ABSTRACT
Objectives: Sexually transmitted infections are a prevalent global health care problem. Treatment guidelines have recently been updated as a result of antimicrobial resistance and public health trends. The aim of the study was to assess the appropriateness of empirical antibiotic therapy prescribed for cervicitis and urethritis in the emergency department. Methods: We designed a retrospective observational cohort study. We included adult patients with suspected cervicitis or urethritis who attended the emergency department of a tertiary hospital in 2020. We excluded patients with suspected pelvic inflammatory disease, pregnancy or prostatitis and those requiring admission to hospital. Appropriateness of empirical antibiotic therapy was evaluated taking into account 4 aspects: indication, dosing, duration of therapy, and route of administration. Data were obtained from the electronic medical record, the electronic prescription program, and the discharge summary. Results: The study population comprised 176 patients; mean age was 28.9 years (SD = 7.7), and 90.9% were men. The most prescribed treatment was the combination of ceftriaxone and azithromycin (83.0%). Treatment was inappropriate in 71.6% of patients. A total of 159 drug errors were recorded. The most frequent cause was undertreatment (36.4%) related to underdosing (46.5%), particularly with regard to ceftriaxone. The percentage of errors was 11.9% for indication, 84.9% for dosing, 3.1% for duration, and 0% for route of administration. Conclusions: A high percentage of patients who attended the emergency department for suspected cervicitis or urethritis received an inappropriate empirical antibiotic regimen. The main reason was undertreatment due to underdosing.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Worldwide organisations advocate standardising the management of intravenous drugs as an essential strategy to increase safety in paediatric healthcare settings. Intravenous administration is a route associated with some potential complications. Many adverse events are related to the use of intravenous medications, and the great variability in their handling and preparation represents an added risk that jeopardises the safety of children. PURPOSE: To standardise the dilutions of intravenous drugs most commonly administered to Spanish hospitalised paediatric and neonatal patients. METHODS: The process leading to the standardisation of concentrations was undertaken following a two-round modified Delphi procedure. The consensus included the most common drugs administered by continuous or intermittent intravenous infusion to hospitalised and/or critically ill paediatric patients. RESULTS: For paediatric patients, the proposal included a total of 102 drugs (45 continuous infusion and 59 intermittent infusion), with 192 concentrations to be standardised. The final consensus included 101 drugs (99%), of which 44 were continuous infusion and 59 intermittent infusion; 160 concentrations were standardised (72.7%). For neonates, the initial proposal included 80 drugs (38 continuous infusion and 43 intermittent infusion), with 189 concentrations to be standardised. The final consensus included 80 drugs (100%), of which 38 were continuous infusion and 43 were intermittent infusion; 120 concentrations were standardised (49.2%). CONCLUSIONS: This proposal showed that standardisation is a feasible approach that can be reached by other healthcare institutions. It can be used in other centres and contribute in the future to unifying paediatric clinical practice.
