Parallel-Group Controlled Trial of Surgery Versus Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Stage I Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Surgery is the standard of care for T1bN0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), whereas chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is a treatment option. This trial aimed to investigate the noninferiority of CRT relative to surgery for T1bN0M0 ESCC. METHODS: Clinical T1bN0M0 ESCC patients were eligible for enrollment in this prospective nonrandomized controlled study of surgery versus CRT. The primary endpoint was overall survival, which was determined using inverse probability weighting with propensity scoring. Surgery consisted of an esophagectomy with 2- or 3-field lymph node dissection. CRT consisted of 2 courses of 5-fluorouracil (700 mg/m2) on days 1-4 and cisplatin (70 mg/m2) on day 1 every 4 weeks with concurrent radiation (60 Gy). RESULTS: From December 20, 2006 to February 5, 2013, a total of 368 patients were enrolled in the nonrandomized portion of the study. The patient characteristics in surgery arm and CRT arm, respectively, were as follows: median age, 62 and 65 years; proportion of males, 82.8% and 88.1%; and proportion of performance status 0, 99.5% and 98.1%. Comparisons were made using the nonrandomized groups. The 5-year overall survival rate was 86.5% in the surgery arm and 85.5% in the CRT arm (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-1.64 [<1.78]). The complete response rate in the CRT arm was 87.3% (95% confidence interval, 81.1-92.1). The 5-year progression-free survival rate was 81.7% in the surgery arm and 71.6% in the CRT arm. Treatment-related deaths occurred in 2 patients in the surgery arm and none in the CRT arm. CONCLUSIONS: CRT is noninferior to surgery and should be considered for the treatment of T1bN0M0 ESCC.

Cumulative incidence of venous thromboembolism in patients with advanced cancer in prospective observational study.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is frequently observed in patients with advanced cancer. The objective of this prospective observational study was to estimate, based on intensive screening, using computed tomography, lower-extremity ultrasonography, and D-dimer testing, the prevalence of VTE in patients with advanced cancer. Patients with metastatic or locally advanced cancer without anticoagulant therapy, who were planning to receive chemotherapy during 4 weeks, were eligible. Evaluations of VTE were performed at pretreatment, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after the start of chemotherapy. Primary endpoint was cumulative incidence of VTE for 24 weeks. Secondary endpoints included incidence of VTE (pretreatment, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after the start of chemotherapy), VTE according to primary cancer site, symptomatic VTE, pulmonary thromboembolism (PE), and treatment of VTE. We enrolled 860 patients with a median age of 68 years, including 34% female and 71% lung cancer. Cumulative incidence of VTE for 24 weeks was 22.6% (95% confidence interval: 19.8%-25.5%) (194 of 860 patients). Incidence of VTE was 11.3% pretreatment, 16.8% 12 weeks, and 14.1% 24 weeks. Symptomatic VTE was observed in 4.0% and PE in 1.0% of patients. By multivariate analysis, sex, D-dimer level, and platelet count were independent risk factors of VTE for 24 weeks. This large prospective observational study showed that cumulative incidence of VTE was high in advanced cancer patients, mainly lung cancer. Although most patients showed asymptomatic VTE, intensive screening of VTE may be considered in advanced cancer patients, especially in women with high level of D-dimer and decreased platelet count (UMIN000015243).

Gastrectomy with or without neoadjuvant S-1 plus cisplatin for type 4 or large type 3 gastric cancer (JCOG0501): an open-label, phase 3, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Specific treatment strategies are sorely needed for scirrhous-type gastric cancer still, which has poor prognosis. Based on the promising results of our previous phase II study (JCOG0210), we initiated a phase III study to confirm the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in type 4 or large type 3 gastric cancer. METHODS: Patients aged 20-75 years without a macroscopic unresectable factor as confirmed via staging laparoscopy were randomly assigned to surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 (Arm A) or NAC (S-1plus cisplatin) followed by D2 gastrectomy plus adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 (Arm B). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Between October 2005 and July 2013, 316 patients were enrolled, allocating 158 patients to each arm. In Arm B, in which NAC was completed in 88% of patients. Significant downstaging based on tumor depth, lymph node metastasis, and peritoneal cytology was observed using NAC. Excluding the initial 16 patients randomized before the first revision of the protocol, 149 and 151 patients in arms A and B, respectively, were included in the primary analysis. The 3-year OS rates were 62.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 54.1-69.6] in Arm A and 60.9% (95% CI 52.7-68.2) in Arm B. The hazard ratio of Arm B against Arm A was 0.916 (95% CI 0.679-1.236). CONCLUSIONS: For type 4 or large type 3 gastric cancer, NAC with S-1 plus cisplatin failed to demonstrate a survival benefit. D2 surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy remains the standard treatment.

