Intraoperative monitoring of trigeminal neuralgia: a technical note.

Trigeminal neuralgia causes excruciating pain in patients. Microvascular decompression is indicated for drug-resistant s trigeminal neuralgia. Unlike facial spasms, any part of the nerve can be the culprit, not only the root entry zone. Intraoperative monitoring does not yet exist for trigeminal neuralgia. We successfully used intermittent stimulation of the superior cerebellar artery during surgery and confirmed the disappearance of the trigeminal nerve motor branch reaction after the release of the compression. Intermittent direct stimulation of the culprit blood vessel using the motor branch of the trigeminal nerve may assist in intraoperative monitoring of decompression during trigeminal nerve vascular decompression surgery.

Unilateral abnormality of initial motor-evoked potential in the upper limb detected during lumbar spine surgery: a case report.

BACKGROUND: We present a case with abnormal findings of initial motor-evoked potential (MEP) in the left upper limb after prone positioning during lumbar spine surgery. CASE PRESENTATION: A 71-year-old man with bilateral lower extremity numbness without a history of preexisting motor weakness underwent L3-5 spinal fenestration. Initial MEP monitoring after prone positioning revealed markedly prolonged latency and lower amplitude in the left abductor pollicis brevis (APB). Because the left upper limb somatosensory-evoked potentials had normal values, a position-related impending peripheral nerve injury located between the neck and the forearm was excluded. Postoperative examination revealed that MEP abnormality in the left APB was caused by carpal tunnel syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal initial MEP from the upper limb was unexpectedly detected after prone positioning during lumbar spine surgery. The condition was caused by preexisting carpal tunnel syndrome.

Which patients do we need to consider augmentation of muscle active potentials regarding transcranial electrical stimulation motor-evoked potentials monitoring before spine surgery?

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Transcranial electrical stimulation motor-evoked potentials (Tc-MEPs) are the current trend and are important in preventing intraoperative neurological deficits. Post-tetanic Tc-MEPs (p-MEP) can augment the amplitudes of compound muscle active potentials (CMAPs), especially in the case of insufficient conventional Tc-MEPs (c-MEP). PURPOSE: To retrospectively investigate pre- and intraoperative factors necessitating p-MEP monitoring and to examine changes in the success rates of baseline Tc-MEP monitoring before and after tetanic stimulation in patients with such factors. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients (n=184) who underwent spinal surgery with Tc-MEP monitoring in our department between August 2020 and July 2022. OUTCOME MEASURES: Manual muscle testing (MMT) scores were calculated to identify patients with preoperative motor deficits. c-MEP and p-MEP amplitudes were recorded from the defined muscles. METHODS: We compared preoperative and intraoperative factors between the c-MEP and p-MEP groups (study 1). In cases where the factors were identified, we investigated the success rate of the baseline MEP measurement of each muscle before and after tetanic stimulation (study 2). RESULTS: One hundred fifty-seven patients were included. Of those, 87 showed sufficient CMAPs with c-MEP. Meanwhile, 70 needed p-MEP because of insufficient CMAPs. In univariate analysis, cervical/thoracic surgery (p<.001), preoperative MMT 3 or below (p=.009), shorter duration of illness (p=.037), previous cerebrovascular disease (p=.014), and dialysis (p=.031) were significantly associated with p-MEP group. Preoperative MMT 3 or below was the only factor requiring p-MEP (odds ratio, 3.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-8.73, p=.014) in multivariate analysis. In the p-MEP group, 24 patients had preoperative motor deficits; 16 patients with complete data were included in the analysis (study 2). The success rates of MEP monitoring before and after tetanic stimulation of the entire lower-extremity muscles were 42.7 and 57.3%, respectively (p<.001). The success rates for each muscle before and after tetanic stimulation were abductor pollicis brevis: 81.3% and 96.9%, tibialis anterior: 34.4% and 50.0%, gastrocnemius: 25% and 40.6%, and abductor hallucis: 68.8% and 81.3%, respectively. No significant differences were observed in success rates for any of the muscles. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with preoperative MMT 3 or below highly needed p-MEP. The success rate of baseline MEP monitoring increased with tetanic stimulation, even in patients with preoperative motor deficits. We believe that p-MEP monitoring can result in reliable CMAP recording, especially in cases of preoperative motor deficits with MMT scores of 3 or below.

