Efficacy of anti-PD-1 monotherapy for recurrent or metastatic olfactory neuroblastoma.

Background: Olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) is a rare malignant tumor of the head and neck. Due to its rarity, standard systemic therapy for this condition has yet to be established. In particular, the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for the recurrent or metastatic (R/M) ONB population remains unclear. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 11 patients with R/M ONB who received any systemic chemotherapy at two Japanese institutions (National Cancer Center Hospital East and Kyushu Medical Center) between January 2002 and March 2022 and analyzed outcomes by use of anti-PD-1 antibody (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) monotherapy. Results: Of the 11 patients, 6 received ICI (ICI-containing treatment group) and the remaining 5 were treated with systemic therapy but not including ICI (ICI-non-containing treatment group). Overall survival (OS) was significantly longer in the ICI-containing group (median OS: not reached vs. 6.4 months, log-rank p-value: 0.035). The fraction of ICI systemic therapy in the entire treatment period of this group reached 85.9%. Four patients (66.7%) in the ICI-containing treatment group experienced immune-related adverse events (irAE), with grades of 1/2. No irAE of grade 3 or more was seen, and no patient required interruption or discontinuation of treatment due to toxicity. Conclusion: ICI monotherapy appears to be effective and to contribute to prolonged survival in R/M ONB.

Subsequent chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus cetuximab-based chemotherapy following immune checkpoint inhibitor in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are essential in treating recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN). However, the overall response rate (ORR) is limited to 10-20%, and subsequent chemotherapy is critical to maximizing the subjects' prognosis. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 59 patients with R/M SCCHN treated with paclitaxel+cetuximab (PE)-based chemotherapy (PCE, paclitaxel+carboplatin+cetuximab; or PTX+Cmab, paclitaxel+cetuximab) following disease progression after either pembrolizumab or nivolumab monotherapy. Results: Of 59 patients, 15 were treated with pembrolizumab, with an ORR of 13.3%, and the remaining 44 with nivolumab, with an ORR of 11.4%. All patients in the pembrolizumab cohort had platinum-sensitive disease. Following ICI treatment, 19 patients were treated with PCE and the remaining 40 with PTX+Cmab. PE-based chemotherapy induced favorable and prompt tumor shrinkage even in cases where ICI was not effective, with a median change in the summed dimensions of target lesions of -43.4%, resulting in an ORR of 62.7%. Median time to response was 1.8 months. The patients in the pembrolizumab cohort appeared to have a numerically higher response rate than those receiving nivolumab (80.0% vs. 56.8%). For the 59 patients, progression-free survival and overall survival, calculated from the initiation of PE-based chemotherapy, were 4.6 months and 17.1 months, respectively. Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 40.7%, and no treatment-related death was observed. Conclusion: PE-based chemotherapy following ICI is encouraging for its robust antitumor efficacy in R/M SCCHN.

Weekly paclitaxel, carboplatin and cetuximab (PCE) combination followed by nivolumab for recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN).

OBJECTIVES: Cetuximab-based chemotherapy is a standard 1st-line treatment for recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN). However, few studies have reported survival data for a treatment sequence consisting of a PCE regimen (paclitaxel + carboplatin + cetuximab) followed by an immune checkpoint inhibitor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively assessed 37 patients with R/M SCCHN from the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx who received PCE as 1st-line treatment followed by nivolumab as 2nd-line at the National Cancer Center Hospital East between December 2016 and July 2021. For comparison, we also analyzed 14 patients who did not receive nivolumab after PCE. RESULTS: Of the 37 patients who received nivolumab, overall response rate (ORR) by PCE was 48.6%, and median time to response and median progression-free survival (PFS) were 2.1 months (range: 0.8-4.8) and 4.4 months, respectively. In the nivolumab phase, ORR was 10.8%. 23 patients received 3rd-line therapy. Median PFS2, PFS3, and overall survival (OS) were 6.8, 11.6, and 19.5 months, respectively. Subgroup analysis by PD-L1 expression showed no significant difference in OS. Analysis of the comparison group revealed a trend toward improved OS in those who received nivolumab compared to those who did not (HR 0.47, 95%CI [0.19-1.13], p = 0.084). CONCLUSION: PCE followed by nivolumab shows a favorable survival outcome, representing the potential for rapid tumor response with PCE and extension of OS by the addition of nivolumab regardless of combined positive score.

Combination chemotherapy with taxane and platinum in patients with salivary gland carcinoma: a retrospective study of docetaxel plus cisplatin and paclitaxel plus carboplatin.