Differences in disease status between patients with progression after first-line chemotherapy versus early relapse after adjuvant chemotherapy who undergo second-line chemotherapy for gastric cancer: Exploratory analysis of the randomized phase III TRICS trial.

BACKGROUND: Second-line chemotherapy (SLC) improves survival in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Patients receiving SLC are categorized into two disease status groups: tumour progression after first-line chemotherapy and early recurrence after adjuvant chemotherapy. Differences between these groups have not yet been clarified. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 163 eligible patients registered in the randomized phase III TRICS trial evaluating SLC for patients with AGC was classified into the progressive disease (PD) group (n = 55) or the early relapse (ER) group (n = 108). We compared overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and safety. Adjusted OS and adjusted PFS were estimated using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). RESULTS: The ER group had a lower median age than the PD group (66 vs. 72 years; P = 0.016), performance status (PS) 0 was more frequently seen in the ER group (87% vs. 71%; P = 0.012). The adjusted median OS was 13.7 months in the ER group and 13.6 months in the PD group (IPTW hazard ratio [HR]: 1.023; P = 0.854). The adjusted median PFS was 4.9 months in the ER group and 4.4 months in the PD group (IPTW HR: 0.707; P = 0.004). ORR was significantly better in the ER group than the PD group (21.3% vs. 4.9%; P = 0.020). No significant differences were observed in the incidence of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: ER was associated with improved PFS and better ORR than PD, although no difference in survival was demonstrated. From the viewpoint of treatment outcome, it seems appropriate to treat patients with ER in the same way as patients with PD. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN 000002571.

Diagnosis of invasion depth in resectable advanced gastric cancer for neoadjuvant chemotherapy: An exploratory analysis of Japan clinical oncology group study: JCOG1302A.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is increasingly used for resectable locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC). JCOG1302A investigated the diagnostic criteria of LAGC patients with cT3-4/N1-3 to minimize contamination of pathological stage I as a candidate for NAC. In JCOG1302A, 77.2% of cT3-4 tumors diagnosed via a combination of endoscopy and computed tomography (CT) were pT3-4. However, the role of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and additional diagnostic procedures/modalities remains unclear. Here, we investigated whether EUS, thin-slice CT, and foaming agent (FA) in CT contribute to accurate diagnosis of AGC invasion depth. METHODS: Using JCOG1302A study data, we compared positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and kappa index (KI) between conventional and additional diagnostic procedures to identify pT3-4: conventional endoscopy (CE) with versus without EUS, 1-mm versus 5-mm CT slice, and CT with versus without FA. RESULTS: We analyzed 1232 patients' data. PPV, NPV, and KI were 79.2%/73.7%, 59.2%/58.8%, and 0.38/0.39 (CE alone/CE with EUS), 77.8%/75.5%, 62.9%/71.2%, and 0.38/0.39 (5-mm CT/1-mm CT), and 78.6%/75.1%, 60.9%/69.7%, and 0.38/0.40 (CT without FA/CT with FA), respectively. Overall, there were no remarkable differences in any comparison. More specifically, PPV and KI were slightly higher with CE alone rather than CE with EUS. Although NPV was higher for 1-mm CT and CT with FA, PPV was rather higher for 5-mm CT and CT without FA. CONCLUSION: Additional diagnostic procedures/modalities, like EUS, 1-mm slice CT, or FA in CT may not improve the diagnostic accuracy of invasion depth in resectable LAGC.

Usefulness of virtual enteroscopy for the detection of small polypoid lesion in the small bowel, a case report.