Intraoperative motor-evoked potential with tetanic stimulation changes pre- and post-hemispherotomy.

BACKGROUND: Careful examination of motor-evoked potential (MEP) findings is critical to the safety of intraoperative neuromonitoring during neurosurgery. We reviewed the intraoperative MEP findings in a pediatric patient who had undergone hemispherotomy for refractory epilepsy. CASE DESCRIPTION: The patient was a 4-year-and-2-month-old boy with extensive right cerebral hemisphere, drug-resistant epilepsy, left upper and lower extremity paralysis, and cognitive impairment. We examined intraoperative MEP results both before and after hemispherotomy. Post-hemispherotomy and MEPs were successfully elicited through transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) but not via direct cortical stimulation on the right side. Furthermore, TES on the right side, following hemispherotomy, led to a reduction in the MEP amplification effect resulting from tetanic stimulation of the left unilateral median and tibial nerves. Conversely, we observed the effects of MEP amplification during TES on the left side after tetanic stimulation of these nerves. Postoperatively, the patient underwent magnetic resonance imaging and electroencephalogram examinations, confirming the anatomical and electrophysiological completeness of the dissection. Notably, the seizures disappeared, and no apparent complications were observed. CONCLUSION: Collectively, our findings suggest that TES can still activate deep structures and elicit MEPs, even in cases where the corticospinal connections to the posterior limb of the internal capsule are entirely severed. Thalamo-cortical interactions may affect the MEP amplification, observed during tetanic stimulation. Injury to the corticospinal tracts of the white matter may be obscured on conventional MEP findings; however, it may be identified by MEP changes in tetanic stimulation.

Utility of desflurane as an anesthetic in motor-evoked potentials in spine surgery and the facilitating effect in tetanic stimulation of bilateral median nerves.

Although desflurane is a safe and controllable inhalation anesthetic used in spinal surgery, to our knowledge, there have been no reports of successful motor-evoked potential (MEP) recordings under general anesthesia with desflurane alone. A high desflurane concentration may reduce the risk of intraoperative awareness but can also reduce the success of MEP recording. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the reliability of MEP monitoring and investigate whether tetanic stimulation can augment MEP amplitude under general anesthesia with high-concentration desflurane during spinal surgery. We prospectively evaluated 46 patients who were scheduled to undergo lumbar surgery at a single center between 2018 and 2020. Anesthesia was maintained with an end-tidal concentration of 4% desflurane and remifentanil. Compound muscle action potentials were recorded bilaterally from the abductor pollicis brevis, abductor hallucis, tibialis anterior, gastrocnemius, and quadriceps. For post-tetanic MEPs (p-MEPs), tetanic stimulation was applied to the median nerves (p-MEPm) and tibial nerves (p-MEPt) separately before transcranial stimulation. The average success rates for conventional MEP (c-MEP), p-MEPm, and p-MEPt were 77.9%, 80%, and 79.3%, respectively. The p-MEPm amplitudes were significantly higher than the c-MEP amplitudes in all muscles (P < 0.05), whereas the p-MEPt amplitudes were not significantly different from the c-MEP amplitudes. The MEP recording success rates for the gastrocnemius and quadriceps were inadequate. However, bilateral median nerve tetanic stimulation can effectively augment MEPs safely under general anesthesia with high-concentration desflurane in patients who undergo spinal surgery.

Bradykinesia and rigidity modulated by functional connectivity between the primary motor cortex and globus pallidus in Parkinson's disease.

