Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Circ J ; 79(8): 1727-32, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25993904

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The incidence of hematoma formation following implantation of a cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) is estimated to be 5% even if a pressure dressing is applied. It is unclear whether a pressure dressing can really compress the pocket in different positions. Furthermore, the adhesive tape for fixing pressure dressings can tear the skin. We developed a new compression tool for preventing hematomas and skin erosions. METHODS AND RESULTS: We divided 46 consecutive patients receiving anticoagulation therapy who underwent CIED implantation into 2 groups (Group I: conventional pressure dressing, Group II: new compression tool). The pressure on the pocket was measured in both the supine and standing positions. The incidence of hematomas was compared between the 2 groups. The pressure differed between the supine and standing positions in Group I, but not in Group II (Group I: 14.8±7.1 mmHg vs. 11.3±9.9 mmHg, P=0.013; Group II: 13.5±2.8 mmHg vs. 13.5±3.5 mmHg, P=0.99). The incidence of hematomas and skin erosions was documented in 2 (8.7%) and 3 (13%) Group I patients, respectively. No complications were documented in Group II. CONCLUSIONS: The new compression tool can provide adequate continuous pressure on the pocket, regardless of body position. This device may reduce the incidence of hematomas and skin erosions after CIED implantation.


Subject(s)
Compression Bandages , Defibrillators, Implantable , Hematoma/prevention & control , Skin Diseases/prevention & control , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...