INTRODUCTION: Virtual enteroscopy (VE) has been developed to explore the entire small bowel. We have previously reported that VE can reveal elevated lesions measuring >10 mm in diameter. However, data on the existence of smaller polypoid lesions is scarce. This study aimed to report a case of pyogenic granuloma in the ileum detected by VE. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 55-year-old woman presented to our hospital with iron deficiency anemia. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy, colonoscopy, and abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography did not indicate any bleeding sources. Video capsule endoscopy revealed a small polypoid lesion in the small bowel. VE was subsequently performed and a polypoid lesion was detected at 119 cm from the ileocecal valve. Its size was estimated to be 6 mm. Based on VE findings, laparoscopic-assisted surgery for the small bowel tumor was performed. During surgery, the polypoid lesion, at 120 cm from the end of the ileum, was barely palpable. The resected specimen showed a 5.5 × 5.0 mm polypoid lesion. Microscopically, the polypoid lesion was diagnosed as pyogenic granuloma. DISCUSSION: We detected a 5.5 × 5.0 mm polypoid lesion in the small bowel, and this is the minimum size of the lesion visualized on VE. This imaging technique provides surgeons with data on the location, number, and size of polypoid lesions. CONCLUSION: VE is a new useful tool for the preoperative collection of data on small polypoid lesions in the small bowel.

Adherence to the guidelines and the pathological diagnosis of high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the real world.

BACKGROUND: A multidisciplinary approach based on guidelines and pathological diagnosis by specialized pathologists are important for improving the prognosis and QoL of GIST patients. This study examined the adherence to the guidelines and the concordance of the pathological diagnosis of high-risk GISTs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among 541 patients with high-risk GISTs recruited to the prospective registry between Dec. 2012 and Dec. 2015, 534 patients were analyzed after central pathology with KIT and DOG1 IHC and genotyping of KIT and PDGFRA. RESULTS: Of the 534 patients, 432 (81%) received imatinib adjuvant therapy at a starting dose of 400 or 300 mg/day. Multivariate analysis indicated that age (HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.58-0.88), tumor size (HR for > 10 cm vs < 5 cm, 3.87; 95% CI 1.72-8.74), mitosis (HR for > 10 vs < 5, 3.54; 95% CI 1.84-6.79), tumor rupture (HR 3.69; 95% CI 1.43-9.52) and performance status (HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.31-0.99) were independently related to adjuvant therapy. Among the 534 high-risk GISTs diagnosed locally, 19 tumors (3.6%) were diagnosed as non-GISTs, and the other 93 (18.1%) GISTs were reclassified into lower risk categories by central pathology. Among 10 patients with non-GISTs and 8 patients with PDGFRA D842V mutations, 4 (40%) and 3 (38%) patients, respectively, continued the therapy after receiving the central pathology results. CONCLUSIONS: The adherence to guidelines and the concordance of pathological diagnoses were comparatively good for high-risk GISTs. Central pathology may contribute to improved diagnosis, but further refinements may be required.

Video-assisted esophagectomy using a port-free organ retractor for the prevention of laryngeal nerve paralysis.

INTRODUCTION: Recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) paralysis is a major complication of esophageal cancer surgery. The free jaw clip (FJ clip) was developed as an organ-retracting device, and it can also reduce the number of ports required during surgery. Here, we describe a new technique for lymphadenectomy along the left RLN using the FJ clip. MATERIALS AND SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: After the middle and lower mediastinal lymph nodes were dissected, the upper esophagus and other tissues, including the lymph nodes and left RLN, were retracted by cutting the tracheal arteries between the esophagus and trachea and then pulling the upper esophagus to the dorsal side with the FJ clip. The esophagus was transected at the upper mediastinum, and the proximal esophagus was drawn by the FJ clip. This technique helped provide a good field of view during lymphadenectomy along the left RLN. The data of nine consecutive patients who underwent video-assisted esophagectomy in the left lateral decubitus position by the same surgeon were reviewed. Postoperative left RLN paralysis occurred in only one patient in whom the RLN could not be preserved. DISCUSSION: Given the excellent short-term outcomes with respect to left RLN paralysis, lymphadenectomy along the left RLN using the FJ clip was safe and feasible.