The mechanisms underlying motor fluctuations in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) are currently unclear. Regional brain stimulation reported the changing of motor symptoms, but the correlation with functional connectivity (FC) in the brain network is not fully understood. Hence, our study aimed to explore the relationship between motor symptom severity and FC using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI) in the "on" and "off" states of PD. In 26 patients with sporadic PD, FC was assessed using rsfMRI, and clinical severity was analyzed using the motor part of the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS Part III) in the on and off states. Correlations between FC values and MDS-UPDRS Part III scores were assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficient. The correlation between FC and motor symptoms differed in the on and off states. FC between the ipsilateral precentral gyrus (PreCG) and globus pallidus (GP) correlated with the total MDS-UPDRS Part III scores and those for bradykinesia/rigidity in the off state. Lateralization analysis indicated that FC between the PreCG and GP correlated with the contralateral total MDS-UPDRS Part III scores and those for bradykinesia/rigidity in the off state. Aberrant FC in cortico-striatal circuits correlated with the severity of motor symptoms in PD. Cortico-striatal hyperconnectivity, particularly in motor pathways involving PreCG and GP, is related to motor impairments in PD. These findings may facilitate our understanding of the mechanisms underlying motor symptoms in PD and aid in developing treatment strategies such as brain stimulation for motor impairment.

Impact of Preoperative Motor Status for the Positive Predictive Value of Transcranial Motor-Evoked Potentials Alerts in Thoracic Spine Surgery: A Prospective Multicenter Study by the Monitoring Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective multicenter study. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the validity of transcranial motor-evoked potentials (Tc-MEP) in thoracic spine surgery and evaluate the impact of specific factors associated with positive predictive value (PPV). METHODS: One thousand hundred and fifty-six cases of thoracic spine surgeries were examined by comparing patient backgrounds, disease type, preoperative motor status, and Tc-MEP alert timing. Tc-MEP alerts were defined as an amplitude decrease of more than 70% from the baseline waveform. Factors were compared according to preoperative motor status and the result of Tc-MEP alerts. Factors that showed significant differences were identified by univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Overall sensitivity was 91.9% and specificity was 88.4%. The PPV was significantly higher in the preoperative motor deficits group than in the preoperative no-motor deficits group for both high-risk (60.3% vs 38.3%) and non-high-risk surgery groups (35.1% vs 12.8%). In multivariate logistic analysis, the significant factors associated with true positive were surgical maneuvers related to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (odds ratio = 11.88; 95% CI: 3.17-44.55), resection of intradural intramedullary spinal cord tumor (odds ratio = 8.83; 95% CI: 2.89-27), preoperative motor deficit (odds ratio = 3.46; 95% CI: 1.64-7.3) and resection of intradural extramedullary spinal cord tumor (odds ratio = 3.0; 95% CI: 1.16-7.8). The significant factor associated with false positive was non-attributable alerts (odds ratio = .28; 95% CI: .09-.85). CONCLUSION: Surgeons are strongly encouraged to use Tc-MEP in patients with preoperative motor deficits, regardless of whether they are undergoing high-risk spine surgery or not. Knowledge of PPV characteristics will greatly assist in effective Tc-MEP enforcement and minimize neurological complications with appropriate interventions.

Challenges in evaluating forearm muscle activity based on the compound muscle action potential of the flexors of the whole forearm.

Objective: Muscle strength, which correlates with the compound muscle action potential (CMAP), can also be estimated by measuring the CMAP. Therefore, we evaluated the CMAP of the flexor muscles of the whole forearm to identify their muscle strength. Methods: Fourteen healthy volunteers were enrolled. The elbow was determined to be the stimulation point, and the recording site for the flexor muscles of the whole forearm was set at approximately 8 cm distal to the elbow. We prospectively evaluated the baseline-to-peak amplitude of the CMAP of the whole forearm flexor muscles (WFFM), including that obtained from the median nerve stimulation (WFFMm), ulnar nerve stimulation (WFFMu), and their sum (WFFMsum). Additionally, we analyzed the relationships between WFFMm and WFFMu amplitudes with other quantitative parameters, including grip strength and routine CMAP amplitudes. Results: The CMAP's test-retest analysis revealed high reliability. Grip power was significantly correlated with WFFMm and WFFMsum and mildly correlated with WFFMu. Tip-pinch strength with WFFMm and flexor pollicis longus (FPL) measurements correlated significantly. Lateral-pinch strength was significantly correlated with the first dorsal interosseous muscle (FDI) measurements but not with WFFM. The abductor digiti minimi (ADM) and abductor pollicis brevis (APB) were not correlated with grip power or pinch strength. Conclusions: By electrophysiology examination, this study demonstrated that WFFMm is involved in grip power and other pinch strengths. This method may serve as a novel tool for measurement of distal muscle strengths. Significance: This is the first study to attempt to evaluate the muscle strength of forearm flexor muscles by measuring the CMAP.

