Impact of contact force on the lesion characteristics of very high-power short-duration ablation using a QDOT-MICRO catheter.

Background: Lesion size is reported to become larger as contact force (CF) increases. However, this has not been systematically evaluated in temperature-guided very high-power short-duration (vHPSD) ablation, which was therefore the purpose of this study. Methods: Radiofrequency applications (90 W/4 s, temperature-control mode) were performed in excised porcine myocardium with four different CFs of 5, 15, 25, and 35 g using QDOT-MICRO™ catheter. Ten lesions for each combination of settings were created, and lesion metrics and steam-pops were compared. Results: A total of 320 lesions were analyzed. Lesion depth, surface area, and volume were smallest for CF of 5 g than for 15, 25, and 35 g (depth: 2.7 mm vs. 2.9 mm, 3.0 mm, 3.15 mm, p < .01; surface area: 38.4 mm2 vs. 41.8 mm2, 43.3 mm2, 41.5 mm2, p < .05; volume: 98.2 mm3 vs. 133.3 mm3, 129.4 mm3, 126.8 mm3, p < .01 for all pairs of groups compared to CF = 5 g). However, no significant differences were observed between CFs of 15-35 g. Average power was highest for CF of 5 g, followed by 15, 25, and 35 g (83.2 W vs. 82.1 W vs. 77.1 W vs. 66.1 W, p < .01 for all pairs), reflecting the higher incidence of temperature-guided power titration with greater CFs (5 g:8.8% vs. 15 g:52.5% vs. 25 g:77.5% vs. 35 g:91.2%, p < .01 for all pairs except for 25 g vs. 35 g). The incidence of steam-pops did not significantly differ between four groups (5 g:3.8% vs. 15 g:10% vs. 25 g:6.2% vs. 35 g:2.5%, not significant for all pairs). Conclusions: For vHPSD ablation, lesion size does not become large once the CF reaches 15 g, and the risk of steam-pops may be mitigated through power titration even in high CFs.

A Single Atrial Extrastimulation Resetting His Bundle During Supraventricular Tachycardia to Differentiate Atrial Tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation is the curative treatment for paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). However, atrial tachycardia (AT) diagnosis is often challenging, especially when SVT is terminated by pacing. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to develop a novel method for AT diagnosis. METHODS: A total of 147 SVTs including 28 ATs, 87 atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardias, and 32 orthodromic reciprocating tachycardias were prospectively studied. Single atrial extrastimulation was performed at the proximal coronary sinus from a coupling interval 20 milliseconds shorter than the tachycardia cycle length and gradually decreased until the His bundle (HB) was first reset and further until the SVT was terminated. The response of the SVT during the first HB resetting and the termination pattern were examined. RESULTS: In 27 of 28 ATs, tachycardia was unaffected when HB resetting whereas, in atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardias or orthodromic reciprocating tachycardias (non-AT), tachycardia was simultaneously reset when HB resetting or was terminated with an atrio-Hisian block. When the coupling interval was further shortened for cases in which tachycardia persisted, all 33 SVTs with tachycardia termination with atrio-Hisian block were non-ATs, whereas 5 ATs and 7 non-ATs were terminated with Hisian-atrial block. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the pattern of tachycardia that was unaffected when HB resetting for AT diagnosis were 96%, 100%, 100%, and 99%, respectively. Those of the pattern of tachycardia termination with atrio-Hisian block for non-AT diagnosis were 92%, 100%, 100%, and 42%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Single atrial extrastimulation from the proximal coronary sinus during tachycardia was useful and effective for AT diagnosis.

Effect of reference electrode on intracardiac electrograms: Close indifferent electrode vs Wilson central terminal.