Survival outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA or IB gastric cancer (JCOG0912): a multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) is increasingly being used as an alternative to open distal gastrectomy (ODG) for gastric cancer treatment. Retrospective studies have shown equivalent survival with the two procedures, but these studies are limited by selection bias because LADG is more technically difficult than ODG. We aimed to evaluate whether LADG was non-inferior to ODG in terms of long-term survival outcomes. METHODS: We did an open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 randomised controlled trial at 33 institutions in Japan. Patients aged 20-80 years with histologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma (T1N0, T1N1, or T2[MP]N0), clinical stage I, in the middle or lower third of the stomach, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, with a body-mass index of less than 30 kg/m2, were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive ODG or LADG. Randomisation was done by telephone, fax, or with a web-based system in the Japan Clinical Oncology Group Data Center; a minimisation method with a random component was used to adjust for institution and clinical stage (IA or IB). Only study-accredited surgeons performed ODG and LADG. The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival and was analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. The non-inferiority margin (LADG vs ODG) was set at a hazard ratio (HR) of 1·54. The trial was registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000003319. FINDINGS: Between March 15, 2010, and Nov 29, 2013, 921 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive ODG (n=459) or LADG (n=462). 912 (99%) participants had the assigned surgery. 5-year relapse-free survival was 94·0% (95% CI 91·4-95·9) in the ODG group and 95·1% (92·7-96·8) in the LADG group. LADG was non-inferior to ODG for relapse-free survival (HR 0·84 [90% CI 0·56-1·27]), p=0·0075). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse event was bowel obstruction, occurring in 11 (2%) of 455 patients in the ODG group and five (1%) of 457 patients in the LADG group. There were no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION: This trial supports the non-inferiority of LADG compared with ODG for clinical stage I gastric cancer relapse-free survival, suggesting that LADG should be considered a standard treatment option when performed by experienced surgeons. FUNDING: Japan National Cancer Center, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan, Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development.

Randomized phase III trial of gastrectomy with or without neoadjuvant S-1 plus cisplatin for type 4 or large type 3 gastric cancer, the short-term safety and surgical results: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study (JCOG0501).

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with linitis plastica (type 4) and large (≥ 8 cm) ulcero-invasive-type (type 3) gastric cancer is extremely poor, even after extended surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. Given the promising results of our previous phase II study evaluating neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with S-1 plus cisplatin (JCOG0210), we performed a phase III study to confirm the efficacy of NAC in these patients, with the safety and surgical results are presented here. METHODS: Eligible patients were randomized to gastrectomy plus adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 (Arm A) or NAC followed by gastrectomy + adjuvant chemotherapy (Arm B). The primary endpoint was the overall survival (OS). This trial is registered at the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry as C000000279. RESULTS: From February 2007 to July 2013, 300 patients were randomized (Arm A 149, Arm B 151). NAC was completed in 133 patients (88%). Major grade 3/4 adverse events during NAC were neutropenia (29.3%), nausea (5.4%), diarrhea (4.8%), and fatigue (2.7%). Gastrectomy was performed in 147 patients (99%) in Arm A and 139 patients (92%) in Arm B. The operation time was significantly shorter in Arm B than in Arm A (median 255 vs. 240 min, respectively; p = 0.024). There were no significant differences in Grade 2-4 morbidity and mortality (25.2% and 1.3% in Arm A and 15.8% and 0.7% in Arm B, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: NAC for type 4 and large type 3 gastric cancer followed by D2 gastrectomy can be safely performed without increasing the morbidity or mortality.

A study of second-line irinotecan plus cisplatin vs. irinotecan alone in platinum-naïve patients with early relapse of gastric cancer refractory to adjuvant S-1 monotherapy: exploratory subgroup analysis of the randomized phase III TRICS trial.

