In vitro and in vivo activities of KSP-1007, a broad-spectrum inhibitor of serine- and metallo-ß-lactamases, in combination with meropenem against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria.

KSP-1007 is a novel bicyclic boronate-based broad-spectrum ß-lactamase inhibitor and is being developed in combination with meropenem (MEM) for the treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, a global health concern, and here, we describe its characteristics. KSP-1007 exhibited low apparent inhibition constant (Ki app) values against all classes of ß-lactamase, including imipenemase types and oxacillinase types from Acinetobacter baumannii. Against 207 Enterobacterales and 55 A. baumannii, including carbapenemase producers, KSP-1007 at fixed concentrations of 4, 8, and 16 µg/mL dose-dependently potentiated the in vitro activity of MEM in broth microdilution MIC testing. The MIC90 of MEM/KSP-1007 at 8 µg/mL against Enterobacterales was lower than those of MEM/vaborbactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam, and colistin and similar to those of aztreonam/avibactam, cefiderocol, and tigecycline. The in vitro activity of MEM/KSP-1007 at ≥4 µg/mL against Enterobacterales harboring metallo-ß-lactamase was superior to that of cefepime/taniborbactam. MEM/KSP-1007 showed excellent activity against Escherichia coli with PBP3 mutations and New Delhi metallo-ß-lactamase compared to aztreonam/avibactam, cefepime/taniborbactam, and cefiderocol. MEM/KSP-1007 at 8 µg/mL showed greater efficacy against A. baumannii than these comparators except for cefiderocol, tigecycline, and colistin. A 2-fold reduction in MEM MIC against 96 Pseudomonas aeruginosa was observed in combination with KSP-1007. MEM/KSP-1007 demonstrated bactericidal activity against carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales, A. baumannii, and P. aeruginosa based on minimum bactericidal concentration/MIC ratios of ≤4. KSP-1007 enhanced the in vivo activity of MEM against carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales, A. baumannii, and P. aeruginosa in murine systemic, complicated urinary tract, and thigh infection models. Collectively, MEM/KSP-1007 has a good profile for treating carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections.

SARS-CoV-2 Contamination on Healthy Individuals' Hands in Community Settings During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Introduction Hand hygiene is an infection control measure for COVID-19 in our daily lives; however, the contamination levels of SARS-CoV-2 in the hands of healthy individuals remain unclear. Thus, we aimed to evaluate SARS-CoV-2 contamination levels by detecting viral RNA and viable viruses in samples obtained from the hands of 925 healthy individuals. Methods Swab samples were collected from the palms and fingers of healthy participants, including office workers, public officers, university students, university faculty and staff, and hospital staff between December 2022 and March 2023. The collected swab samples were analyzed using reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection. Viral RNA-positive samples were subjected to plaque assay to detect viable viruses. Results We collected 1,022 swab samples from the hands of healthy participants. According to the criteria for data collection, 97 samples were excluded, and 925 samples were analyzed using RT-qPCR. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in three of the 925 samples. The viral RNA detection rate was 0.32% (3/925), and the viral RNA copy numbers ranged from 5.0×103 to 1.7×105 copies/mL. The RT-qPCR-positive samples did not contain viable viruses, as confirmed by the plaque assay results. Conclusions The detection rate of SARS-CoV-2 RNA from the hands of healthy individuals was extremely low, and no viable viruses were detected. These results suggest that the risk of contact transmission via hands in a community setting is extremely rare.

Fluctuation in SARS-CoV-2 Environmental Surface Contamination Levels in Homes Where Patients With COVID-19 Stayed for Recuperation.

Introduction Transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) often occurs among family members. Elucidating where viable SARS-CoV-2 virions, and not just residual viral RNA, are present in the house is necessary to prevent the further spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We aimed to evaluate the environmental surface contamination levels of both SARS-CoV-2 RNA and viable viruses in the homes of housebound patients with COVID-19. Methods Environmental samples were collected from the households of three patients in April and July 2022 when the number of new COVID-19 cases in Japan was reported to be approximately 50,000 and 200,000 cases per day, respectively. For each case, samples were obtained from 19-26 household sites for seven consecutive days. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was examined in 455 samples through reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), and RT-qPCR-positive samples were subjected to plaque assay to detect viable viruses. Results Among the 455 samples, 63 (13.8%) that were collected from patients' pillows and comforters, doorknobs, chairs, and refrigerators tested positive by RT-qPCR. The maximum detection rate of SARS-CoV-2 RNA-positive samples in each case ranged from 20.0% to 57.7% on days 1 to 3. The detection rate gradually decreased to 0-5.3% as the days elapsed. Although all RT-qPCR-positive samples were examined, no viable viruses were detected in these samples. Conclusions Although environmental contamination of SARS-CoV-2 RNA was observed in the homes of housebound patients with COVID-19, no viable viruses were isolated. This suggests that the indirect transmission risk from fomites was low.

Levels of environmental contamination with SARS-CoV-2 in hospital rooms and salivary viral loads of patients with coronavirus disease 2019.

BACKGROUND: Clarifying the presence of viable severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) rather than SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA in inpatient rooms is important for infection control of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In this study, we investigated levels of viral RNA and viable virus on environmental surfaces and in patient saliva. METHODS: Environmental samples from 23 sites in hospital rooms were collected every other day until patient discharge. Saliva specimens and samples from the inner surface of patient masks were also collected. Additionally, environmental samples were collected from 46 sites in hospital rooms on discharge day. The samples were examined using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and plaque assays. RESULTS: The 10 enrolled cases were classified as mild COVID-19, and patients were discharged after 6-9 days. The viral RNA was detected in 12.4% (105/849) of serially collected environmental samples during hospitalization, whereas viable virus was detected only in 0.47% (4/849), which were from sinks and tap levers. Although all patients recovered, three cases retained viable virus in the last saliva specimen collected. In the 15 discharged rooms, viral RNA was detected in 6.6% (45/682) of the samples, and viable virus was detected in only one sample from the sink. CONCLUSIONS: Although environmental surfaces surrounding patients with COVID-19 were frequently contaminated with viral RNA, the presence of viable virus was rare and limited only to areas around sinks. These results suggest that contact infection risk via fomites in hospital rooms is extremely rare.

Assessment of environmental surface contamination with SARS-CoV-2 in concert halls and banquet rooms in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Although crowds are considered to be a risk factor for SARS-CoV-2 transmission, little is known about the changes in environmental surface contamination with the virus when a large number of people attend an event. In this study, we evaluated the changes in environmental surface contamination with SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: Environmental samples were collected from concert halls and banquet rooms before and after events in February to April 2022 when the 7-day moving average of new COVID-19 cases in Tokyo was reported to be 5000-18000 cases per day. In total, 632 samples were examined for SARS-CoV-2 by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) tests, and RT-qPCR-positive samples were subjected to a plaque assay. RESULTS: The SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection rate before and after the events ranged from 0% to 2.6% versus 0%-5.0% in environmental surface samples, respectively. However, no viable viruses were isolated from all RT-qPCR-positive samples by the plaque assay. There was no significant increase in the environmental surface contamination with SARS-CoV-2 after these events. CONCLUSIONS: These findings revealed that indirect contact transmission from environmental fomite does not seem to be of great magnitude in a community setting.