BACKGROUND: Unipolar electrograms (uni-EGMs) are an essential part of intracardiac mapping. Although Wilson central terminal (WCT) is conventionally used as a reference for signals, avoidance of contamination by far-field and nonphysiologic signals is challenging. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to explore the impact of an intracardiac indifferent reference electrode close to the recording electrodes, in lieu of WCT, on electrograms. METHODS: Sinus node activation was mapped in patients undergoing catheter ablation by a multielectrode array with a close indifferent electrode (CIE) embedded in the distal end of the catheter shaft. An equal number of points was sequentially acquired at each site with use of CIE as a reference first and subsequently with WCT. Uni-EGMs, bipolar EGMs, and the earliest activation area (defined as the area activated in the first 10 ms of the beat) were compared between CIE- and WCT-based activation maps. RESULTS: Seventeen patients (61 ± 18 years; 76% male) were studied. Uni-EGM voltages acquired with CIE were significantly larger than (n = 11) or comparable to (n = 4) those acquired with WCT. When points from the entire cohort were analyzed altogether, unipolar voltages and their maximum negative dV/dT and bipolar voltages recorded with CIE were significantly larger than those recorded with WCT (2.36 [1.42-3.79] mV vs 1.96 [1.25-3.03] mV, P < .0001; 0.40 [0.18-0.77] mV/s vs 0.35 [0.15-0.71] mV/s, P < .0001; and 1.46 [0.66-2.81] mV vs 1.33 [0.54-2.64] mV, P < .0001, respectively). The earliest activation area was significantly smaller in CIE-based activation maps than in WCT-based ones (0.3 [0.7-1.4] cm2 vs 0.6 [1.0-1.8] cm2, P = .01). CONCLUSION: CIE-based maps were associated with an approximately 20% increase in unipolar voltage and may highlight the origin of a focal activation more clearly than WCT-based ones.

Can phrenic nerve injury be anticipated by larger cryoballoons?

Recently, a novel size-adjustable cryoballoon has been introduced in clinical practice, which can be inflated to two different diameters (28 and 31 mm). The 31 mm cryoballoon is specifically designed to achieve better contact with remodeled pulmonary veins (PVs) that have wider ostia while avoiding deep cannulation, thereby potentially reducing the risk of phrenic nerve injury (PNI) associated with deep balloon cannulation. However, we encountered two cases of PNI during cryoballoon ablation using the novel system among our initial 25 consecutive case series. Herein, we present two cases that exhibited PNI during freezing of the right superior PV with a size-adjustable balloon. While larger balloons are expected to create a larger area of isolation, the safety of this novel balloon system needs to be evaluated in a large-scale clinical study.

Transcoronary mapping with an over-the-wire multielectrode catheter in scar-related ventricular tachycardia patients.

AIMS: The usefulness of coronary venous system mapping has been reported for assessing intramural and epicardial substrates in patients with scar-related ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, there has been little data on mapping from coronary arteries. We investigated the safety and utility of mapping from coronary arteries with a novel over-the-wire multielectrode catheter in scar-related VT patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ten consecutive scar-related VT patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy who underwent mapping from a coronary artery were analysed. Six patients underwent simultaneous coronary venous mapping. High-density maps were created by combining the left ventricular endocardium and coronary vessels. Substrate maps were created during the baseline rhythm with 2438 points (IQR 2136-3490 points), including 329 (IQR 59-508 points) in coronary arteries. Abnormal bipolar electrograms were successfully recorded within coronary arteries close to the endocardial substrate in seven patients. During VT, isthmus components were recorded within the coronary vessels in three patients with no discernible isthmus components on endocardial mapping. The ablation terminated the VT from an endocardial site opposite the earliest site in the coronary arteries in five patients. CONCLUSION: The transcoronary mapping with an over-the-wire multielectrode catheter can safely record abnormal bipolar electrograms within coronary arteries. Additional mapping data from the coronary vessels have the potential to assess three-dimensional ventricular substrates and circuit structures in scar-related VT patients.