BACKGROUNDS: Many patients with gastric cancer relapse during or early after adjuvant chemotherapy. The standard treatment for early relapse patients is a second-line chemotherapy (SLC) based on irinotecan, taxanes, or a platinum-based chemotherapy. The platinum-containing biweekly irinotecan plus cisplatin (IRI/CDDP) combination was assumed to be promising in several reports of clinical trials as SLC. TRICS trial, a randomized phase III study of IRI/CDDP vs. IRI in platinum-naïve gastric cancers refractory to S-1 monotherapy, revealed that both irinotecan-based chemotherapies were effective and well tolerated. METHODS: This study analyzed 108 patients in the TRICS trial who experienced early relapse. Patients receiving IRI/CDDP (IRI, 60 mg/m2; CDDP, 30 mg/m2, q2w) versus IRI (150 mg/m2, q2w) were compared regarding overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and safety. RESULTS: The OS was 14.0 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.0-21.2) and 14.0 (95% CI: 10.7-16.5) months for IRI/CDDP and IRI, respectively (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.782; 95% CI: 0.515-1.188, P = 0.249). No significant differences were observed for PFS (5.0 vs. 4.5 months, respectively; HR: 0.802; 95% CI: 0.543-1.185, P = 0.268) or ORR (19.6% [95% CI: 9.4-33.9%] vs. 23.3% [95% CI: 11.8-38.6%], respectively). The incidence of grade 3-4 anemia was higher for IRI/CDDP than for IRI (20% vs. 0%, respectively; P = 0.0006). CONCLUSION: Our study showed no significant survival differences between IRI/CDDP and IRI in platinum-naïve patients who relapsed during or within 6 months after S-1 adjuvant therapy; therefore, IRI may be a good option in this population. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: UMIN 000002571.

A case of acute respiratory distress syndrome due to lymphography with Lipiodol for chylothorax after esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Lymphography with Lipiodol is useful for chylothorax. There were many slight complications, but reports of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) after lymphography were few. CASE PRESENTATION: A 75-year-old man with esophageal cancer developed chylothorax after esophagectomy. Conservative treatment was ineffective, and he underwent lymphography with 8.5 mL of Lipiodol. He developed a high fever soon after lymphography, followed by severe ARDS requiring artificial respiration 5 days later. He recovered from ARDS but subsequently developed pulmonary fibrosis and was discharged with domiciliary oxygen therapy 3 months later. CONCLUSION: Although ARDS is a rare complication of lymphography with Lipiodol, this procedure should be applied carefully in patients with chylothorax.

Small bowel obstruction due to internal hernia caused by the ureter after laparoscopic radical cystectomy and ileal conduit: A case report.

A 74-year-old man presented at our hospital with complaints of abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. He had undergone laparoscopic radical cystectomy and ileal conduit for urinary bladder cancer 1 month earlier. The patient had abdominal distention, resonant sounds on percussion, and diffuse abdominal tenderness without rebound or guarding. Abdominal CT revealed dilated jejunal loops herniated through a cord-like structure. Based on these findings, emergency surgery was performed, and intestinal dilatation into the space between the ureter, the ileal conduit, and the sacral bone was detected. The loops were released manually and were not resected. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report of small bowel obstruction due to internal hernia caused by the ureter after laparoscopic radical cystectomy and ileal conduit. Retroperitonealization and the minimum required mobilization of the ureters may be necessary when urinary diversion is constructed, especially in laparoscopic or robotic surgeries.

Hand grip strength as a predictor of postoperative complications in esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Radical esophagectomy remains the primary treatment option for resectable esophageal cancer. However, it sometimes induces postoperative complications due to its invasive nature. Recently, the impact of loss of muscle mass on postoperative complications and survival among cancer patients has been highlighted. This study aimed to identify the impact of low hand grip strength (HGS) on postoperative complications after esophagectomy. METHODS: A total of 188 patients (male: 166, female: 22) who underwent radical esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction between 2008 and 2014 were included. The correlation between HGS and age was analyzed using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Due to the small patient numbers, only male patients were stratified into two groups according to age (<70 years: non-elderly group, ≥70 years: elderly group). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed for each group using postoperative complication occurrence as the endpoint to determine an optimal HGS cutoff value. RESULTS: Postoperative complications occurred in 60.9% of the elderly group and 47.4% of the non-elderly group. When the cutoff values were set at 30.5 and 37 kg for the elderly and non-elderly group, respectively, low HGS was an independent predictive factor of postoperative complications on multivariate analysis only in the elderly group (p = 0.008). In the elderly group, the incidence of postoperative pneumonia was 39.5% among patients with low HGS vs. 3.8% among patients with high HGS. CONCLUSION: Preoperative HGS is an independent predictive factor of postoperative complications, especially postoperative pneumonia, for elderly male patients with esophageal cancer treated with radical esophagectomy.