Background: Despite advances in precision medicine, most patients with recurrent or metastatic salivary gland carcinoma still need conventional chemotherapies, such as the combination of taxane and platinum. However, evidence for these standardized regimens is limited. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with salivary gland carcinoma treated with a taxane and platinum, which contained docetaxel at a dose of 60 mg/m2 plus cisplatin at a dose of 70 mg/m2 on day 1, or paclitaxel at a dose of 100 mg/m2 plus carboplatin at a dose of area under the plasma concentration-time curve = 2.5 on days 1 and 8 (both on 21-day cycles), between January 2000 and September 2021. Result: Forty patients with ten adenoid cystic carcinomas and thirty other pathologies were identified. Of these, 29 patients were treated with docetaxel plus cisplatin and 11 with paclitaxel plus carboplatin. For the total population, the objective response rate (ORR) and median progression-free survival (mPFS) were 37.5% and 5.4 months (95% confidence interval: 3.6-7.4 months), respectively. On subgroup analysis, docetaxel plus cisplatin provided favorable efficacy compared with paclitaxel plus carboplatin (ORR: 46.5% vs. 20.0%, mPFS: 7.2 vs. 2.8 months), and the findings were well retained in patients with adenoid cystic carcinoma (ORR: 60.0% vs. 0%, mPFS: 17.7 vs. 2.8 months). Grade 3/4 neutropenia was relatively frequent in the docetaxel plus cisplatin (59% vs.27%), although febrile neutropenia was uncommon (3%) in the cohort. No treatment-related death was seen in any case. Conclusion: The combination of taxane and platinum is generally effective and well-tolerated for recurrent or metastatic salivary gland carcinoma. In contrast, paclitaxel plus carboplatin appears unfavorable in terms of efficacy in certain patients, such as those with adenoid cystic carcinoma.

Potential efficacy of local therapy for progressive lesions after nivolumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

BACKGROUND: In recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN), local therapy (LT) such as surgery or radiotherapy can be treatment options for improved survival or quality of life. To date, however, few reports have addressed the efficacy of LT for sites of disease progression after immune checkpoint inhibitors, including other cancers. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with R/M SCCHN originating from the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx and treated with nivolumab. We extracted patients undergoing salvage LT or palliative radiotherapy (RT) to the selected progressive lesion at any time after initiation of nivolumab. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients received LT. Salvage LT was performed in 9 (37.5%) patients, including surgery and definitive RT in 5 and 4 patients, respectively. Palliative RT was performed in 15 (62.5%) patients. LT was provided in 10 (41.7%) patients for oligoprogressive disease. Twelve (50.0%) patients received subsequent systemic therapy immediately after LT. Classification based on patient treatment divided the population into four subgroups with different prognoses (salvage LT followed by subsequent systemic therapy [n = 3], salvage LT alone [n = 6], palliative RT followed by subsequent systemic therapy [n = 9], and palliative RT alone [n = 6]). Median OS in this order was 24.5, 9.0, 7.3, and 2.4 months (p = 0.001). All patients in the salvage LT followed by subsequent systemic therapy group continued nivolumab. CONCLUSION: In R/M SCCHN patients who have received nivolumab, salvage LT for the selected progressive lesion with continuation of nivolumab potentially provides an excellent survival prognosis.

Proton pump inhibitors and antibiotics adversely effect the efficacy of nivolumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

BACKGROUND: Several reports have shown that the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and antibiotics (Abx) can reduce the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in various cancers. To date, however, the association of immune checkpoint inhibitors with PPI and/or Abx in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M SCCHN) has not been reported. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with platinum-refractory R/M SCCHN treated with nivolumab from May 2017 and March 2020 in our institute. Primary sites included the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx and larynx. The relationship between prognostic parameters, such as overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), PFS2 and PFS3, and clinical factors, including PPI or Abx use, was examined, and the creation of prognostic classification was also attempted. RESULTS: Of 110 patients identified, 56 patients received PPI and 24 patients received Abx within 30 days before or after the initiation of nivolumab. With a median follow-up of 17.2 months (range: 13.8-25.0), median PFS, PFS2, PFS3 and OS were 3.2, 8.1, 14.0 and 17.2 months, respectively. In univariate analysis, the use of PPI and of Abx was significantly associated with poor prognosis in all parameters (PFS, PFS2, PFS3 and OS). Median OS (hazard ratio; 95%confidence interval, p-value) by these covariates were 13.6 versus 23.8 months (1.70; 1.01-2.87, p = 0.046) for PPI and 10.0 versus 20.1 months (1.85; 1.00-3.41, p = 0.048) for Abx, respectively. Furthermore, these factors showed mutually independent adverse associations on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: The use of PPI and Abx attenuated the efficacy of nivolumab in R/M SCCHN. Further prospective evaluation is warranted.

Induction chemotherapy with paclitaxel, carboplatin and cetuximab for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A single-center, retrospective study.