Safety verification of a novel irrigation catheter with flexible tip of laser-cut kerfs and contact force sensor.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The safety evaluation of TactiFlex, a novel contact-force sensing catheter with a flexible 4-mm tip irrigated through laser-cut kerfs, has been ongoing. This study aimed to verify the safety of this type of catheter. METHODS: Study 1: Radiofrequency (RF) applications at a range of powers (30-50 W), contact forces (10-20 g), and durations (10-60 s) using perpendicular/parallel catheter orientation with half-normal (HNS) or normal saline irrigation were compared between TactiFlex (4-mm tip) and TactiCath (3.5-mm tip) with temperature-controlled mode in excised porcine hearts. Study 2: The relation between RF applications using TactiFlex and the incidence of steam-pops in the real clinical cases were examined. RESULTS: Study-1: 576 RF lesions were examined. TactiFlex demonstrated a significantly lower risk of steam-pops (5[1.7%] vs. 59[20.5%], p < .0001). Compared to 3.5-mm-tip catheter (TactiCath), 4-mm-tip catheter (TactiFlex) produced smaller lesion volume at perpendicular (193[98-554]mm3 vs. 263[139-436]mm3 , p < .0001), but relatively similar lesion volume at parallel contact (243[105-443]mm3 vs. 278[180-440]mm3 , p = .06). HNS-irrigation tended to increase the lesion volume in both catheters and to increase the incidence of steam-pops with TactiCath, but not with TactiFlex. The cut-off value of %impedance-drop ( = absolute impedance-drop/initial impedance) of 20% predicted steam-pops with a sensitivity = 100% and specificity = 89.6% in TactiFlex. Study-2: 5496 RF applications in 84 patients (51AFs/8ATs/3AVNRTs/4AVRTs/17PVCs/4VTs) using TactiFlex were analyzed. Four steam-pops (0.07%) in three patients with pericardial effusion were observed (%impedance-drop = 24%/26%/29%/35%, respectively). The cut-off value of %impedance-drop = 20%, derived from ex-vivo study, showed sensitivity = 100% and specificity = 90.1% in detecting steam-pops. CONCLUSION: TactiFlex reduced the risk of steam-pops than TactiCath. %impedance-drop ≤ 20% may be reasonable for safely use with a sufficient safety margin. For 4-mm-tip catheter, parallel-contact may be recommended for larger lesion creation.

The effect of half-normal saline irrigation on lesion characteristics in temperature-flow-controlled ablation.

PURPOSE: Radiofrequency (RF) ablation with half-normal saline (HNS) irrigation is reported to potentially enlarge local lesion compared to normal saline (NS) in power-controlled ablation (PC-Abl). However, the effect of HNS-irrigation in temperature-flow-controlled ablation (TFC-Abl) on lesion characteristics is unknown. We compared this between TFC-Abl with QDOT-Micro™ catheter and PC-Abl with Thermocool SmartTouch SF™ catheter (STSF). METHODS: RF-application with NS (n = 480) and HNS (n = 480) irrigation were performed on swine myocardium placed in a circulating saline bath. Lesion characteristics without steam-pops under various conditions (target AI, 400/550; ablation power, 30/50 W; contact force, 10/20/30 g; catheter orientation, perpendicular/parallel) were assessed and compared between two irrigants. RESULTS: After matching, 343 lesions without steam-pops in each group were evaluated. In PC-Abl, lesion size did not differ between two groups (NS, 188 ± 97 vs. HNS, 200 ± 95 mm3, p = 0.28 in volume; 33.9 ± 7.3 vs. 34.8 ± 9.5 mm2, p = 0.34 in surface area; and 4.0 ± 1.0 vs. 4.0 ± 1.0 mm, p = 0.81 in depth), but steam-pops were more frequently observed with HNS-irrigation (23.8% vs. 37.9%, p = 0.001). Contrary, in TFC-Abl, HNS-irrigation produced significantly larger (214 ± 106 vs. 243 ± 128 mm3, p = 0.017) and deeper (4.0 ± 1.0 vs. 4.3 ± 1.1 mm, p = 0.002) lesions without increasing the risk of steam-pops (15.0% vs 15.0%, p = 0.99). Automatic temperature-guided titration was more frequently observed in HNS-irrigation (54.8% vs. 78.5%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: TFC-Abl with QDOT-Micro™ catheter utilizing HNS-irrigation might increase volume and depth of local lesion without increasing the risk of stem-pops compared to NS-irrigation. Power-controlled ablation with HNS-irrigation showed similar focal lesion with higher incidence of steam-pops (SPs) compared to normal saline (NS) irrigation. Contrary, temperature-flow-controlled ablation with HNS-irrigation provided larger and deeper lesion than NS-irrigation with similar incidence of SPs. ns, p > 0.05; *, 0.01 < p ≤ 0.05; **, 0.005 < p ≤ 0.01. HNS, half-normal saline; NS, normal saline.