Impact of laparoscopy on the prevention of pulmonary complications after thoracoscopic esophagectomy using data from JCOG0502: a prospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are the most common causes of serious morbidity after esophagectomy, which involves both thoracic and abdominal incisions. Although the thoracoscopic approach decreases PPC frequency after esophagectomy, it remains unclear whether the frequency is further decreased by combining it with laparoscopic gastric mobilization. This study aimed to determine the impact of laparoscopy on the prevention of PPCs after thoracoscopic esophagectomy using data from the Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study 0502 (JCOG0502). METHODS: JCOG0502 is a four-arm prospective study comparing esophagectomy with definitive chemo-radiotherapy. The use of thoracoscopy and/or laparoscopy was decided at the surgeon's discretion. PPCs were defined as one or more of the following postoperative morbidities grade ≥2 (as per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0): pneumonia, atelectasis, and acute respiratory distress syndrome. RESULTS: A total of 379 patients were enrolled in JCOG0502. Of these, 210 patients underwent esophagectomy via thoracotomy with laparotomy (n = 102), thoracotomy with laparoscopy (n = 7), thoracoscopy with laparotomy (n = 43), and thoracoscopy with laparoscopy (n = 58). PPC frequency was reduced to a greater extent by thoracoscopy than by thoracotomy (thoracoscopy 15.8%, thoracotomy 30.3%; p = 0.015). However, following thoracoscopic esophagectomy, laparoscopy failed to further decrease the PPC frequency compared with laparotomy (laparoscopy 15.5%, laparotomy 16.3%; p = 1.00). Univariable analysis showed that thoracoscopy (shown above) and less blood loss (<350 mL 16.3%, ≥350 mL 30.2%; p = 0.022) were associated with PPC prevention, whereas laparoscopy showed a borderline significant association (laparoscopy 15.4%, laparotomy 26.9%; p = 0.079). Multivariable analysis also showed that thoracoscopy and less blood loss were associated with PPC prevention. CONCLUSION: Thoracoscopic approach to esophagectomy significantly reduced PPC frequency with minimal additional effect from laparoscopic gastric mobilization.

Role of metastasectomy for recurrent/metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors based on an analysis of the Kinki GIST registry.

PURPOSE: To define the role of surgery for metastatic/recurrent lesions after resection of primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). METHODS: Based on data obtained from the Kinki GIST registry, patients with recurrence or metastasis were divided into a surgical treatment group (ST group), comprised those treated with surgery in addition to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy; and a drug treatment group (DT group), comprised those treated with TKI therapy alone. We compared the baseline characteristics and survival outcomes of the groups. RESULTS: Metastasis or recurrence developed in 93 of the 737 patients with GISTs treated between 2003 and 2007, 50 (53.8 %) of whom were assigned to the ST group and 43 (46.2 %) to the DT group. In the ST group, the 5-year overall survival rate was significantly higher for patients who underwent R0/R1 resection than for those who underwent R2 resection (82.2 vs. 47.0 %, p = 0.018). Survival time after recurrence was correlated with the duration of total TKI therapy in both the ST and DT groups (r = 0.766 and r = 0.932, respectively, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Continuous TKI therapy appears to be important primarily for the prognostic improvement of patients with recurrent/metastatic GISTs. R0/R1 resection may have benefits when combined with TKI therapy for patients with stable disease or disease responsive to TKI therapy, less than four metastatic lesions, and lesions <100 mm in total.

Short-term surgical outcomes from a phase III study of laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA/IB gastric cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0912.