ABSTRACT
Background: We report the long-term outcomes, changes in laboratory parameters, the incidence of secondary nosocomial infections and treatment cost of a Spanish cohort of patients with severe COVID-19 that received tocilizumab (TCZ).Methods: Retrospective cohort of PCR confirmed adult patients who received TCZ from March 1 to 24, 2020 in a tertiary hospital was analyzed. Patients were followed up until 10 May 2020.Results: We included 162 patients (median age 64 years; 70.4% male). At time of TCZ administration, 48.1% of patients were on invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Over a median follow-up of 53 days, 46.9% of patients were discharge in good conditions and 19.8% were still hospitalized. The overall mortality was 33.3%, being higher in patients on IMV than those who did not (46.2% vs 26.7%, P < 0.001). A significant improvement in the lymphocyte count, C-reactive protein, lactate dehydrogenase, and D-dimer was observed. Overall, 43.2% patients presented nosocomial infections, causing death in 8%. Infections were more prevalent in ICU units (63.0% vs 17.1%, P < 0.001). The total cost of TCZ was 371,784.Conclusions: Among the patients who used TCZ, one third died, regardless the improvement in some inflammatory biomarkers. The incidence of secondary nosocomial infections was high.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Spain/epidemiologyABSTRACT
OBJETIVOS: Analizar la gravedad de los errores de conciliación (EC) producidos en el servicio de urgencias (SU) en pacientes que ingresan en una unidad de agudos de geriatría. Cuantificar y describir las discrepancias y los EC. Analizar los grupos farmacológicos y los factores de riesgo. MÉTODO: Estudio observacional prospectivo. Un farmacéutico realizó la historia farmacoterapéutica y comparó el tratamiento habitual con el prescrito en el SU, identificó discrepancias y posibles EC y un geriatra evaluó su gravedad. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 351 pacientes, de los que 328 (93,8%) presentaron discrepancias, 151 pacientes (43,02%) presentaron al menos 1 EC. Se observaron 300 EC de los que 248 (82,7%) alcanzaron al paciente, y 27 EC (9%) produjeron daño reversible. No hubo ningún error que causase daño prolongado o mortal. CONCLUSIONES: Los EC fueron frecuentes pero de escasa gravedad, y los daños que ocasionaron fueron reversibles
OBJECTIVES: To analyze the seriousness of medication reconciliation errors (MREs) in the treatment of older patients admitted to an emergency department's acute geriatric unit. To identify and describe discrepancies, including the drug groups involved, and to explore risk factors. METHODS: Prospective, observational 6-month study. A pharmacist recorded medications in each patient's history and compared the patient's usual treatment to the regimen prescribed in the emergency department; discrepancies were flagged for evaluation as possible MREs. A geriatric medicine specialist evaluated MRE seriousness. RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-eight discrepancies were detected (93.8% of the total of 351 patients); 151 patients (43.02%) had at least 1 MRE. Three hundred MREs were identified, 248 (82.7%) reached the patient, and 27 (9%) caused reversible injury. No errors led to prolonged injury or death. CONCLUSIONS: MREs were common but not serious, and the injuries caused were reversible
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Medication Reconciliation , Risk Factors , Medication Errors/classification , Prospective Studies , Confidence Intervals , PolypharmacyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To analyze the seriousness of medication reconciliation errors (MREs) in the treatment of older patients admitted to an emergency department's acute geriatric unit. To identify and describe discrepancies, including the drug groups involved, and to explore risk factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective, observational 6-month study. A pharmacist recorded medications in each patient's history and compared the patient's usual treatment to the regimen prescribed in the emergency department; discrepancies were flagged for evaluation as possible MREs. A geriatric medicine specialist evaluated MRE seriousness. RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-eight discrepancies were detected (93.8% of the total of 351 patients); 151 patients (43.02%) had at least 1 MRE. Three hundred MREs were identified, 248 (82.7%) reached the patient, and 27 (9%) caused reversible injury. No errors led to prolonged injury or death. CONCLUSION: MREs were common but not serious, and the injuries caused were reversible.
OBJETIVO: Analizar la gravedad de los errores de conciliación (EC) producidos en el servicio de urgencias (SU) en pacientes que ingresan en una unidad de agudos de geriatría. Cuantificar y describir las discrepancias y los EC. Analizar los grupos farmacológicos y los factores de riesgo. METODO: Estudio observacional prospectivo. Un farmacéutico realizó la historia farmacoterapéutica y comparó el tratamiento habitual con el prescrito en el SU, identificó discrepancias y posibles EC y un geriatra evaluó su gravedad. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 351 pacientes, de los que 328 (93,8%) presentaron discrepancias, 151 pacientes (43,02%) presentaron al menos 1 EC. Se observaron 300 EC de los que 248 (82,7%) alcanzaron al paciente, y 27 EC (9%) produjeron daño reversible. No hubo ningún error que causase daño prolongado o mortal. CONCLUSIONES: Los EC fueron frecuentes pero de escasa gravedad, y los daños que ocasionaron fueron reversibles.
