Efficacy and Safety of Add-on Mirogabalin to NSAIDs in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: A Randomized, Open-Label Study.

INTRODUCTION: In Japan, conservative therapy for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) includes non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), prostaglandin E1, tramadol, physical/exercise therapy, and nerve blocks. Mirogabalin, a selective oral α2δ ligand, is approved for treating peripheral neuropathic pain, though data regarding visual analog scores (VAS) for pain in patients with LSS are limited. We investigated the efficacy and safety of mirogabalin as an add-on treatment in patients with LSS taking NSAIDs compared with patients taking NSAIDs only. METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, open-label study (MiroTAS) was conducted at 32 centers in Japan between June 2020 and October 2021. Patients were randomly assigned to mirogabalin and NSAIDs or NSAIDs alone in a 1:1 ratio. NSAIDs were administered according to their Japanese package inserts; mirogabalin was administered based on renal function [creatinine clearance (CrCL) ≥ 60 mL/min, 5 mg twice daily (BID) in Weeks 1-2, 10 mg BID in Weeks 3-4, and 15 or 10 mg BID after Week 5; CrCL 30 to < 60 mL/min, 2.5 mg BID Weeks 1-2, 5 mg BID Weeks 3-4, and 7.5 or 5 mg BID after Week 5]. The primary endpoint was the change in VAS score for leg pain from baseline to Week 12. Secondary endpoints were quality of life, evaluated using the EuroQol five-dimensional descriptive system (EQ-5D-5L) (at baseline and Week 12) and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) (at Week 12), and safety. Change in VAS score at Week 12 was calculated using a linear mixed model for repeated measures. The safety endpoints were treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and adverse drug reactions. RESULTS: In total, 220 patients who met the eligibility criteria were enrolled. In the mirogabalin and NSAIDs and NSAIDs groups, mean ages (67.8 vs. 70.9 years), proportions of female patients (54.5% vs. 49.0%), mean body weights (63.9 vs. 62.0 kg), mean CrCL values (81.5 vs. 70.7 mL/min), proportions of patients with CrCL 30 to < 60 mL/min (27.3% vs. 33.7%), mean VAS scores (63.8 vs. 62.8 mm), and proportions of patients with VAS score ≥ 60 (53.6% vs. 52.9%) at enrollment were similar. The median durations of LSS were 9.0 and 11.0 months and the spine pain DETECT questionnaire (SPDQ) scores were 6.8 and 7.8, respectively. The least square (LS) mean change in VAS score from baseline to Week 12 was - 24.1 mm in the mirogabalin and NSAIDs group and - 14.2 mm in the NSAIDs group (both P < 0.0001 vs. baseline). The difference in LS mean was - 9.9 [95% confidence interval (CI), - 18.0, - 1.8] (P = 0.0174). The improvement in EQ-5D-5L score at Week 12 was significantly greater in the mirogabalin and NSAIDs group versus the NSAIDs group [mean difference, 0.0529 (95% CI, 0.0036, 0.1022), P = 0.0357]. At Week 12, the proportions of patients with PGIC scores ≤ 3 and ≤ 2 were higher in the mirogabalin and NSAIDs group vs. the NSAIDs group (76.2% vs. 50.0%, P = 0.0006, and 47.6% vs. 32.4%, P = 0.0523). In the mirogabalin and NSAIDs group, the incidences of TEAEs and adverse drug reactions were 60.9% and 57.3%, respectively, and the most common TEAEs were somnolence (30.0%) and dizziness (25.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of mirogabalin to NSAIDs improved VAS, EQ-5D-5L, and PGIC. The main TEAEs were somnolence and dizziness. The addition of mirogabalin to NSAIDs improved peripheral neuropathic pain associated with LSS and raised no new safety concerns. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs021200007).

Mirogabalin treatment of postoperative neuropathic pain after thoracic surgery: study protocol for a multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, interventional trial.

