Mutational screening of ACVR1 gene in Brazilian fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva patients.

Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is a severe genetic disorder reported worldwide. A specific heterozygous mutation (c.617G> A; p.R206H) in the activin A type I receptor gene (ACVR1) is regarded as the genetic cause of FOP in all classically affected individuals worldwide. However, a few patients with FOP variants harbor distinct mutations in ACVR1. We screened a group of FOP Brazilian population for mutations in ACVR1. Of 16 patients with a classic FOP phenotype (10 males and 6 females, age range of 3-42 years), all had the classic mutation (p.R206H). One 21-year-old woman with a variant FOP phenotype had the previously reported c.983G> A mutation (p.G328E). Our study contributes to the understanding of the predominant FOP phenotype and genotype and suggests that variant FOP phenotypes are associated with specific mutations in ACVR1 gene.

Clinical diagnosis of heterozygous dystrophin gene deletions by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Two-thirds of patients affected by Duchenne or Becker muscular dystrophy (DMD/BMD) carry large intra-genic deletions in the dystrophin gene. In males, the deletions can be efficiently detected using multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Southern blotting. In contrast, deletion detection in carrier females is complicated by the presence of a normal gene copy on the second X-chromosome. We have analyzed the boundaries of 570 deletions and 34 duplications in the dystrophin gene identified in the São Paulo and Leiden diagnostic laboratories. The data were used to select an optimal set of cosmid probes for the detection of the most frequently deleted areas of the dystrophin gene. Six cosmids were evaluated in fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) experiments to assess deletions in 21 heterozygous deletion-carriers and nine controls. No discrepancy was found between the FISH analysis and the molecular data, demonstrating the accuracy of the technique for carrier detection in Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy.

Novel point mutations in the dystrophin gene.

Duchenne (DMD) and Becker (BMD) type muscular dystrophies are allelic X-linked recessive disorders caused by mutations in the gene encoding dystrophin. About 65% of the cases are caused by deletions, while 5-10% are duplications. The remaining 30% of affected individuals may have smaller mutations (point mutations or small deletions/insertions) which cannot be identified by current diagnostic screening strategies. In order to look for pathogenic small mutations in the dystrophin gene, we have screened the 18 exons located in the hot spot region of this gene through two different single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) conditions. Five different pathogenic mutations were identified in 6 out of 192 DMD/BMD patients without detectable deletions: 2 nonsense, 1 bp insertion, 1 bp deletion and 1 intronic. Except for the intronic change, which alters a splice site, all the others cause a premature stop codon. In addition, 8 apparently neutral changes were identified. However, interestingly, one of them was not identified in 195 normal chromosomes, although it was previously described in a DMD patient from a different population. The possibility that this mutation may be pathogenic is discussed. Except for two neutral changes, all the others are apparently here described for the first time.

Why is the reproductive performance lower in Becker (BMD) as compared to limb girdle (LGMD) muscular dystrophy male patients?

We had previously reported that patients affected with BMD have a significantly reduced reproductive performance (f = 0.12) as compared to male LGMD patients of similar age and physical impairment (f = 0.98). In the present study parameters such as the socio-economic level, as well as psychosocial, intellectual, and psychiatric functionings could not explain the low fitness of BMD patients. The effect of genetic counseling, a greater difficulty in coping with the disease, and relating to women and/or a potential malfunction of reproductive physiology are discussed as possible causes.

Intrafamilial variability in dystrophin abundance correlated with difference in the severity of the phenotype.

In Duchenne muscular dystrophy, the progression of the disease is always severe and predictable, while in Becker dystrophy there is a wide variability (intra and inter familial) in the severity of the phenotype. We report here a family in which the proband, who is currently 15 years old, is showing a severe DMD progression, while his affected maternal uncle, aged 29, has a more benign course, compatible with BMD. No DNA deletion was detected in both patients. Dystrophin analysis through immunofluorescence and western blotting showed a negative pattern in the youngest patient and a positive one in the oldest. Apparently, this is the first report on intrafamilial variability in dystrophin abundance correlated with a difference in the severity of the phenotype.

