Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Inj Prev ; 28(6): 553-559, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35922137

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We evaluated the impact of Senate Bill 489 passed in May 2017, allowing the sale and use of fireworks in Iowa 1 June to 8 July and 10 December to 3 January, on hospital presentations for firework injuries in the state. To identify the public health implications of this law, we conducted a detailed subanalysis of hospital presentations to the two level I trauma centres. METHODS: Hospital presentations for firework injuries from 1 June 2014 to 31 July 2019 were identified using the Iowa Hospital Admission database and registries and medical records of Iowa's two level 1 trauma centres. Trauma centres' data were reviewed to obtain demographics, injury information and hospital course. Prefirework and postfirework legalisation state data were compared using negative binomial regression analysis. Trauma centre data detailing injuries were compared using χ2 and Mann-Whitney U tests as appropriate. RESULTS: Emergency department (ED) visits and hospital admissions for firework injuries increased in Iowa post-legalisation (B-estimate=0.598±0.073, p<0.001 and B-estimate=0.612±0.322, p=0.058, respectively). ED visits increased postlegalisation in July (73.6% vs 64.5%; p=0.008), reflecting an increase in paediatric admissions (81.8% vs 62.5%; p=0.006). Trauma centres' data showed similar trends. The most common injury site across both study periods was the hands (48.5%), followed by the eyes (34.3%) and face (28.3%). Amputations increased from 0 prelegalisation to 16.2% postlegalisation. CONCLUSION: Firework legalisation led to an increase in the number of admissions and more severe injuries.


Subject(s)
Blast Injuries , Eye Injuries , Hand Injuries , Child , Humans , Blast Injuries/epidemiology , Blast Injuries/etiology , Blast Injuries/prevention & control , Emergency Service, Hospital , Trauma Centers , Retrospective Studies
3.
J Emerg Med ; 55(1): 121-124, 2018 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29739630

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Massive pulmonary embolus (PE) with prolonged cardiac arrest in the setting of pregnancy has few treatment options. Selections are further restricted if there are contraindications to the standard therapies of embolectomy and thrombolysis. We report a case of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) used as salvage therapy for a critically ill pregnant patient. CASE REPORT: A 21-year-old woman presented to a small rural hospital with chest pain, dyspnea, hypoxia, and syncope. In their emergency department, she suffered 2 episodes of cardiac arrest requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and fetal demise followed. A computed tomography scan revealed a saddle PE. She was transferred to our tertiary care hospital and arrived critically ill, on multiple vasopressors, and in cardiogenic shock. Because standard treatments, namely thrombolysis and embolectomy, were contraindicated in this case, ECLS was employed for 7 days. She was discharged home after 23 days, and at follow-up 5 months after her admission, she was found to have made a near-complete recovery. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: ECLS is a viable option as salvage therapy for pregnant patients with massive PE who have contraindications to thrombolysis and embolectomy.


Subject(s)
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/methods , Heart Arrest/therapy , Pulmonary Embolism/complications , Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Female , Heart Arrest/etiology , Humans , Pregnancy , Pulmonary Embolism/therapy , Salvage Therapy/methods , Syncope/etiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...