Effect of cerebrospinal fluid drainage pressure in descending and thoracoabdominal aortic repair: a prospective multicenter observational study.

PURPOSE: Cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD) is recommended during open or endovascular thoracic aortic repair. However, the incidence of CSFD complications is still high. Recently, CSF pressure has been kept high to avoid complications, but the efficacy of CSFD at higher pressures has not been confirmed. We hypothesize that CSFD at higher pressures is effective for preventing motor deficits. METHODS: This prospective observational study included 14 hospitals that are members of the Japanese Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. Patients who underwent thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic repair were divided into four groups: Group 1, CSF pressure around 10 mmHg; Group 2, CSF pressure around 15 mmHg; Group 3, CSFD initiated when motor evoked potential amplitudes decreased; and Group 4, no CSFD. We assessed the association between the CSFD group and motor deficits using mixed-effects logistic regression with a random intercept for the institution. RESULTS: Of 1072 patients in the study, 84 patients (open surgery, 51; thoracic endovascular aortic repair, 33) had motor deficits at discharge. Groups 1 and 2 were not associated with motor deficits (Group 1, odds ratio (OR): 1.53, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.71-3.29, p = 0.276; Group 2, OR: 1.73, 95% CI: 0.62-4.82) when compared with Group 4. Group 3 was significantly more prone to motor deficits than Group 4 (OR: 2.56, 95% CI: 1.27-5.17, p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: CSFD is not associated with motor deficits in thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic repair with CSF pressure around 10 or 15 mmHg.

Motor-evoked potential monitoring from urinary sphincter muscle during pediatric untethering surgery: a case series.

PURPOSE: Postoperative urinary dysfunction following untethering surgery for spinal lipoma is devastating. To assess urinary function, we invented a pediatric urinary catheter equipped with electrodes for the direct transurethral recording of myogenic potential from the external urethral sphincter (EUS). This paper presents two cases in which urinary function was monitored intraoperatively by recording of motor-evoked potential (MEP) from EUS during untethering surgery in children. METHODS: Two children (aged 2 and 6 years) were included in this study. One patient had no preoperative neurological dysfunction, while the other had frequent urination and urinary incontinence. A pair of surface electrodes was attached to a silicone rubber urethral catheter (6 or 8 Fr; diameter, 2 or 2.6 mm). The MEP from the EUS was recorded to assess the function of the centrifugal tract from the motor cortex to the pudendal nerve. RESULTS: Baseline MEP waveforms from the EUS were successfully recorded with latency and amplitude of 39.5 ms and 66 µV in patient 1 and 39.0 ms and 113 µV in patient 2, respectively. A significant decrease in amplitude was not observed during surgery in the two cases. No new urinary dysfunction and complications associated with the urinary catheter-equipped electrodes developed postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Using an electrode-equipped urinary catheter, monitoring of MEP from the EUS could be applicable during untethering surgery in pediatric patients.

