Differentiating between stress- and EPT-induced electrodermal activity during dental examination.

Dental pain invokes the sympathetic nervous system, which can be measured by electrodermal activity (EDA). In the dental clinic, accurate quantification of pain is needed because it could enable optimized drug-dose treatments, thereby potentially reducing drug addiction. However, a confounding factor is that during pain there is also lingering residual stress, hence, both contribute to the EDA response. Therefore, we investigated whether EDA can differentiate stress from pain during dental examination. The use of electrical pulp test (EPT) is an ideal approach to tease out the dynamics of stress and mimic pain with lingering residual stress. Once the electrical sensation is felt and reaches a critical current threshold, the subject removes the probe from their tooth, hence, this stage of data represents largely EPT stimulus and the residual stress-induced EDA response is smaller. EPT was performed on necrotic and vital teeth in fifty-one subjects. We defined four different data groups of reactions based on each individual's EPT intensity level expectation based on the visual analog scale (VAS) of their baseline trial, as follows: mild stress, mild stress + EPT, strong stress, and strong stress + EPT. EDA-derived features exhibited significant difference between residual lingering stress + EPT groups and stress groups. We obtained 84.6% accuracy with 76.2% sensitivity and 86.8% specificity with multilayer perceptron in differentiating between pure-stress groups vs. stress + EPT groups. Moreover, EPT induced much greater EDA amplitude and faster response than stress. Our finding suggests that our machine learning approach can discriminate between stress and EPT stimulation in EDA signals.

The use of electrodermal activity in pulpal diagnosis and dental pain assessment.

AIMS: To explore whether electrodermal activity (EDA) can serve as a complementary tool for pulpal diagnosis (Aim 1) and an objective metric to assess dental pain before and after local anaesthesia (Aim 2). METHODOLOGY: A total of 53 subjects (189 teeth) and 14 subjects (14 teeth) were recruited for Aim 1 and Aim 2, respectively. We recorded EDA using commercially available devices, PowerLab and Galvanic Skin Response (GSR) Amplifier, in conjunction with cold and electric pulp testing (EPT). Participants rated their level of sensation on a 0-10 visual analogue scale (VAS) after each test. We recorded EPT-stimulated EDA activity before and after the administration of local anaesthesia for participants who required root canal treatment (RCT) due to painful pulpitis. The raw data were converted to the time-varying index of sympathetic activity (TVSymp), a sensitive and specific parameter of EDA. Statistical analysis was performed using Python 3.6 and its Scikit-post hoc library. RESULTS: Electrodermal activity was upregulated by the stimuli of cold and EPT testing in the normal pulp. TVSymp signals were significantly increased in vital pulp compared to necrotic pulp by both cold test and EPT. Teeth that exhibited intensive sensitivity to cold with or without lingering pain had increased peak numbers of TVSymp than teeth with mild sensation to cold. Pre- and post-anaesthesia EDA activity and VAS scores were recorded in patients with painful pulpitis. Post-anaesthesia EDA signals were significantly lower compared to pre-anaesthesia levels. Approximately 71% of patients (10 of 14 patients) experienced no pain during treatment and reported VAS score of 0 or 1. The majority of patients (10 of 14) showed a reduction of TVSymp after the administration of anaesthesia. Two of three patients who experienced increased pain during RCT (post-treatment VAS > pre-treatment VAS) exhibited increased post-anaesthesia TVSymp. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show promising results for using EDA in pulpal diagnosis and for assessing dental pain. Whilst our testing was limited to subjects who had adequate communication skills, our future goal is to be able to use this technology to aid in the endodontic diagnosis of patients who have limited communication ability.