Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 16(6): e0253396, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34133462

ABSTRACT

Livestock and companion animal health have a direct impact on human health. Research on clinical laboratory technology for veterinary medicine is as important as that on human laboratory technology. Reagents and analysis equipment for human medical laboratory tests are often used in veterinary medicine. Medical laboratories in Japan utilize the Japan Society of Clinical Chemistry (JSCC) method for blood alkaline phosphatase (ALP) analysis. The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) method is used worldwide for ALP catalytic concentration measurement. When the IFCC method is used, human blood ALP activity is approximately one-third of the JSCC method's activity. The JSCC method for ALP measurement was switched to the IFCC method in medical laboratories in Japan in April 2020 for global standardization purpose. It is uncertain whether conventional JSCC method reagents will continue to be supplied. In veterinary medicine, the relationship between the JSCC and IFCC methods in terms of ALP measurement is almost unclear. This study investigated the regression between JSCC and IFCC methods measuring ALP in bovine, canine, feline, and human. The regression formulas for bovine, canine, feline, and human ALP values using the conventional JSCC (x) and IFCC (y) methods are y = 0.379x + 0.124, y = 0.289x + 8.291, y = 0.358x + 0.432, and y = 0.337x + 2.959, respectively. These results suggested that the IFCC method measurement could be estimated by approximately one-third of the JSCC method measurement in animal species such as bovine, canine, and feline. By applying the conversion factors proposed in this study, a very good correlation could be obtained between the two methods for each animal.


Subject(s)
Alkaline Phosphatase/blood , Animals , Cats , Cattle , Chemistry, Clinical/methods , Chemistry, Clinical/standards , Dogs , Humans , Regression Analysis , Societies, Medical/standards , Species Specificity
2.
J Vet Med Sci ; 82(10): 1523-1528, 2020 Oct 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32908039

ABSTRACT

The Japan Society of Clinical Chemistry reference method (JSCC method) is used to measure alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity only in Japan. Other countries use the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) reference method to measure ALP activity. Since April 2020, human medical institutions in Japan have been gradually switching to the IFCC method. However, it is unclear whether the supply of reagents required for the JSCC method will be steady in the future. Additionally, the comparison of the performances and accuracies of these two methods for measuring ALP values remains uncertain in several animal species. In this investigation, we measured canine ALP activity using both methods and developed a formula to interconvert the two resulting values. The regression formula for ALP values measured using the modified JSCC (x) and IFCC (y) methods was determined as log10 y=0.960 log10 x-0.395 (r=0.997). However, the correlation between values based on JSCC and IFCC methods can change depending on the composition of ALP isozymes. Therefore, the developed formula can currently serve as a provisional strategy in calculating ALP levels. Nevertheless, this formula might avoid confusion in the clinical field during the transition from the JSCC to the IFCC method when both measurement values co-exist.


Subject(s)
Alkaline Phosphatase/blood , Chemistry, Clinical/methods , Animals , Dogs , Female , Japan , Male , Reference Standards , Reference Values , Regression Analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...