BACKGROUND: Intercostal nerve damage due to thoracotomy or thoracoscopic manipulation is a major contributor to chronic postsurgical pain after pulmonary resection. Chronic postsurgical pain may last for months or years and can negatively impair physical functioning and daily activities. Global consensus on severe postoperative pain management is lacking, and chronic pain incidence after thoracic surgery remains high. Many patients report neuropathic pain, which can be difficult to treat with currently available therapies. The efficacy and safety of mirogabalin have been demonstrated for other types of neuropathic pain; thus, this study was planned to investigate the efficacy and safety of mirogabalin to treat neuropathic pain after thoracic surgery. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, interventional study, patients who are diagnosed with neuropathic pain following removal of a chest drain after lung resection will receive conventional therapy (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and/or acetaminophen) with or without the addition of a clinical dose of mirogabalin for 8 weeks. For patient stratification, a visual analog scale pain intensity score at baseline of <60 vs. ≥60 mm will be used. Treatment efficacy and safety with and without the addition of mirogabalin will be assessed using a questionnaire evaluating postoperative changes in pain severity and activity. The primary study endpoint is the change in pain intensity from baseline to Week 8, measured by the visual analog scale. Additionally, the presence of chronic pain at 12 weeks after enrollment in each treatment group will be recorded. DISCUSSION: This protocol has been reviewed and approved by the Clinical Research Review Board of Nagasaki University. Study data will be published in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials database and peer-reviewed journals. Mirogabalin is already approved for the treatment of other types of neuropathic pain. It is anticipated that this study will provide data to elucidate the impact of mirogabalin treatment, in combination with conventional therapy, to benefit patients with neuropathic pain following thoracic surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials Identifier: jRCTs071200053.

A Cross-Sectional Web Survey of Satisfaction with Treatment for Pain in Participants with Suspected Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain in Both Feet.

INTRODUCTION: Diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP), a symptom of diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN), is underdiagnosed in people with diabetes. To date, no studies have determined the relationship between diagnosis of DPN and satisfaction with treatment for pain. Additionally, the factors that influence satisfaction with treatment for pain remain unknown. This questionnaire study was conducted to understand satisfaction with treatment for pain among participants with diabetes who experienced bilateral pain or numbness in their feet. METHODS: This cross-sectional, observational, web-based questionnaire study for participants with diabetes and suspected DPNP was conducted in Japan. Potential respondents were registered in the INTAGE Disease Panel or the Rakuten Insight Disease Panel. The primary endpoint was the number and percentage of participants who were satisfied with their DPNP treatment. Secondary endpoints included participant opinions regarding treatment-related efficacy, side effects, and economic burden, and factors affecting satisfaction with treatment. RESULTS: The questionnaire was accessed by 7565 potential participants; 777 met the eligibility criteria (final analysis set). Satisfaction with treatment for bilateral foot pain was low (satisfied, 27.9%; neither satisfied nor unsatisfied, 42.2%; unsatisfied, 23.4%; very unsatisfied, 6.4%). Participants were somewhat more satisfied with treatment side effects than with treatment efficacy and economic burden. Satisfaction with treatment mainly differed by improvement in actions in daily life, improvement in quality of life, and communication with doctors. The diagnostic testing rate for DPN was low, and diagnosis was more common in participants who complained of symptoms of pain and numbness (any visit) versus those who did not. CONCLUSION: Participants with diabetes who experience bilateral foot pain or numbness reported a low level of satisfaction with treatment for pain.

People with diabetes may develop diabetic polyneuropathy and experience diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain, which is often felt as pain or numbness below the knee. This study aimed to learn whether participants with diabetes who had pain or numbness in both feet were satisfied with the pain treatment they received. Factors affecting satisfaction with treatment were also evaluated. Potential participants with diabetes identified from two commercial databases (INTAGE Disease Panel or Rakuten Insight Disease Panel) of patients with various diseases living in Japan were asked to respond to our web survey. Besides satisfaction with treatment for pain, participants were asked about how well their treatment was working, treatment side effects, how treatment affected them financially, and what factors affected their satisfaction with treatment. The main finding was that only 27.9% of participants were satisfied with their treatment for foot pain and numbness. Generally, participants were more satisfied with treatment side effects than they were with how well the treatment worked, and how treatment affected them financially. Participants were more satisfied if they had an improved ability to perform everyday activities or experienced an improvement in quality of life with treatment. Participants were also more satisfied if they communicated well with their physician. The rate of diagnostic tests was low; however, participants were more likely to receive a diagnostic test when they complained of pain or numbness than when they did not. On the basis of these findings, we think improvements in the treatment of foot pain or numbness in those with diabetes are needed.

Switching From Pregabalin to Mirogabalin in Patients with Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: A Multi-Center, Prospective, Single-Arm, Open-Label Study (MIROP Study).

