ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the clinical prognostic value of methylation of two non-coding repeat sequences, long interspersed element 1 (LINE-1) and Alu, in rectal tumour tissues. In addition to DNA methylation, expression of histone modifications H3K27me3 and H3K9Ac was studied in this patient cohort. METHODS: LINE-1 and Alu methylation were assessed in DNA extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues. A pilot (30 tumour and 25 normal tissues) and validation study (189 tumour and 53 normal tissues) were performed. Histone modifications H3K27me3 and H3K9Ac were immunohistochemically stained on tissue microarrays of the study cohort. RESULTS: In early-stage rectal cancer (stage I-II), hypomethylation of LINE-1 was an independent clinical prognostic factor, showing shorter patient survival (P=0.014; HR: 4.6) and a higher chance of tumour recurrence (P=0.001; HR: 9.6). Alu methylation did not show any significant correlation with clinical parameters, suggesting an active role of LINE-1 in tumour development. Expression of H3K27me3 (silencing gene expression) and H3K9Ac (activating gene expression) in relation to methylation status of LINE-1 and Alu supported this specific role of LINE-1 methylation. CONCLUSION: The epigenetic status of LINE-1, but not of Alu, is prognostic in rectal cancer, indicating an active role for LINE-1 in determining clinical outcome.
Subject(s)
DNA Methylation , Deoxyribonuclease I/genetics , Rectal Neoplasms/genetics , Clinical Trials as Topic , DNA, Neoplasm/chemistry , DNA, Neoplasm/genetics , Epigenomics , Female , Formaldehyde , Histones/genetics , Histones/metabolism , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Paraffin Embedding , Prognosis , Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic Acid , Tissue Fixation , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Debate on how to manage paediatric patients with cutaneous melanoma continues, particularly in those with sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases who are at higher risk of poor outcomes. Management is often based on adult algorithms, although differences in clinical outcomes between paediatric and adult patients suggest that melanoma in paediatric patients differs biologically. Yet, there are no molecular prognostic studies identifying these differences. OBJECTIVES: We investigated the epigenetic (methylation) regulation of several tumour-related genes (TRGs) known to be significant in adult melanoma progression in histopathology(+) SLN metastases (n = 17) and primary tumours (n = 20) of paediatric patients with melanoma to determine their clinical relevance. METHODS: Paediatric patients (n = 37; ≤ 21 years at diagnosis) with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage I-III cutaneous melanoma were analysed. Gene promoter methylation of the TRGs RASSF1A, RARß2, WIF1 and APC was evaluated. RESULTS: Hypermethylation of RASSF1A, RARß2, WIF1 and APC was found in 29% (5/17), 25% (4/16), 25% (4/16) and 19% (3/16) of histopathology(+) SLNs, respectively. When matched to adult cutaneous melanomas by Breslow thickness and ulceration, hypermethylation of all four TRGs in SLN(+) paediatric patients with melanoma was equivalent to or less than in adults. With a median follow-up of 55 months, SLN(+) paediatric patients with melanoma with hypermethylation of > 1 TRG vs. ≤ 1 TRG had worse disease-free (P = 0·02) and overall survival (P = 0·02). CONCLUSIONS: Differences in the methylation status of these TRGs in SLN(+) paediatric and adult patients with melanoma may account for why SLN(+) paediatric patients have different clinical outcomes. SLN biopsy should continue to be performed; within SLN(+) paediatric patients with melanoma, hypermethylation of TRGs can be used to identify a subpopulation at highest risk for poor outcomes who warrant vigilant clinical follow-up.