Role of Transcranial Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring During Traumatic Spinal Injury Surgery: A Prospective Multicenter Study of the Monitoring Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective multicenter observational cohort study. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the role of transcranial motor evoked potential (TcMEP) monitoring during traumatic spinal injury surgery, the timing of TcMEP alerts, and intervention strategies to avoid intraoperative neurological complications. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Intraoperative neuromonitoring, including TcMEP monitoring, is commonly used in high-risk spinal surgery to predict intraoperative spinal cord injury; however, little information is available on its use in traumatic spinal injury surgery. METHODS: The TcMEP monitoring data of 350 consecutive patients who underwent traumatic spinal injury surgery (mean age, 69.3 y) between 2017 and 2021 were prospectively reviewed. In this study, a TcMEP amplitude reduction ≥70% was established as a TcMEP alert. A rescue case was defined as a case with the recovery of TcMEP amplitudes after certain procedures and without postoperative neurological complications. RESULTS: Among the 350 patients who underwent traumatic spinal injury surgery (TcMEP derivation rate 94%), TcMEP monitoring revealed seven true-positive (TP) (2.0%), three rescues (0.9%; rescue rate 30%), 31 false-positive, one false-negative, and 287 true-negative cases, resulting in 88% sensitivity, 90% specificity, 18% positive predictive value, and 99% negative predictive value. The TP rate in patients with preoperative motor deficits was 2.9%, which was higher than that in patients without preoperative motor deficits (1.1%). The most common timing of TcMEP alerts was during decompression (40%). During decompression, suspension of surgery with intravenous steroid injection was ineffective (rescue rate, 0%), and additional decompression was effective. CONCLUSION: Given the low prevalence of neurological complications (2.3%) and the low positive predictive value (18.4%), single usage of TcMEP monitoring during traumatic spinal injury surgery is not recommended. Further efforts should be made to reduce FP alert rates through better interpretation of multimodal Intraoperative neuromonitorings and the incorporation of anesthesiology to improve the positive predictive value. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Effects of intraoperative motor evoked potential amplification following tetanic stimulation of the pudendal nerve in pediatric craniotomy.

OBJECTIVE: Monitoring the intraoperative motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in pediatric craniotomy is challenging because of its low detection rate, which makes it unreliable. Tetanic stimulation of the peripheral nerves of the extremities and pudendal nerves prior to transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) or direct cortical stimulation (DCS) amplifies the MEPs. The authors investigated the effects of MEP amplification following tetanic stimulation of the median and tibial nerve or the pudendal nerve in pediatric patients undergoing craniotomy. METHODS: This prospective observational study included 15 patients ≤ 15 years of age (mean age 8.9 ± 4.9 years) undergoing craniotomy. MEPs were obtained with TES (15 cases) or DCS (8 cases)-conventional MEP without tetanic stimulation (c-MEP) and MEP following tetanic stimulation of the unilateral median and tibial nerves (mt-MEP) or following tetanic stimulation of the pudendal nerve (p-MEP) were used. Compound muscle action potentials were elicited from the abductor pollicis brevis, gastrocnemius, tibialis anterior, and abductor hallucis longus muscles. The authors compared the identification rate and the rate of amplitude increase of each MEP. RESULTS: For both TES and DCS, the identification and amplitude increase rates were significantly higher in cases without preoperative hemiparesis for p-MEPs than in those for c-MEPs and mt-MEPs. In comparison to patients with preoperative hemiparesis, p-MEPs displayed a higher identification rate, with fewer false negatives in DCS cases. CONCLUSIONS: In pediatric craniotomy, the authors observed the amplification effect of MEPs with pudendal nerve tetanic stimulation and the amplification effect of DCS on MEPs without increasing false negatives. These findings suggested the likelihood of more reliable intraoperative MEP monitoring in pediatric cases.

Motor-evoked potentials monitoring with remimazolam during thoracic descending aortic aneurysm surgery: a case report.

Paraplegia remains the most devastating complication following thoracoabdominal aortic surgery. Motor-evoked potential (MEP) monitoring has been widely used to assess intraoperative motor function. MEP amplitude is affected by various factors, including anesthetic agents and measurement time; however, there are no reports regarding MEP monitoring using remimazolam in thoracoabdominal aortic surgery. A 57-year-old woman underwent open repair of a thoracic descending aorta for a chronic dissecting aortic aneurysm under remimazolam and remifentanil anesthesia. The administration rate of remimazolam was adjusted using spectral edge frequency of SedLine®, which ranged from 0.2 to 1.0 mg/kg/h after anesthetic induction with 12 mg/kg/h. Muscle MEPs were obtained using subdermal needle electrodes at the abductor pollicis brevis muscle and abductor hallucis. There were no significant changes, which were defined as a 50% reduction of MEP amplitude from each baseline value, including during split circulation. On postoperative day one, she had no motor deficits nor signs of intraoperative awareness. Remimazolam might be well tolerated for MEP monitoring in patients undergoing thoracic descending aortic aneurysm surgery.