Superiority of the Combination of Input and Output Parameters to the Single Parameter for Lesion Size Estimation.

BACKGROUND: For lesion size prediction, each input parameter, including ablation energy (AE), and output parameter, such as impedance, is individually used. We hypothesize that using both parameters simultaneously may be more optimal.Methods and Results: Radiofrequency applications at a range of power (30-50 W), contact force (10 g and 20 g), duration (10-60 s), and catheter orientation with normal saline (NS)- or half-normal saline (HNS)-irrigation were performed in excised porcine hearts. The correlations, with lesion size of AE, absolute impedance drop (∆Imp-drop), relative impedance drop (%Imp-drop), and AE*%Imp-drop were examined. Lesion size was analyzed in 283 of 288 lesions (NS-irrigation, n=142; HNS-irrigation, n=141) without steam pops. AE*%Imp-drop consistently showed the strongest correlations with lesion maximum depth (NS-irrigation, ρ=0.91; HNS-irrigation, ρ=0.94), surface area (NS-irrigation, ρ=0.87; HNS-irrigation, ρ=0.86), and volume (NS-irrigation, ρ=0.94; HNS-irrigation, ρ=0.94) compared with the other parameters. Moreover, compared with AE alone, AE*%Imp-drop significantly improved the strength of correlation with lesion maximum depth (AE vs. AE*%Imp-drop, ρ=0.83 vs. 0.91, P<0.01), surface area (ρ=0.73 vs. 0.87, P<0.01), and volume (ρ=0.84 vs. 0.94, P<0.01) with NS-irrigation. This tendency was also observed with HNS-irrigation. Parallel catheter orientation showed a better correlation with lesion depth and volume using ∆Imp-drop, %Imp-drop, and AE*%Imp-drop than perpendicular orientation. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of input and output parameters is more optimal than each single parameter for lesion prediction.

Effect of isolation feasibility of non-pulmonary vein foci on efficacy of ablation for atrial fibrillation: comparison of the isolation and focal ablation methods.

PURPOSE: Atrial fibrillation (AF) mainly originates from the pulmonary vein (PV). However, some AF triggers originate from other sites, namely non-PV foci, which are related to recurrence after AF ablation. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of isolation feasibility (isolability) of non-PV foci on the efficacy of AF ablation. METHODS: Overall, 1855 patients with AF (age, 64.6 ± 10.9 years; 82% paroxysmal) underwent PV isolation, followed by induction and ablation of non-PV foci. Among them, 545 (29%) patients had non-PV foci; these patients were categorized into those with isolable non-PV foci (n = 196, 36%) and those with non-isolable non-PV foci (n = 349, 64%). RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 31.2 ± 15.6 months, recurrence was higher in the non-isolable group than in the isolable group (34% vs. 19%, P < 0.01). Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed a significantly better 1-year clinical outcome in the isolable group than in the non-isolable group (88.0% vs. 78.4%, P < 0.001; hazard ratio (HR), 0.56; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.39-0.81). This outcome was not inferior to that of patients without non-PV foci (88.3% vs. 90.8%, P = 0.81). The non-isolable group showed poorer clinical outcomes than patients without non-PV foci (78.4% vs. 90.8%, P < 0.001; HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.22-1.53). Cox regression analysis revealed that isolability (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.36-0.89) and unmappability (HR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.55-5.37) of non-PV foci were significant predictors of arrhythmia recurrence. CONCLUSION: The isolability of non-PV foci was a significant factor affecting the achievement of better clinical outcomes following AF ablation in patients with non-PV foci.

