Nutritional State and Feeding Behaviors of Children With Eosinophilic Esophagitis and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

OBJECTIVE: As both gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) are associated with malnutrition and feeding dysfunction, this study compares growth, nutrition, and feeding behaviors in children with GERD and EoE. METHODS: Subjects ages 1 to 7 years with GERD or EoE were enrolled in a prospective study. Assessments included length/height, weight, 3-day food diary, serum biomarkers of nutrition, and the Behavioral Pediatric Feeding Assessment Scale. RESULTS: Mean weight-for-length z scores in GERD and EoE children were -0.93 and -1.14 (p = NS) and mean body mass index z scores were 0.29 and -0.13 (P = NS). Vitamin D intake was below the daily recommended intake in GERD subjects. EoE subjects' intake was below daily recommended intake of Vitamin D and calcium. GERD and EoE groups both had normal intake of calories, carbohydrates, proteins, fats, and iron, and normal serum ferritin (25 vs 34 ng/mL), prealbumin (21 vs 20 mg/dL), parathyroid hormone (42 vs 37 pg/mL), and Vitamin D (both 30 ng/mL). Behavioral Pediatric Feeding Assessment Scale problem and frequency scores were similar in GERD and EoE subjects but were higher than those of a historical cohort of healthy controls (Hedges' g of 0.95 and 1.1, respectively). EoE subjects on food allergen restriction diets had significantly less feeding dysfunction than those on regular diets. CONCLUSIONS: As a selected group of children with uncomplicated GERD or EoE were without nutritional deficiencies but had maladaptive feeding, providing anticipatory guidance to minimize mealtime challenges, monitoring for improvement, or referring to a feeding therapist, may be beneficial. A trial of food allergen restriction may provide additional benefit for those with EoE.

Preoperative liver reduction utilizing a novel nutritional supplement.

BACKGROUND: One of the most common reasons for conversion in bariatric surgery is hepatomegaly caused by inadequate exposure of the proximal stomach. This study utilizes a novel nutritional supplement with a calorie-restricted diet to reduce liver volume preoperatively. METHODS: A consecutive series of morbidly obese patients consumed a nutritional supplement called Nuvista(®) for 4 weeks preoperatively. Preoperatively, each patient completed baseline demographics, blood work, urine ketone analysis, ultrasonography of the left lateral segment, and multiple questionnaires. At the time of surgery, these studies were repeated. Data were analyzed using a paired t-test and bivariate analysis where appropriate. A P<.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Four men and 17 women were recruited with a mean preoperative weight and body mass index of 122.7±15.9 kg and 44.5±3.9, respectively. Mean preoperative liver volume of the left lateral segment was 562.5±291.3 cm(3). After 4 weeks of Nuvista, the mean weight and body mass index decreased significantly to 118.9±15.5 kg and 43.1±3.4, respectively (P<.001). The mean liver volume of the left lateral segment was significantly reduced to 299.9±162.1 cm(3) (P<.001). Mean liver reduction was 43.4%±17.2% (13.6%-81.9%, P<.05). Urinary ketone scores did not show any evidence of starvation. No preoperative factors correlated with liver volume reduction. CONCLUSION: Utilizing Nuvista, as part of a preoperative 4-week calorie-restricted regimen, significantly reduced lateral segment liver volume by 43.4%. This preoperative regimen incorporates healthy behavioral changes that are necessary to sustain long-term weight loss.