Resection of brachial plexus schwannomas while monitoring transcranial motor evoked potentials: report of two cases.

A schwannoma is a benign nerve sheath tumor treated by enucleation, which carries the risk of intraoperative nerve injury that is observed after awakening. Transcranial motor evoked potential (TcMEP) monitoring has been established as an effective method to predict and prevent intraoperative neurological complications during brain and spinal surgery. However, there have been few reports on its application in head and neck surgeries. We performed enucleation to relieve the symptoms due to schwannomas in the neck of two women, aged 25 years and 70 years. Both women presented with a left cervical mass, paresthesia of the left upper limb, and a Tinel-like sign without muscle weakness. TcMEPs were recorded before beginning surgery, during surgery, and immediately before completing surgery. The dissecting lines were decided using the stimulator attached to the dissecting instrument, which helped warn the surgeon regarding risky areas. Histopathological examinations confirmed the diagnosis of schwannoma. There was no significant difference in the pre- and postoperative TcMEP recordings, and no postoperative motor deficits were identified. Intraoperative TcMEP monitoring is expected to be useful in preventing operative complications while treating head and neck schwannomas.

Efficacy of Transcranial Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring During Intra- and Extramedullary Spinal Cord Tumor Surgery: A Prospective Multicenter Study of the Monitoring Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research.

STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter prospective study. OBJECTIVES: Although intramedullary spinal cord tumor (IMSCT) and extramedullary SCT (EMSCT) surgeries carry high risk of intraoperative motor deficits (MDs), the benefits of transcranial motor evoked potential (TcMEP) monitoring are well-accepted; however, comparisons have not yet been conducted. This study aimed to clarify the efficacy of TcMEP monitoring during IMSCT and EMSCT resection surgeries. METHODS: We prospectively reviewed TcMEP monitoring data of 81 consecutive IMSCT and 347 EMSCT patients. We compared the efficacy of interventions based on TcMEP alerts in the IMSCT and EMSCT groups. We defined our alert point as a TcMEP amplitude reduction of ≥70% from baseline. RESULTS: In the IMSCT group, TcMEP monitoring revealed 20 true-positive (25%), 8 rescue (10%; rescue rate 29%), 10 false-positive, a false-negative, and 41 true-negative patients, resulting in a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 80%. In the EMSCT group, TcMEP monitoring revealed 20 true-positive (6%), 24 rescue (7%; rescue rate 55%), 29 false-positive, 2 false-negative, and 263 true-negative patients, resulting in a sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 90%. The most common TcMEP alert timing was during tumor resection (96% vs. 91%), and suspension surgeries with or without intravenous steroid administration were performed as intervention techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative MD rates in IMSCT and EMSCT surgeries using TcMEP monitoring were 25% and 6%, and rescue rates were 29% and 55%. We believe that the usage of TcMEP monitoring and appropriate intervention techniques during SCT surgeries might have predicted and prevented the occurrence of intraoperative MDs.