Background: The addition of induction chemotherapy (IC) before chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has improved survival over CRT alone in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer (LA-NPC). Nevertheless, this population would benefit from further development of a novel IC regimen with satisfactory efficacy and a more favorable safety profile. Methods: We retrospectively assessed 29 LA-NPC patients who received the combination of paclitaxel (PTX), carboplatin (CBDCA), and cetuximab (Cmab) (PCE) as IC (IC-PCE) at the National Cancer Center Hospital East between March 2017 and April 2021. IC-PCE consisted of CBDCA area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) = 1.5, PTX 80 mg/m2, and Cmab with an initial dose of 400 mg/m2 followed by 250 mg/m2 administered weekly for a maximum of eight weeks. Results: Patient characteristics were as follows: median age, 59 years (range 24-75); 0, 1 performance status (PS), 25, 4 patients; and clinical stage III/IVA/IVB, 6/10/13. The median number of PCE cycles was 8(1-8). After IC-PCE, 26 patients received concurrent cisplatin and radiotherapy (CDDP-RT), one received concurrent carboplatin/5-fluorouracil and radiotherapy (CBDCA/5-FU-RT), and two received RT alone. The % completion of CDDP-RT was 88.5%. The response rate was 75.9% by IC and 100% at completion of CRT. The 3-year recurrence-free survival, locoregional failure-free survival, distant recurrence-free survival, and overall survival were 75.9%, 79.3%, 84.3%, and 96.3%, respectively. The incidence of adverse events of grade 3/4 was 34.5% during IC and 44.8% during CRT. Conclusion: IC-PCE is feasible and effective for LA-NPC and may be a treatment option for this disease.

Biweekly administration of cetuximab in Japanese patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: Cetuximab (Cmab) plays an important role in the treatment for recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer (R/M HNC). To date, however, no safety data on biweekly administration of cetuximab at a dose of 500 mg/m2 (biweekly Cmab) for Japanese HNC patients have been available. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of five R/M HNC patients who received biweekly Cmab in our institute between January 2016 and September 2021 and compared the safety profile between two phases of weekly 250 mg/m2 and biweekly 500 mg/m2 Cmab in the identical patients. RESULTS: All patients initially received Cmab in combination with chemotherapy. Chemotherapy consisted of paclitaxel plus carboplatin in two patients, cisplatin + 5-FU in one patient, and paclitaxel in two patients. Three patients switched treatment schedule from weekly Cmab to biweekly Cmab, while two patients received biweekly Cmab after completion of chemotherapy. The main reason for switching to biweekly Cmab was an unacceptably long commuting time to the hospital. The median duration of Cmab was 217 days (49-321) during weekly Cmab with or without chemotherapy and 42 days (28-175) during biweekly Cmab. Median dose of biweekly Cmab was 4 (3-12). During biweekly Cmab, worsened (Grade ≥ 2) toxicities were observed in two patients: one with grade 2 dry skin and the second with grade 2 skin infection. None developed grade ≥ 3 adverse events or discontinued treatment due to Cmab-related adverse events. CONCLUSION: Biweekly Cmab was well tolerated and did not demonstrate severe toxicities related to Cmab for R/M HNC.

A comparison between sniffing and blowing for olfactory testing before and after laryngectomy.

PURPOSE: Olfactory dysfunction occurs after laryngectomy due to the loss of nasal airflow and inability to sniff. However, the reason for the loss of olfactory function after laryngectomy is unclear on evaluation with sniffing type tests performed individually. It is expected that the sensorineural olfaction remains, and the results of the sniffing test would be negative, while that of the odour-blowing test would be positive. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate both tests and prove normal olfaction in the patients. METHODS: Patients who had undergone laryngectomy were evaluated using the T&T olfactometer for odour-sniffing tests, Jet Stream Olfactometer (JSO) for odour-blowing tests, and visual analogue scale (VAS). Evaluations were performed pre-operatively, and 1 month, 6 months, and 1-year post-laryngectomy. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were included in the study. The median recognition thresholds using the T&T and JSO were 1.4 and 2.2 before surgery, 5.8 and 5.4 at 1 month, 5.8 and 5.2 at 6 months, and 5.8 and 5.0 at 1 year after surgery, respectively. Results of the olfactory threshold test in both T&T and JSO and VAS score were significantly worse after surgery compared to that before laryngectomy (p < 0.05). The degree of increase was significantly smaller with JSO than with T&T (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: While we could not prove normal olfaction in patients after laryngectomy, the odour-blowing test was superior to the odour-sniffing test in detecting patients with residual olfaction. Simply blowing a scent is insufficient to obtain good olfaction; active airflow is crucial for recognizing odours.