arterial blood gases, ventilatory parameters, oesophageal and gastric pressures were recorded and indexes of patient's effort calculated. RESULTS: Minute ventilation was significantly higher with HME than with HH (ZEEP: 15.8+/-3.7 vs. 12.8+/-3.6 l/min) despite a similar PaCO(2) (60+/-16 vs. 57+/-16 mmHg). HME was associated with a greater increase in WOB (ZEEP: 15.5+/-7.7 vs. 8.4+/-4.5 J/min and PEEP: 11.3+/-5.7 vs. 7.3+/-3.8 J/min) and indexes of patient effort. NIV with HME failed to decrease WOB compared to baseline. Addition of PEEP reduced the level of effort, but similar differences between HME and HH were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In patients receiving NIV for moderate to severe acute hypercapnic respiratory failure, the use of HME lessens the efficacy of NIV in reducing effort compared to HH.


Subject(s)
Humidity , Respiration, Artificial/methods , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy , Work of Breathing , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Blood Gas Analysis , Cross-Over Studies , Female , Hot Temperature , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , Monitoring, Physiologic , Positive-Pressure Respiration , Respiratory Insufficiency/physiopathology , Statistics, Nonparametric , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...