Treating Hallux Valgus Associated Metatarsus Adductus by Minimally Invasive Surgery: A Simple Solution for a Difficult Problem.

This study aims to assess a novel minimally invasive surgical technique that addresses hallux valgus accompanied by metatarsus adductus. We retrospectively analysed the results of 20 patients (21 feet) that underwent a newly developed percutaneous osteotomy procedure of the lesser metatarsal bones in order to correct hallux valgus deformities accompanied by metatarsus adductus. We used x-ray studies in order to evaluate changes in the hallux valgus angle, the first intermetatarsal angle, and the metatarsal angle (using the modified Sgarlato method). We also compared the pre- and postoperative American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society scores when available. The paired sample t test was used to compare variables. At a 1-y follow-up the mean hallux valgus angle, inter-metatarsal angle and the metatarsal angle have been reduced by 31.62 (-3 to 9), 3.86 (11-52) and 14.69 (4-36) respectively (p < .001 for all). The mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score (n = 15 feet available) has been improved by a mean of 44.53 (22-72, p < .001). In addition, the patient satisfaction rates were high. Patients suffered from mild to moderate midfoot pain during the first few weeks following surgery, which resolved when union occurred. No cases of lesser metatarsal nonunion have been documented. The presented minimally invasive method can be used effectively to correct hallux valgus that is associated with metatarsus adductus. Proximal minimally invasive metatarsal osteotomy can effectively correct hallux valgus accompanied by metatarsus adductus.

Platelet-Rich Plasma for Knee Osteoarthritis: Internet Marketing and Patient Education-An Appraisal of Content for Websites with the Greatest Search Engine Visibility.

OBJECTIVE: The internet is increasingly being used as a resource for health-related information by the general public. We sought to establish the authorship, content, and accuracy of the information available online regarding platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy for knee osteoarthritis. DESIGN: Top 200 search results from each of the 3 leading search engines available online (Google, Yahoo!, Bing) were screened, and 181 websites were finally reviewed for content with emphasis on specific claims, comparing between websites authored by private physicians/groups and other authorship types. RESULTS: Nearly 80% of the websites claimed that PRP injections for osteoarthritis of the knee improve patients' pain. A total of 42.8% of the private websites and 27.6% of nonprivate websites have stated that the procedure can delay or eliminate the need for future surgery. Costs were only mentioned by few (11.6%), and mainly by the nonprivate websites. Both website groups were unlikely to mention that PRP therapy is not the treatment of choice for end-stage knee osteoarthritis (7.9% of private and 17.2% of the nonprivate sites), or to state that patients with less advanced disease may benefit more from the treatment (11.8% and 20.6%, respectively). Private websites were less likely to refer to peer-reviewed literature (18.4% vs. 41.4%) and were more than 3 times less likely to mention lack of adequate evidence (13.2% vs. 48.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients seeking online information regarding PRP therapy are vulnerable to websites presenting a narrow viewpoint of this treatment modality, putting emphasis on unsubstantiated benefits while disregarding potential drawbacks and concerns.

Expandable proximal femoral nail versus gamma proximal femoral nail for the treatment of AO/OTA 31A1-3 fractures.

INTRODUCTION: The gamma-proximal femoral nail (GPFN) and the expandable proximal femoral nail (EPFN) are two commonly used intramedullary devices for the treatment of AO 31A1-3 proximal femur fractures. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes and complication rates in patients treated by both devices. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 299 patients (149 in the GPFN group and 150 in the EPFN group, average age 83.6 years) were treated for AO 31A1-3 proximal femur fractures in our institution between July 2008 and February 2013. Time from presentation to surgery, level of experience of the surgeon, operative time, amount of blood loss and number of blood transfusions were recorded. Postoperative radiological variables, including peg/screw location, tip to apex distance and orthopaedic complications, as, malunion, nonunion, surgical wound infection rates, cutouts, periprosthetic fractures and the incidence of non-orthopaedic complications. Functional results were estimated using the modified Harris Hip Score, and quality of life was queried by the SF-36 questionnaire. RESULTS: The GPFN and the EPFN fixation methods were similar in terms of functional outcomes, complication rates and quality of life assessments. More patients (107 vs. 73) from the GPFN group were operated within 48 h from presentation (44.8 h vs. 49.9 h for the EPFN group, p=0.351), and their surgery duration and hospitalisation were significantly longer (18.5 days vs. 26 days, respectively, p<0.001). The GPFN patients were frequently operated by junior surgeons: 90% (135) while 50.6% (76) of the EPFN operations were performed by senior doctors. Other intraoperative measures were similar between groups. Cutout was the most common complication affecting 6.7% of the GPFN group and 3.3% of the EPFN group (p=0.182). CONCLUSIONS: Good clinical outcomes and low complication rates in the GPFN and the EPFN groups indicate essentially equivalent safety and reliability on the part of both devices for the treatment of proximal femoral fractures.