Efficacy of D-Wave Monitoring Combined With the Transcranial Motor-Evoked Potentials in High-Risk Spinal Surgery: A Retrospective Multicenter Study of the Monitoring Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective multicenter cohort study. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to clarify the efficacy of multimodal intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM), especially in transcranial electrical stimulation of motor-evoked potentials (TES-MEPs) with spinal cord-evoked potentials after transcranial stimulation of the brain (D-wave) in the detection of reversible spinal cord injury in high-risk spinal surgery. METHODS: We reviewed 1310 patients who underwent TES-MEPs during spinal surgery at 14 spine centers. We compared the monitoring results of TES-MEPs with D-wave vs TES-MEPs without D-wave in high-risk spinal surgery. RESULTS: There were 40 cases that used TES-MEPs with D-wave and 1270 cases that used TES-MEPs without D-wave. Before patients were matched, there were significant differences between groups in terms of sex and spinal disease category. Although there was no significant difference in the rescue rate between TES-MEPs with D-wave (2.0%) and TES-MEPs (2.5%), the false-positivity rate was significantly lower (0%) in the TES-MEPs-with-D-wave group. Using a one-to-one propensity score-matched analysis, 40 pairs of patients from the two groups were selected. Baseline characteristics did not significantly differ between the matched groups. In the score-matched analysis, one case (2.5%) in both groups was a case of rescue (P = 1), five (12.5%) cases in the TES-MEPs group were false positives, and there were no false positives in the TES-MEPs-with-D-wave group (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: TES-MEPs with D-wave in high-risk spine surgeries did not affect rescue case rates. However, it helped reduce the false-positivity rate.

Intraoperative Transcranial Motor-Evoked Potential Monitoring During Head and Neck Surgeries: A Case of Cervical Vagus Nerve Schwannoma With Laryngeal Paralysis.

Intraoperative transcranial motor-evoked potential (TcMEP) monitoring can effectively prevent neurological complications by enabling the evaluation of neurological deficits in all pathways from the motor cortex to the periphery. However, studies regarding its applicability in head and neck surgery are insufficient. This case report discusses a patient who was intraoperatively diagnosed with a right cervical vagus nerve schwannoma previously at another hospital. The patient then developed right laryngeal paralysis after the surgery without neuromonitoring. No significant recovery of the paralysis was observed, and after eight months of being referred to our institution, the patient opted for surgical retreatment following tumor growth and accompanying symptoms such as cervical swelling and discomfort. The patient was examined to evaluate the nerve damage in his previous surgery TcMEP monitoring as well as direct stimulation (DS). The right vagus nerve (RVN) showed no response on TcMEP monitoring throughout the surgery despite a significant response to DS at the tumor site. These findings suggest that the RVN had been damaged medial to the tumor site, and the damage occurred because of traction and ischemia during the previous surgery. Thus, contrary to our belief, medial nerve damage may be present even when local and peripheral nerve preservation is observed through peripheral neuromonitoring. This suggests that DS alone during neuromonitoring in head and neck surgery is insufficient. A multimodal evaluation approach, including TcMEP monitoring, is effective in not only preventing neurological complications but also in evaluating neurological deficits in all pathways from the motor cortex to the periphery.

Retrospective observational study of the effects of residual neuromuscular blockade and sugammadex on motor-evoked potential monitoring during spine surgery in Japan.

Given neuromuscular blockade (NMB) can affect the amplitude and detection success rate of motor-evoked potentials (MEP), sugammadex may be administered intraoperatively. We evaluated the factors affecting the degree of residual NMB (i.e., the train-of-four [TOF] ratio) and the relationship between TOF ratio and MEP detection success rate in Japanese patients undergoing spine surgery. This single-center retrospective observational study included adults who underwent spine surgery under propofol/remifentanil anesthesia, received rocuronium for intubation, and underwent myogenic MEP monitoring after transcranial stimulation. TOF ratios were assessed using electromyography. Sugammadex was administered after finishing the MEP setting and the TOF ratio was ≤0.7. To identify factors affecting the TOF ratio, TOF ratio and MEP detection success rate were simultaneously measured after finishing the MEP setting; to compare the time from intubation to the start of MEP monitoring after NMB recovery between sugammadex and spontaneous recovery groups, multivariable analyses were performed. Of 373 cases analyzed, sugammadex was administered to 221 (59.2%) cases. Age, blood pressure, hepatic impairment, and rocuronium dose were the main factors affecting the TOF ratio. Patients with higher TOF ratios (≥0.75) had higher MEP detection success rates. The time from intubation to the start of MEP monitoring after NMB recovery was significantly shorter in patients administered sugammadex versus patients without sugammadex (P < .0001). The MEP detection success rate was higher in patients with a TOF ratio of ≥0.75. Sugammadex shortened the time from intubation to the start of MEP monitoring after NMB recovery.