Optimal single procedure strategy of pulmonary vein isolation with cryoballoon or radiofrequency and non-pulmonary vein triggers ablation for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Background: Limited data exist on pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using cryoballoon (CB) or radiofrequency (RF) ablation and additional non-pulmonary vein trigger ablation for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (non-PAF). We aimed to assess the outcomes of first-stage catheter ablation for non-PAF patients. Methods: Initial PVI was performed on 734 non-PAF patients (age: 64 ± 10 years; male: 584 (80%)) between September 2014 and June 2018 [315 (43%), CB ablation; 419 (57%), RF catheter]. A logistic regression model was used to match 257 pairs (514 patients) according to the propensity scores (CB or RF group). After PVI, additional non-PV trigger ablation was performed if induced by isoproterenol. We analysed the clinical outcomes of both groups. Results: The mean procedural time was significantly shorter in the CB group (125 [range, 89-165] min) than in the RF group (190 [160-224] min; P < 0.001). The 1-year Kaplan-Meier event rate revealed similar atrial fibrillation-free survival rates between the two groups (CB: 77.9%, RF: 82.3%; log-rank P = 0.111). The additional ablation percentage for non-PV foci (CB: 39%, RF: 41%; P = 0.653) and complication incidence (CB: 5%, RF: 4%; P = 0.670) were also similar. Conclusions: In non-PAF patients, the combination strategy of PVI using CB or RF ablation and non-PV trigger ablation achieved comparable outcomes.

Impact of diagnosis-to-ablation time on non-pulmonary vein triggers and ablation outcomes in persistent atrial fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: Non-pulmonary vein (PV) triggers are a major cause of atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) recurrence after catheter ablation. However, the effect of the diagnosis-to-ablation time (DAT) on non-PV triggers in persistent atrial fibrillation is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: This observational study evaluated 502 consecutive persistent AF patients who underwent initial ablation. We compared 408 patients whose DAT was <3 years with 94 patients whose DAT was ≥3 years. Following PV and posterior wall isolation, 193 non-PV triggers, including 50 AFs, 30 atrial tachycardias (ATs), and 113 repetitive atrial premature beats, were elicited and ablated in 137 (27%) patients. Specifically, 80 non-PV AF/AT triggers were provoked in 64 (13%) patients, being identified more frequently in the DAT ≥ 3 years group than in the DAT < 3 years group (20% vs. 11%, p = .025) especially with a higher prevalence of coronary sinus/inferior left atrial triggers. During a median follow-up of 770 days, the ATA recurrence-free rate was higher in the DAT < 3 years group than the DAT ≥ 3 years group (79% vs. 53% at 2 years, p < .001). In a multivariate analysis, female sex (odds ratio: 2.70, p = .002) and a longer DAT (odds ratio: 1.13/year, p = .008) were predictors of non-PV AF/AT triggers, and a longer DAT (hazard ratio: 1.12/year, p < .001) and non-PV AT/AF triggers (hazard ratio: 1.79, p = .009) were associated with ATA recurrence. CONCLUSION: Early ablation after the first diagnosis of persistent AF may reduce emerging non-PV AF/AT triggers and ATA recurrence.

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with congestive heart failure.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the 1-year success rate of maintaining sinus rhythm after catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with or without congestive heart failure (CHF). METHODS: In this single-centre retrospective matched-pair cohort study of 3,018 AF patients who underwent initial CA between January 2012 and June 2018, 227 pairs with (CHF group) or without CHF (control group) were matched using propensity scores. In the CHF group, 108 patients were assigned to the arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy (AIC) group whose left ventricular systolic dysfunction was explained only by lasting AF or atrial tachycardia; the remaining 119 had organic heart diseases (non-AIC group). We evaluated the 1-year AF-free survival and changes in clinical findings before and after CA. RESULTS: The CHF and control groups showed similar AF-free survival; however, AIC patients had significantly better survival than non-AIC patients. AF recurrence was significantly related to CHF re-hospitalisation, which was significantly more frequent in the non-AIC group than in the AIC group. The clinical outcomes of left atrial dilation, brain natriuretic peptide level, and left ventricular ejection function improved significantly before and after CA in both groups. The degree of improvement was significantly better in the AIC group than in the non-AIC group. CONCLUSIONS: The 1-year success rate was not significantly different between the CHF and control groups. The 1-year success rate in the AIC group was similar to that in the AIC-control group and was better than that in the non-AIC group. CHF clinical outcomes were improved significantly.

Presence of non-pulmonary vein foci in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing standard ablation of pulmonary vein isolation: Clinical characteristics and long-term ablation outcome.

