Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
In Vivo ; 32(3): 643-648, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29695572

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: Extended total mesorectal excision (ETME) is defined as en bloc resection of the adjacent organs outside the mesorectal fascia, that is indicated in cases with locally advanced lower rectal cancer (T4 tumor). The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic ETME (L-ETME) for locally advanced lower rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The present study analyzed clinical outcomes and oncological outcomes of 11 consecutive patients who underwent L-ETME for cT4 lower rectal cancer in Nagasaki Medical Center between 2012 and 2015. RESULTS: Of the 11 patients, 7 underwent neoadjuvant therapy, and 7 underwent pelvic node dissection. One case (7.1%) underwent resection of anterior organs (prostate), 6 cases (54.5%) had resection of the lateral organs (neurovascular bundle, hypogastric nerve, pelvic plexus, ovary, and internal iliac blood vessels) and 4 cases (36.4%) had resection of both anterior and lateral organs. In all cases enrolled in this study, R0 resection was achieved. The median operation time and intraoperative blood loss were 416 min and 350 ml, respectively. The postoperative complication rate was 18.2% (2/11). The 3-year overall survival rate was 79.5%, and the 3-year local recurrence-free survival rate was 87.5%. There was no mortality and no re-operation in this series. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study suggest that L-ETME is feasible and has efficacy for locally advanced lower rectal cancer.


Subject(s)
Colectomy , Laparoscopy , Rectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Colectomy/methods , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Humans , Laparoscopy/methods , Lymph Node Excision , Male , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoplasm Staging , Rectal Neoplasms/mortality , Rectal Neoplasms/therapy , Reproducibility of Results , Treatment Outcome
2.
Anticancer Res ; 37(9): 5095-5100, 2017 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28870939

ABSTRACT

AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for total mesorectal excision (TME) with lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLD) in advanced lower rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-four patients who underwent TME with LPLD for lower rectal cancer (pStage II/III) between January 2008 and December 2014 were divided into two groups according to the type of surgical approach as follows: open LPLD group (OLD, n=17) and laparoscopic LPLD group (LLD, n=27). RESULTS: Operative time was comparable between the groups (p=0.15), whereas intraoperative blood loss and complication rates were significantly less in LLD than in OLD. Postoperative hospital stay was shorter in LLD than in OLD. Overall survival and local recurrence-free survival were similar in the two groups. Disease-free survival was better in LLD than in OLD, although the difference was not significant. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic TME with LPLD is safe and feasible.


Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Lymph Node Excision , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Pelvis , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...