Descriptive epidemiology of COVID-19 in Japan 2020: insights from a multihospital database.

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological data are essential for developing strategies against the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Data on COVID-19 epidemiology in Japan are limited owing to a focus on specific regions and patient groups, particularly in the early phase of the pandemic. METHODS: We investigated COVID-19 epidemiology in Japan in 2020 using a large nationwide multihospital database containing insurance claim records and medical records. Inclusion criteria were inpatient and outpatient referrals for COVID-19 in 2020. We analyzed demographic data, comorbidities, drug use, severe COVID-19 risk, and clinical course of hospitalized patients (including death). RESULTS: We identified 11,868 COVID-19 cases from 56 institutions: 6,440 outpatients and 5,428 inpatients. Of the patients, 53.2% had comorbid conditions, the most common of which was tumor (22.1%), and 56.4% were classed as having a high risk of COVID-19. Pharmacological management patterns were generally consistent between the first and second half of 2020, except for glucocorticoid use. The use of unauthorized medications (hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, and favipiravir) was infrequent. For hospitalized patients, the median length of stay was 10 days, and 2.4% of patients were admitted to intensive care units. Post-COVID-19 all-cause mortality, all-cause 30-day mortality, and in-hospital deaths were recorded for 7.9%, 5.4%, and 4.6% of patients, respectively. Patients with high-risk conditions had a lower survival probability. CONCLUSIONS: This descriptive study of COVID-19 in 2020 identified differences in care across outpatient and inpatient settings and changes in care delivery as the pandemic progressed. These findings could inform strategies for future infectious disease pandemics.

Community-acquired pneumonia: Trends in and research on drug resistance and advances in new antibiotics.

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) refers to infectious inflammation of the lung parenchyma developing outside of a hospital. CAP has quite a high mortality and morbidity rate worldwide, and especially among elderly patients. The increasing burden of CAP is due to antibiotic resistance, the growth of the elderly population, and underlying comorbidities. Streptococcus pneumoniae remains the most common bacterial pathogen causing CAP, but multi-drug resistance bacteria and potential pathogens have increased the difficulty and challenges of managing CAP. Although preventive measures, diagnostic techniques, and treatment strategies are constantly advancing and improving, the susceptibility of multi-drug resistant pathogens, such as including Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, has not improved significantly in recent decades, thus highlighting the importance and necessity of developing new antibiotics for the treatment of CAP. New antimicrobials have been approved over the past few years that will expand treatment options for CAP, and especially for patients with potential comorbidities. This situation also offers the chance to reduce the abuse of antibiotics, their toxicities, and their adverse reactions and to provide effective personalized antibiotic treatment.

The Usefulness of Basic Movement Scale in Hip Fracture Patients: Construct Validity from a Cross-Sectional Study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to investigate the validity of using total score and to examine the constitution and characteristics of the Basic Movement Scale in postsurgery patients with hip fracture. DESIGN: The dimensionality and the threshold difficulty intervals between each score and item difficulty hierarchy of the Basic Movement Scale were examined using factor analysis and Rasch analysis in 37 patients admitted to our hospital between April and November 2015. RESULTS: For factor analysis, the contribution ratio of the first factor was 78.9%, that of the second factor was 6.5%, and there were no items that fit the Rasch analysis. The threshold was reversed at 6 of the 48 locations. The difficulty of the 12 Basic Movement Scale items was distributed roughly evenly among all 9 lots, with some deviation. There was one very easy item, and there were some items almost overlapping in difficulty. CONCLUSIONS: The results showed a unidimensional association between the items and evaluation index. The difficulty threshold of each score was approximated to the interval scale. Therefore, the Basic Movement Scale has evident construct validity and enables quantitative evaluation of physical ability, assessment of the effects of daily training, and general predictions of the feasibility of patients' clinical goals.

Changes in Basic Movement Ability and Activities of Daily Living After Hip Fractures: Correlation Between Basic Movement Scale and Motor-Functional Independence Measure Scores.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the correlation between basic movement ability and activities of daily living (ADL) in elderly patients after hip fracture surgery and predict ADL outcomes from changes in basic movement ability. DESIGN: Fifty-four patients receiving rehabilitation after hip fracture surgery were collected prospectively. Ambulatory ability was evaluated using a Basic Movement Scale (BMS), and ADL was evaluated using the motor subscale of the Functional Independence Measure (motor-FIM). From the results of evaluating BMS and motor-FIM weekly, the important postoperative period to regain ADL was investigated. RESULTS: There was a close correlation between BMS and motor-FIM scores at each evaluation point (r = 0.971, P < 0.001) and a significant correlation between weekly BMS and motor-FIM gains (r = 0.741, P < 0.001). Cluster analysis of BMS scores from postoperative week (POW) 2 to 12 showed three patterns of change, with BMS scores at POW 2 reflecting the outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The very strong correlation between BMS and motor-FIM scores suggests that BMS is a favorable indicator of changes in ADL. Because basic movement ability at POW 2 also reflected the prognosis, constructive interventions should be implemented early to help patients ambulate and regain other basic movements by no later than POW 2.