Severe nonspecific X-linked mental retardation caused by a proximally Xp located gene: intragenic heterogeneity or a new form of X-linked mental retardation?

X-linked mental retardation (XLMR) can be subdivided into syndromic and nonsyndromic or nonspecific. Patients with non-syndromal XLMR show no characteristic manifestations, biochemical defects, or distinct fragile sites. Nevertheless, nonspecific XLMR seems to be heterogeneous. To determine the number and location of the genes responsible for XLMR, linkage studies in large pedigrees have to be performed. Here we report the data of linkage analysis in a large Brazilian family with 7 patients affected by a severe form of XLMR, with no other associated malformations. All the obligate carriers are normal. A close linkage without recombination (lod scores 1.95 and 3.25) was found between the disease locus and polymorphic DNA loci DXS255 (Xp11.22), DXS14 (Xp11.21). These results suggest that the gene responsible for the disease in this family maps in the Xp11-cent of the X chromosome. Positive lod scores in this region have also been reported for other XLMR genealogies, but with a much milder phenotype. The possibility of intragenic or locus heterogeneity is discussed.

Is the maintainance of the C-terminus domain of dystrophin enough to ensure a milder Becker muscular dystrophy phenotype?

The severe Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and the more benign Becker type (BMD) are allelic conditions, controlled by a defective gene at Xp21, caused by the absence (DMD) or a defect in quantity or quality (BMD) of the protein dystrophin. It has been suggested that the C-terminus domain of dystrophin is fundamental to ensure the proper protein sub-cellular localization and function. We wish to report our dystrophin findings in 4 among 142 DMD patients studied for DNA deletions and dystrophin analysis. Although they have a severe clinical course, a positive dystrophin immunofluorescence pattern was seen using C-terminal antibody, and a dystrophin band of reduced molecular weight (corresponding to their DNA deletions), but which maintained the C-terminus was seen through Western blot (WB). Based on these findings, we suggest that in order to partially maintain its function, resulting in a milder phenotype, dystrophin may carry large internal deletions but in addition to the C-terminus, the region encompassing both the N-terminus and the proximal region of the rod domain cannot be absent. Therefore, the prognosis of a Becker phenotype in a young patient should be done with caution if based only on the presence or not of dystrophin.

Different mosaicism frequencies for proximal and distal Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) mutations indicate difference in etiology and recurrence risk.

In about 65% of the cases of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) a partial gene deletion or duplication in the dystrophin gene can be detected. These mutations are clustered at two hot spots: 30% at the hot spot in the proximal part of the gene and about 70% at a more distal hot spot. Unexpectedly we observed a higher frequency of proximal gene rearrangements among proved "germ line" mosaic cases. Of the 24 mosaic cases we are aware of, 19 (79%) have a proximal mutation, while only 5 (21%) have a distal mutation. This finding indicates that the mutations at the two hot spots in the dystrophin gene differ in origin. Independent support for the different mosaicism frequency was found by comparing the mutation spectra observed in isolated cases of DMD and familial cases of DMD. In a large two-center study of 473 patients from Brazil and the Netherlands, we detected a significant difference in the deletion distribution of isolated (proximal:distal ratio 1:3) and familial cases (ratio 1:1). We conclude from these data that proximal deletions most likely occur early in embryonic development, causing them to have a higher chance of becoming familial, while distal deletions occur later and have a higher chance of causing only isolated cases. Finally, our findings have important consequences for the calculation of recurrence-risk estimates according to the site of the deletion: a "proximal" new mutant has an increased recurrence risk of approximately 30%, and a "distal" new mutant has a decreased recurrence risk of approximately 4%.

A deletion including the brain promoter of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene is not associated with mental retardation.

A total of 161 unrelated Duchenne (DMD) and Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD) patients were screened for deletions in the brain promoter region of the dystrophin gene. Southern blot analysis using a probe for the brain promoter detected a deletion in this region in only one of the DMD families, in a patient with normal intelligence. This deletion also included the promoter of the muscle-type dystrophin and the exons encoding the actin-binding and part of the spectrin-like domains. Our data suggest that deletions in the brain promoter region are rare in DMD and are compatible with normal intelligence.