INTRODUCTION: Mirogabalin, which is a selective ligand of the α2δ subunit of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels, was recently approved in Japan for peripheral neuropathic pain. The α2δ ligands, including mirogabalin and pregabalin, are associated with significant risk of adverse events (AEs) such as somnolence or dizziness, leading to poor compliance and subsequent inefficacy. Safety and efficacy data for switching patients from pregabalin to mirogabalin are scarce. METHODS: This prospective, single-arm, open-label study involving ten participating centers in Japan recruited patients aged ≥ 20 years with peripheral neuropathic pain [visual analog scale (VAS) score ≥ 40 mm]. Where necessary, patients underwent a 1-week tapering period to reduce their pregabalin dose, after which pregabalin was stopped and mirogabalin dose was increased using a step-wise dose titration. Patients underwent dose increases after the first and second weeks if there were no tolerability issues, followed by the effective doses until the end of the study (4 weeks). The primary endpoint was the incidence of somnolence, dizziness, and peripheral edema; secondary endpoints included changes in VAS score. AEs were monitored for safety. RESULTS: Of 157 patients who provided informed consent, 152 patients were enrolled; 136 (89.5%) patients completed the study. The overall incidences of somnolence, dizziness, and peripheral edema were 41.4, 15.8, and 2.6%, respectively. Most patients (> 70%) experienced mild AEs, and one patient experienced a severe AE (dizziness). Most patients (> 70%) were able to achieve dose titration to an effective dose. Overall mean VAS score significantly decreased (Δ15.7 mm, p < 0.0001) by the end of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Mirogabalin switching from pregabalin is well tolerated and effective in pain management for peripheral neuropathic pain using a step-wise titration. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs031190113).

A Cross-sectional Survey of Patients with Suspected Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain in Japan.

Objective The burden of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP) is poorly understood. The present study reported on the current status of DPNP in Japan, to improve our understanding of this condition among healthcare providers and inform future clinical research on its prevalence, diagnosis, and management. Methods A cross-sectional, observational study (UMIN000037023) was conducted via a web-based survey. The primary endpoints were the frequency of patients with bilateral foot symptoms, consulting a doctor, understanding DPNP, and reporting problems in daily life, as well as the treatment awareness of patients. Patients Adults ≥20 years old who were registered in the Rakuten Insight Disease Panel and receiving anti-diabetic therapy in Japan were included. Results Bilateral foot pain symptoms were reported by 1,768/7,754 (22.8%) respondents, most commonly intense numbness (13.0%). Of those with symptoms, 55.3% consulted a doctor; the most common reason for not seeking consultation was feeling that symptoms were insufficiently severe to bother their doctor (89.4%). Nearly 60% reported understanding the causes of their symptoms, with diabetes-associated neurologic deficits (58.8%) most commonly identified. About one-quarter reported daily life problems, including an inability to walk for long periods (58.3%) and feeling anxious (58.1%). Treatment awareness was reported by 18.2%; oral medications were commonly recognized (64.6%). Conclusion In Japan, 22.8% of patients with diabetes have bilateral foot pain symptoms; some experience problems in their daily life without understanding the causes of their symptoms. This supports the importance of actions to increase awareness and minimize DPNP-associated impairment of daily life in patients with diabetes.

Mirogabalin in Japanese Patients with Renal Impairment and Pain Associated with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy or Post-Herpetic Neuralgia: A Phase III, Open-Label, 14-Week Study.

PURPOSE: Mirogabalin was recently approved in Japan for the treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain, based on data from clinical trials in diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP) and post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN), common clinical conditions which cause intense distress for patients. We characterized the safety and tolerability of mirogabalin in Japanese patients with renal impairment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter, open-label study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02607280) enrolled renally impaired individuals aged ≥20 years diagnosed with DPNP or PHN, and with an average daily pain score (ADPS) of ≥4 over the 7 days prior to treatment initiation. Mirogabalin dosage was titrated for 2 weeks, followed by a fixed dose for 12 weeks according to degree of renal impairment: 7.5 mg twice daily for moderate impairment and 7.5 mg once daily for severe impairment. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability of mirogabalin, evaluated via treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Secondary efficacy endpoints included change in ADPS from baseline to Week 14. RESULTS: Overall, 35 patients were enrolled (30 with moderate and 5 with severe renal impairment). Most TEAEs were mild or moderate in severity; the most commonly reported were nasopharyngitis (22.9%) and somnolence (11.4%). Only 4 patients (11.4%) discontinued treatment due to TEAEs. Mirogabalin significantly decreased ADPS from baseline in patients with renal impairment; least squares mean change from baseline at Week 14 was -1.9 (95% confidence interval: -2.8, -1.0). CONCLUSION: Mirogabalin was well tolerated and significantly reduced pain levels when used to treat DPNP/PHN at a fixed dose of 7.5 mg once or twice daily in patients with renal impairment.

Recent prescription status of oral analgesics in Japan in real-world clinical settings: retrospective study using a large-scale prescription database.