Staging of mobility, transfer and walking functions of elderly persons based on the codes of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.

BACKGROUND: The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) was introduced by the World Health Organization as a common taxonomy to describe the burden of health conditions. This study focuses on the development of a scale for staging basic mobility and walking functions based on the ICF. METHODS: Thirty-three ICF codes were selected to test their fit to the Rasch model and their location. Of these ICF items, four were used to develop a Guttman- type scale of "basic mobility" and another four to develop a"walking" scale to stage functional performance in the elderly. The content validity and differential item functioning of the scales were assessed. The participants, chosen at random, were Japanese over 65 years old using the services of public long-term care insurance, and whose functional assessments were used for scale development and scale validation. RESULTS: There were 1164 elderly persons who were eligible for scale development. To stage the functional performance of elderly persons, two Guttman-type scales of "basic mobility" and "walking" were constructed. The order of item difficulty was validated using 3260 elderly persons. There is no differential item functioning about study location, sex and age-group in the newly developed scales. These results suggested the newly developed scales have content validity. CONCLUSIONS: These scales divided functional performance into five stages according to four ICF codes, making the measurements simple and less time-consuming and enable clear descriptions of elderly functioning level. This was achieved by hierarchically rearranging the ICF items and constructing Guttman-type scales according to item difficulty using the Rasch model. In addition, each functional level might require similar resources and therefore enable standardization of care and rehabilitation. Illustrations facilitate the sharing of patient images among health care providers. By using the ICF as a common taxonomy, these scales could be used internationally as assessment scales in geriatric care settings. However these scales require further validity and reliability studies for international application.

Health measurement using the ICF: test-retest reliability study of ICF codes and qualifiers in geriatric care.

BACKGROUND: The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) was published by the World Health Organization (WHO) to standardize descriptions of health and disability. Little is known about the reliability and clinical relevance of measurements using the ICF and its qualifiers. This study examines the test-retest reliability of ICF codes, and the rate of immeasurability in long-term care settings of the elderly to evaluate the clinical applicability of the ICF and its qualifiers, and the ICF checklist. METHODS: Reliability of 85 body function (BF) items and 152 activity and participation (AP) items of the ICF was studied using a test-retest procedure with a sample of 742 elderly persons from 59 institutional and at home care service centers. Test-retest reliability was estimated using the weighted kappa statistic. The clinical relevance of the ICF was estimated by calculating immeasurability rate. The effect of the measurement settings and evaluators' experience was analyzed by stratification of these variables. The properties of each item were evaluated using both the kappa statistic and immeasurability rate to assess the clinical applicability of WHO's ICF checklist in the elderly care setting. RESULTS: The median of the weighted kappa statistics of 85 BF and 152 AP items were 0.46 and 0.55 respectively. The reproducibility statistics improved when the measurements were performed by experienced evaluators. Some chapters such as genitourinary and reproductive functions in the BF domain and major life area in the AP domain contained more items with lower test-retest reliability measures and rated as immeasurable than in the other chapters. Some items in the ICF checklist were rated as unreliable and immeasurable. CONCLUSION: The reliability of the ICF codes when measured with the current ICF qualifiers is relatively low. The result in increase in reliability according to evaluators' experience suggests proper education will have positive effects to raise the reliability. The ICF checklist contains some items that are difficult to be applied in the geriatric care settings. The improvements should be achieved by selecting the most relevant items for each measurement and by developing appropriate qualifiers for each code according to the interest of the users.

[Development of a portable fall risk index for elderly people living in the community].

AIM: To develop a portable risk index for falls. METHODS: Risk factors were chosen from previously established factors then we added several environmental factors to the risk index; previous falls in the last 12 month, trippig or stumbling, inability to ascend or descend stairs without help, decreased walking speed, inability to cross a road within the green signal interval, inability to walk 1km without a break, inability to stand on one leg for 5 seconds (eyes open), using a cane, inability to wring out a towel, dizziness or faintness, stooped or rounded back, knee joint pain, visual disturbance, hearing disturbance, cognitive decline, fear of falling, receiving 5 or more prescribed drugs, sensation of darkness at home, obstacles inside, barrier on the carpet or floor, using steps daily at home, steep slopes around home. SUBJECTS: The questionnaire sheet was completed by 2,439 community-dwelling elderly subjects (76.3 +/- 7.4 years old). The frequency of each items of fall risk index was compared between fallers (history of fall within one year) and non-fallers. Multiple regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for previous falls. RESULTS: Except barrier, step use and steep slope around home, all items in the fall risk index were more frequent in fallers. Multivariate analysis revealed that tripping or stumbling, inability to cross a road within the green signal interval, dizziness or faintness, obstacles inside, inability to wring out a towel, cane use and knee joint pain were independent risk factors for previous falls. These 7 selected items were further analyzed as predictors. The maximum sum of sensitivity and specificity was reached at the cut-off point of 2/3 (sensitivity 0.65, specificity 0.72) by receiver operating curve. CONCLUSION: Portable fall risk index is useful for clinical settings to identify high-risk subjects.