BACKGROUND: The clinical characteristics of atrial fibrillation (AF) resulting from non-pulmonary vein (PV) triggers remain unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics of patients with AF caused by non-PV triggers, localization of non-PV foci, clinical differences, and clinical outcomes after catheter ablation in each AF focus. METHODS: A total of 2967 patients who underwent initial catheter ablation for paroxysmal or persistent AF were examined. After PV isolation, all patients underwent high-dose isoproterenol infusion to assess the existence of non-PV foci. RESULTS: Non-PV foci were identified in 564 patients (19.2%). The localization of successfully ablated non-PV foci in 514 patients were the superior vena cava (SVC: 213 cases), interatrial septum (IAS: 125 cases), coronary sinus (CS: 98 cases), right atrium (RA: 125 cases), left atrium (LA: 114 cases), and unmappable (50 cases). Multivariate analysis revealed that female gender, low body mass index (BMI), non-paroxysmal AF (PAF), and sick sinus syndrome were independent and significant indicators of non-PV foci. In the multivariate analysis of each AF focus, female gender, low BMI, and non-PAF were significant predictors of IAS and CS foci, RA and IAS foci, and CS foci, respectively. In addition, dilatation of the LA was significantly associated with LA foci, whereas RA, LA, IAS, and CS foci were associated with AF recurrence. CONCLUSION: These findings could help to identify patients at a higher risk of AF caused by non-PV triggers and clarify the clinical difference according to the localization of non-PV foci.

Association between the locations of non-pulmonary vein triggers and ablation outcomes in repeat procedures after cryoballoon ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

PURPOSE: We examined the characteristics of non-pulmonary vein (PV) triggers in repeat ablation after cryoballoon ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). METHODS: This study evaluated 119 patients undergoing a second ablation procedure for recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) after cryoballoon PV isolation (CB-PVI) for PAF. RESULTS: Fifty-three of 119 (45%) patients had PV reconnection. All reconnected PVs were isolated. No non-PV triggers were elicited in 42/119 (35%) patients (NNPV group). In 77/119 (65%) patients, 139 isoproterenol-induced non-PV triggers, including 45 triggers that initiated AF, were identified. Non-PV triggers initiating AF were observed at the superior vena cava (SVC), left atrial posterior wall (LAPW) including the PV antra, interatrial septum, right atrium, left atrial appendage/mitral anulus, and coronary sinus in 14 (12%), 10 (8%), 8 (7%), 7 (6%), 4 (3%), and 2 (2%) patients, respectively. Non-PV triggers originated from only the SVC and/or LAPW including the PV antra, and the SVC and/or LAPW was isolated in 18/119 (15%) patients (SVC/LAPW group). Non-PV triggers originating from other sites were focally ablated in 59/119 (50%) patients (OS group). During a median 461 days of follow-up, 39/42 (93%), 17/18 (94%), and 38/59 (64%) patients in the NNPV, SVC/LAPW, and OS groups, respectively, remained ATA recurrence-free. The recurrence rate was higher in the OS group than in the NNPV (P = 0.005) or SVC/LAPW groups (P = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS: Over half of patients had non-PV triggers at subsequent ablation after CB-PVI. Non-PV triggers from the SVC/LAPW can be eliminated more successfully than triggers from other sites.

The impact of left atrium size on selection of the pulmonary vein isolation method for atrial fibrillation: Cryoballoon or radiofrequency catheter ablation.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone of ablation strategies for atrial fibrillation (AF), and noninferiority of cryoballoon (CB) over radiofrequency (RF) ablation has been previously reported. One of the risk factors of recurrence is left atrium (LA) enlargement. This study aimed to analyze the impact of LA enlargement on the selection of CB or RF ablation for AF patients. METHODS: A total of 2,224 AF patients (64.4 ±â€¯10.7 years, 65.5% male) who underwent PVI were analyzed retrospectively. Left atrial diameter (LAD) and volume (LAV) were measured using echocardiography before the procedures. LA enlargement was defined as LAD ≥40 mm and LAV index (LAVI) ≥35 mL/m2. Patients undergoing CB and RF ablation were propensity score matched, and 376 matched pairs were evaluated. RESULTS: Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed that LAD (95% CI, 1.01-1.05), LAV (95% CI, 1.01-1.02), and LAVI (95% CI, 1.01-1.03) were independent predictors of recurrence. CB showed equivalent clinical outcomes to those of RF with shorter procedure time required for patients without LA enlargement. CB was inferior to RF in patients with LA enlargement (LAD, 74.5% vs 84.6%, P = .028; LAVI, 74.7% vs 83.4%, P = .015), and large LAVI was associated with a higher prevalence of non-PV foci (35% vs 29%, P = .008). CONCLUSIONS: CB ablation may be recommended for patients without enlarged LA based on the short procedure time and efficacy, whereas RF would be more appropriate in large LAs. LAVI may be a valuable reference to predict PVI outcomes and in selecting the ablation method.

Cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in hemodialysis patients.

INTRODUCTION: Little evidence exists regarding cryoballoon ablation (CBA) of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) in hemodialysis (HD) patients. We compared CBA and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of PAF in HD patients, referring to CBA of PAF in non-HD patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: This historical cohort study examined 88 patients who underwent catheter ablation of PAF, including 21 HD patients with a second-generation 28-mm cryoballoon (CB-HD group), 17 HD patients with a non-force-sensing radiofrequency catheter (RF-HD group), and 50 non-HD patients with a cryoballoon (CB-non-HD group). Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation alone aside from cavotricuspid isthmus ablation was performed in 14 (67%) in the CB-HD group, 12 (71%) in the RF-HD group, and 36 (72%) in the CB-non-HD group (P = 0.95), without isoproterenol-induced non-PV triggers. Non-PV trigger ablation was added to the other patients. The Kaplan-Meier estimated 1-year freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence without antiarrhythmic drugs after a single procedure was 76%, 59%, and, 92% in the CB-HD, RF-HD, and CB-non-HD groups, respectively (P = 0.002). The mean procedure time was shorter in the CB-HD group than in the RF-HD group (127 vs. 199 min; P < 0.001). In the second procedure, the median number of reconnected pulmonary veins was 0.5 in the CB-HD group versus 2.0 in the RF-HD group (P = 0.17). CONCLUSION: For PAF in HD patients, CBA showed a comparable single-procedure efficacy to that of RFA with a short procedure time. CBA may be a reasonable initial procedure for HD patients suffering from symptomatic PAF.

The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score predicts mortality and neurological outcome in patients with post-cardiac arrest syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Patients experiencing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and subsequent post-cardiac arrest syndrome are often compromised by multi-organ failure. The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score has been used to predict clinical outcome of patients requiring intensive care for multi-organ failure. Thus, the assessment of SOFA score is recommended as a criterion for sepsis. Although post-cardiac arrest patients frequently develop sepsis-like status in ICU, there are limited reports evaluating the SOFA score in post-cardiac arrest patients. We investigated the predictive value of the SOFA score in survival and neurological outcomes in patients with post-cardiac arrest syndrome. METHODS: A total of 231 cardiovascular arrest patients achieving return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) were finally extracted from the institutional consecutive database comprised of 1218 OHCA patients transferred to the institution between January 2015 and July 2018. The SOFA score was calculated on admission and after 48h. Predictors of survival and neurological outcome defined as having cerebral-performance-category (CPC) 1 or 2 at 30 days were determined. RESULTS: SOFA score was lower in survived patients (5.0 vs 10.0, p<0.001) and those with favorable neurological outcome (5.0 vs 8.0, p<0.001) as compared with the counterparts. The SOFA score on admission was an independent predictor of survival (OR 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.78; p<0.001) and favorable neurological performance (OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.69-0.90; p<0.001) at 30 days. Furthermore, a change in SOFA score (48-0h) was predictive of favorable 30-day neurological outcome (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.60-0.85; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of the SOFA score in the ICU is useful to predict survival and neurological outcome in post-cardiac arrest patients.

One-year outcomes after pulmonary vein isolation plus posterior wall isolation and additional non-pulmonary vein trigger ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation with or without contact force sensing: a propensity score-matched comparison.

