ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Quality of life has improved dramatically over the past two decades in people with cystic fibrosis (CF). Quantification has been enabled by patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs); however, many are lengthy and can be challenging to use in routine clinical practice. We propose a short-form PROM that correlates well with established quality-of-life measures. METHODS: We evaluated the utility of a 10-item score (AWESCORE) by measuring reliability, validity and responsiveness in adults with CF. The questions were developed by thematic analysis of survey questions to patients in a single adult CF centre. Each question was scored using a numerical rating scale 0 to 10. Total scores ranged from 0 to 100. Test-retest reliability was assessed over 24â h. To determine validity, comparisons were sought between stable subjects and those in pulmonary exacerbation, and between AWESCORE and Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire - Revised (CFQ-R). Responsiveness to pulmonary exacerbation in individual subjects was evaluated. RESULTS: Five domains, each with two questions, were identified for respiratory, physical, nutritional, psychological and general health. A total of 246 consecutive adults attending the outpatient clinic completed the AWESCORE. Scores were higher during clinical stability compared to pulmonary exacerbation (mean± sd): 73±11 versus 48±11 (p<0.001). Each domain scored worse during an acute exacerbation (p<0.001). No differences in reliability were observed in scores on retesting using Bland-Altman comparison. The CFQ-R scores (mean±sd: 813±125) and AWESCORE (81±13) were moderately correlated (Pearson's r=0.649; p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The AWESCORE is valid, reliable and responsive to altered health status in CF.
ABSTRACT
The relevance of medical colleges has been questioned and their ability to respond to members' needs and system failures is unknown. We hypothesise that members believe that medical colleges are relevant to the current health agenda. We conducted a survey by email to determine satisfaction with the current state of the Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP) relevance and tested agreement with suggestions for change. We found that of 21 000 survey links sent, 13.1% of addressees replied. When questioned regarding the current state, less than 50% of respondents agreed with any of eight positive statements. Over two thirds supported involvement in policy and advocacy, as well as the use of digital plebiscites to express their views. Clarity around the use of members' subscriptions and value for money had the lowest scores. Of importance was the expression of need for a medical college (71%) and the finding that 58% of respondents would give more time to the RACP if asked. Of all respondents, 22% provided written comments that closely reflected scores on categorical questions. We conclude that, despite reported disengagement and lack of support for the current state, the majority of respondents to a survey of relevance believed in the need for a medical college.