Background: Information on prescriptions of oral analgesics for the treatment of pain is beneficial. However, there have been few reports on the prescription status of oral analgesics from a nation-wide, large-scale prescription database in Japan. Research design and methods: The authors analyzed the prescription data of 2,042,302 patients prescribed oral analgesics in 2017. The numbers/proportions of patients prescribed oral analgesics, adherence with approved doses, co-prescription patterns, dose changes, drug adherence, and treatment-discontinuation rates were evaluated. Results: Loxoprofen was prescribed to 32.5% of the patients, followed by celecoxib, prescribed to 16.0% of patients. Acetaminophen and pregabalin were prescribed to 10.5% and 9.4% of patients, respectively. Many analgesics were prescribed at lower doses than the approved doses. The most frequently used concomitant medication was pregabalin. For duloxetine and pregabalin, high proportions of patients were prescribed these drugs for > 90 days. Conclusions: Loxoprofen was the most prescribed of the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in Japan. The information obtained provides an overview of prescribed oral analgesics in Japan and could be useful for potential research into prescribed oral analgesics in the future.

Inhibition of RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis by (-)-DHMEQ, a novel NF-kappaB inhibitor, through downregulation of NFATc1.

UNLABELLED: (-)-DHMEQ, a newly designed NF-kappaB inhibitor, inhibited RANKL-induced osteoclast differentiation in mouse BMMs through downregulation of the induction of NFATc1, an essential transcription factor of osteoclastogenesis. INTRODUCTION: Bone destruction is often observed in advanced case of rheumatoid arthritis and neoplastic diseases, including multiple myeloma. Effective and nontoxic chemotherapeutic agents are expected for the suppression of these bone destructions. RANKL induces activation of NF-kappaB and osteoclastogenesis in bone marrow-derived monocyte/macrophage precursor cells (BMMs). Targeted disruption or pharmacological suppression of NF-kappaB result in impaired osteoclastogenesis, but how NF-kappaB is involved in the regulation of osteoclastogenesis is not known. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The effect of (-)-dehydroxymethylepoxyquinomicin [(-)-DHMEQ] on osteoclast differentiation was studied using a culture system of mouse BMMs stimulated with RANKL and macrophage colony-stimulating factor. The mechanism of the inhibition was studied by biochemical analysis such as immunoblotting and retroviral transfer experiments. RESULTS: (-)-DHMEQ strongly inhibited RANKL-induced NF-kappaB activation in BMMs and inhibited RANKL-induced formation of TRACP(+) multinucleated cells. Interestingly, (-)-DHMEQ specifically inhibited the RANKL-induced expression of NFATc1 but not the expressions of TRAF6 or c-fos. Inhibition of osteoclast differentiation by (-)-DHMEQ was rescued by overexpression of NFATc1, suggesting that the inhibition is not caused by a toxic effect. Moreover, pit formation assays showed that (-)-DHMEQ also inhibited the bone-resorbing activity of mature osteoclasts. CONCLUSION: The inhibition of NF-kappaB suppresses osteoclastogenesis by downregulation of NFATc1, suggesting that NFATc1 expression is regulated by NF-kappaB in RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis. Our results also indicate the possibility of (-)-DHMEQ becoming a new therapeutic strategy against bone erosion.

Screening of bioactive metabolites for pancreatic regeneration chemotherapy.

Plants and microorganisms are the treasury of bioactive metabolites including useful chemical ligands. Chemical ligands that induce beta-cell differentiation may be useful as new therapeutic agents for both type-1 and type-2 diabetes mellitus. We isolated conophylline from the leaves of Ervatamia microphylla as an agent that induce insulin production in rat pancreatic acinar carcinoma cells.

Identification of TIFA as an adapter protein that links tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6) to interleukin-1 (IL-1) receptor-associated kinase-1 (IRAK-1) in IL-1 receptor signaling.

Tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6) transduces signals from members of the Toll/interleukin-1 (IL-1) receptor family by interacting with IL-1 receptor-associated kinase-1 (IRAK-1) after IRAK-1 is released from the receptor-MyD88 complex upon IL-1 stimulation. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying regulation of the IRAK-1/TRAF6 interaction are largely unknown. We have identified TIFA, a TRAF-interacting protein with a forkhead-associated (FHA) domain. The FHA domain is a motif known to bind directly to phosphothreonine and phosphoserine. In transient transfection assays, TIFA activates NFkappaBeta and c-Jun amino-terminal kinase. However, TIFA carrying a mutation that abolishes TRAF6 binding or mutations in the FHA domain that are known to abolish FHA domain binding to phosphopeptide fails to activate NFkappaBeta and c-Jun amino-terminal kinase. TIFA, when overexpressed, binds both TRAF6 and IRAK-1 and significantly enhances the IRAK-1/TRAF6 interaction. Furthermore, analysis of endogenous proteins indicates that TIFA associates with TRAF6 constitutively, whereas it associates with IRAK-1 in an IL-1 stimulation-dependent manner in vivo. Thus, TIFA is likely to mediate IRAK-1/TRAF6 interaction upon IL-1 stimulation.