PURPOSE: Whether or not pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) plus left atrial posterior wall isolation (PWI) using contact force (CF) sensing improves the ablation outcome for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) is unclear. This study compared the outcome of PVI plus PWI and additional non-PV trigger ablation for persistent AF with/without CF sensing. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 148 propensity score-matched persistent AF patients (median duration of persistent AF, 8 months (interquartile range, 3-24 months); left atrial diameter, 43 ± 7 mm) undergoing PVI plus PWI and ablation of non-PV triggers provoked by high-dose isoproterenol, including 74 with CF-sensing catheters (CF group) and 74 with conventional catheters (non-CF group). PVI plus PWI with no additional ablation but cavotricuspid isthmus ablation was performed without non-PV triggers in 48 CF patients (65%) and 54 non-CF patients (73%) (P = 0.38). In all other patients, we performed additional ablation of provoked non-PV triggers. RESULTS: The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the rate of freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence off antiarrhythmic drugs at 12 months after the single procedure was higher in the CF group than in the non-CF group (85 vs. 70%, log-rank P = 0.030). A multivariable analysis revealed that using CF sensing and non-inducibility of AF from a non-PV trigger after PVI and PWI were significantly associated with a reduced rate of atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with non-CF sensing, PVI plus PWI and additional non-PV trigger ablation using CF-sensing catheters for persistent AF can reduce the rate of atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence.

Characteristics of the nonpulmonary vein foci induced after second-generation cryoballoon ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using cryoballoon is effective for patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF); however, few reports have evaluated the non-pulmonary vein (PV) foci after cryoballoon ablation. We aimed to evaluate the characteristics of non-PV foci and predictors of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after cryoballoon ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a single-center retrospective study of 647 patients with PAF who underwent initial PVI using a second-generation cryoballoon. After PVI, all patients underwent high-dose isoproterenol infusion to assess the existence of non-PV foci. Non-PV foci were observed in 211 patients (32.6%), which were most frequently observed in the superior vena cava. Higher age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.00-1.04; P = .025), female sex (OR = 1.65; 95% CI = 1.13-2.41; P = .009), and lower body mass index (OR = 0.95; 95% CI = 0.89-1.00; P = .049) were significantly associated with non-PV foci. The existence of non-PV foci was an independent predictor of AF recurrence (Hazard's ratio = 1.70; 95% CI = 1.12-2.60; P = .014). When non-PV foci were mappable and successfully ablated, patients with non-PV foci showed similar outcomes with those without non-PV foci (1-year AF-free survival rates of 88.5% vs 91.5%; P = .338). Conversely, when we failed to detect and eliminate non-PV foci because they had multiple origins and were not consistently inducible (multichanging non-PV foci), the 1-year AF-free survival rate was 56.4% even after substrate modification. CONCLUSION: Non-PV foci were observed in one-third of patients with PAF after cryoballoon ablation and were associated with AF recurrence. Catheter ablation for non-PV foci was effective when they were mappable; however, multichanging non-PV foci were associated with worse prognosis.

Differences in the electrophysiological findings of repeat ablation between patients who first underwent cryoballoon ablation and radiofrequency catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: Several studies have revealed that second-generation cryoballoon (CB)-based pulmonary vein (PV) isolation is noninferior to radiofrequency (RF)-based PV isolation for patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). However, electrophysiological differences in repeat ablation remain unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study examined electrophysiological differences during the repeat ablation between patients who first underwent RF catheter ablation and CB ablation; PV durability and non-PV AF foci were assessed for these patients. We enrolled 919 and 491 patients who underwent CB ablation (CB group) and RF catheter ablation (RF group), respectively, for paroxysmal AF between January 2013 and June 2017 at our institution. PV isolation using RF ablation involved the left atrium (LA) antrum and part of the LA posterior wall. After 2 years of follow-up, 62 and 80 patients in the CB and RF groups, respectively, underwent repeat ablation. PV reconnections were more frequent in the RF group than in the CB group (left superior PV: 46.2% and 14.5%, P < .001; left inferior PV: 35.0% and 11.2%, P = .001; right superior PV: 40.0% and 22.6%, P = .031; right inferior PV: 36.2% and 19.4%, P = .039; PVs: 39.8% and 16.9%, P < .001). LA AF foci were more frequent in the CB group than in the RF group (27.4% and 7.5%; P = .002). Other non-PV foci were prevalent in both groups. CONCLUSION: Fewer LA-PV reconnections occurred with CB ablation. However, extensive PV isolation may eliminate many LA AF foci.