Complications and reproductive outcome after uterine artery embolization for retained products of conception.

AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the complications and reproductive outcome after uterine artery embolization (UAE) for retained products of conception (RPOC). METHODS: This was a retrospective medical-records review study of 57 women treated for RPOC. Participants were divided into two groups: women who underwent treatment with UAE (UAE group: n = 32, 56.1%) and those without UAE (control group: n = 25, 43.9%). The complications and reproductive outcomes were compared between the two groups. Information on subsequent pregnancies and their outcomes was available for 30 women who attempted to conceive. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the interval from the last delivery or abortion (40.1 ± 3.4 vs 51.0 ± 5.1 months, respectively; P = 0.16), the rate of severe bleeding under hysteroscopy (18.5 vs 9.1%, respectively; P = 0.65), the conception rate (58.8 vs 61.5%, respectively; P = 1.0) and mean time to conception (9.9 ± 1.6 vs 11.0 ± 2.9 months, respectively; P = 0.17) in women in the UAE group compared with those in the control group. Rates of post-partum hemorrhage (PPH) and manual removal of placenta (25.0% in the UAE group and 16.7% in the control group, respectively) were higher than the general population. CONCLUSION: Selective UAE for RPOC may be a preferable procedure in women who are suspected as having a risk of severe bleeding under treatment. Women who were treated for RPOC, regardless of UAE, were at risk of PPH and difficulty in removing the placenta in future pregnancies.

Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis for patients with Asherman's syndrome: menstrual and fertility outcomes.

Purpose: Most patients with Asherman's syndrome present with infertility and menstrual problems. In this retrospective clinical study, we analyzed patients with Asherman's syndrome who underwent hysteroscopic adhesiolysis to examine their associated symptoms, disease etiologies, and fertility outcomes. Methods: Twenty-seven patients with Asherman's syndrome that were diagnosed using hysteroscopy were recruited. The chief complaints were infertility, hypomenorrhea, and amenorrhea. Each case of Asherman's syndrome was classified according to the American Fertility Society classification. Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis was performed in all cases and concomitant transabdominal ultrasonography was conducted in cases with extensive and dense adhesions. Results: There were no complications associated with the hysteroscopic procedure. Normal menstrual cycles resumed in all cases. Of the 16 infertile patients, 9 conceived. Three patients achieved term deliveries and one patient is currently pregnant. None of the patients had obstetric complications. Two patients had spontaneous abortions, one had an ectopic pregnancy, one had an abortion at 16 weeks' gestation due to cervical incompetence, and one had a molar pregnancy and required uterine artery embolization for uncontrolled hemorrhaging during a dilatation and curettage procedure. Conclusions: Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis with transabdominal ultrasonography is a suitable treatment method for Asherman's syndrome. Subfertile patients with Asherman's syndrome undergoing adhesiolysis should be appropriately informed about the risk of associated life-threatening complications and preterm delivery.