Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J ; 51(5): 514-24, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24010865

ABSTRACT

Objective : To clarify the short- and long-term effects of maxillary protraction (MP) in mixed dentition in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). Design : Retrospective study. Setting : University of Tokyo Hospital. Patients and Intervention : Eleven Japanese patients with UCLP in mixed dentition were treated with MP and followed up until the completion of growth. Multibracket treatment had been performed after MP treatment in all patients. Main Outcome Measure : Lateral cephalograms taken before and after MP and after completion of growth were used. Posterior and anterior vertical reference lines (PV, AV) were used to measure the horizontal movements of point A, pogonion, and maxillary first molar (U6). SNA, SNB, ANB, maxillary and mandibular length, mandibular plane angle, Wits value, upper incisor inclination, overjet, and overbite were also measured. Results : Large variation was found in the effects of MP, and five patients eventually required orthognathic surgery. In average change with MP, the maxilla showed favorable forward growth. Point A had moved forward from PV but not AV. The mandible rotated backward. However, ANB and the Wits value did not improve. U6 moved forward, and the overjet improved. After MP, the skeletal Class III relationship became severe. Conclusions : MP was effective as an early treatment for UCLP patients. However, its effects showed large variation and were in conflict with facial growth. Conscientious explanation of the expected effects and associated problems should be given to the patients/parents before its application.


Subject(s)
Cephalometry , Cleft Lip/diagnostic imaging , Cleft Lip/therapy , Cleft Palate/diagnostic imaging , Cleft Palate/therapy , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/therapy , Maxillofacial Development , Alveolar Bone Grafting , Child , Child, Preschool , Cleft Lip/physiopathology , Cleft Palate/physiopathology , Extraoral Traction Appliances , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Orthodontic Appliances , Orthodontics, Interceptive , Orthognathic Surgical Procedures , Treatment Outcome
2.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J ; 50(4): 381-7, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22303937

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) and panoramic radiography in the evaluation of mandibular hypoplasia in patients with hemifacial microsomia (HFM). DESIGN: Retrospective study of imaging data. Setting : Images selected from the archives of the University of Tokyo Hospital. SUBJECTS: Twenty patients with unilateral HFM who had undergone both panoramic radiography and 3D-CT in the same period. METHOD: Mandibular deformities were classified according to the Pruzansky classification; eight patients had Grade I deformity and 12 patients had Grade II deformity. Ramus heights were measured on both panoramic radiographs and 3D-CT. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Magnification in panoramic radiographs and extent of mandibular asymmetry as estimated by the affected/unaffected side ratio based on two methods were examined. The Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient was used to estimate correlations between parameters. RESULTS: The magnification of ramus heights on panoramic radiographs showed large variations in Grade II patients. The affected/unaffected side ratio estimated by the two methods showed a strong correlation in Grade I patients (correlation coefficient 0.99; p < .0001). Conversely, a weak correlation was seen in Grade II patients (correlation coefficient 0.77; p  =  .0036), and affected/unaffected side ratios from panoramic radiographs were both over- and underestimated. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of evaluation using panoramic radiography was fairly reliable in Grade I patients. Conversely, accuracy was poor in Grade II patients, and evaluation using 3D-CT seems preferable. The combination of two methods with careful consideration is recommended for clinical applications.


Subject(s)
Goldenhar Syndrome , Radiography, Panoramic , Facial Asymmetry , Facial Bones , Humans , Mandible/abnormalities , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...