BACKGROUNDS: No confirmatory randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have evaluated the efficacy of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) compared with open distal gastrectomy (ODG). We performed an RCT to confirm that LADG is not inferior to ODG in efficacy. METHODS: We conducted a multi-institutional RCT. Eligibility criteria included histologically proven gastric adenocarcinoma in the middle or lower third of the stomach, clinical stage I tumor. Patients were preoperatively randomized to ODG or LADG. This study is now in the follow-up stage. The primary endpoint is relapse-free survival (RFS) and the primary analysis is planned in 2018. Here, we compared the surgical outcomes of the two groups. This trial was registered at the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000003319. RESULTS: Between March 2010 and November 2013, 921 patients (LADG 462, ODG 459) were enrolled from 33 institutions. Operative time was longer in LADG than in ODG (median 278 vs. 194 min, p < 0.001), while blood loss was smaller (median 38 vs. 115 ml, p < 0.001). There was no difference in the overall proportion with in-hospital grade 3-4 surgical complications (3.3 %: LADG, 3.7 %: ODG). The proportion of patients with elevated serum AST/ALT was higher in LADG than in ODG (16.4 vs. 5.3 %, p < 0.001). There was no operation-related death in either arm. CONCLUSIONS: This trial confirmed that LADG was as safe as ODG in terms of adverse events and short-term clinical outcomes. LADG may be an alternative procedure in clinical IA/IB gastric cancer if the noninferiority of LADG in terms of RFS is confirmed.

The Prevalence of Overall and Initial Lymph Node Metastases in Clinical T1N0 Thoracic Esophageal Cancer: From the Results of JCOG0502, a Prospective Multicenter Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the sites and frequencies of overall and initial lymph node (LN) metastases (LNMs) of clinical T1N0 esophageal cancer. BACKGROUND: The sites and frequencies of initial LNMs and sentinel LNs (SLNs) of esophageal cancer remain unclear. METHODS: The Japan Clinical Oncology Group JCOG0502 trial was a 4-arm prospective study that compared esophagectomy with chemoradiotherapy for clinical T1N0 esophageal cancer in both randomized and patient-preference arms. The preoperative diagnostic accuracy was evaluated for patients assigned to the surgery arm. Patients who withdrew consent and who were not treated were excluded. All patients underwent esophagectomy with D2 or greater LN dissection. From the pathologic findings, sites and frequencies of LNMs and SLNs were assessed and the frequency of skip LNMs was calculated. RESULTS: In total, 211 patients underwent LNM and SLN analysis. Regarding N-factor accuracy, 57 (27.0%) of 211 clinical N0 cases had pathologic LNMs. The upper mediastinal and mediastinal/abdominal regions were frequent sites of LNMs in upper and lower thoracic cases, respectively. However, in middle thoracic cases, LNMs were observed in the neck, mediastinal, and abdominal regions, and pathologic SLN spread to all 3 fields. The frequency of skip LNMs was 36.7%. CONCLUSIONS: A clinical diagnosis of T1N0 is not sufficiently accurate, and therefore, it is unacceptable to omit LN dissection or minimize the prophylactic radiation field. SLNs, which are not location restricted, should be surveyed in all 3 fields.

A long-surviving case of gastric cancer with main portal vein tumor thrombus after surgical resection and postoperative S-1 therapy.

Gastric cancer patients with main portal vein tumor thrombus usually have a short survival time, owing to its aggressive behavior. Herein, we report a long-surviving case of gastric cancer with main portal vein tumor thrombus. A 78-year-old man presenting with anorexia and body weight loss was diagnosed with gastric cancer. The patient was referred to our hospital for further examination and treatment. Endoscopy revealed a type 3 tumor (8.0 cm in length) in the body of the stomach. Biopsy led to the diagnosis of moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. Enhanced computed tomography revealed a large tumor thrombus extending from the gastric coronary vein to the portal trunk. A total gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy, splenectomy, and thrombectomy was performed. Postoperative chemotherapy with S-1 was administered for 18 months. The patient died a natural death without recurrence at 49 postoperative months. To the best of our knowledge, the patient was the oldest to be diagnosed with gastric cancer with main portal vein tumor thrombus at diagnosis, who survived >36 months. Although gastric cancer with main portal vein tumor thrombus is a rare occurrence, its prognosis is extremely poor. Intensive surgery and long-term chemotherapy may be effective at improving survival time in these patients.