Timing of Antenatal Steroid Administration and Effects on the Newborn Infant: A Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: The timing of antenatal steroids (ANS) on short- and long-term effects on newborn infants was evaluated. STUDY DESIGN: This study was conducted at the University of Cincinnati Medical Center Level-III Neonatal Intensive Care Unit by reviewing the medical records of all women with history of ANS exposure from January 2015 to December 2018. We compared outcomes of newborns delivered within the ideal therapeutic window of 24 hours to 7 days (within window [WW]) after administration to those exposed and delivered outside the therapeutic window (outside window primary group [OWP]). Outcomes included anthropometrics, blood sugars, thyroid hormone profile, and neonatal morbidities. RESULTS: A total of 669 patients were identified as having received at least two doses of ANS. Two-thirds of them delivered within the ideal therapeutic window. Significant differences were found in anthroprometrics including lower birth weight, shorter length, and smaller head circumferences in those born within the window compared with those outside the window. Derangements in glucose homeostasis requiring treatment and elevations of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) were seen in infants born outside the ideal therapeutic window compared with those born within the therapeutic window. No differences were found in neonatal morbidities including severe intraventricular hemorrhage (sIVH), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), need for resuscitation, exogenous surfactant administration, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), mechanical ventilation, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), or periventricular leukomalacia (PVL). After controlling for selected covariates, only birth length was different between the groups. CONCLUSION: Effects on anthropometrics, glucose homeostasis, and thyroid function support the need to develop new or refine existing risk stratification systems to time the administration of antenatal steroids. Better targeting of women and fetuses may confer the benefits of systemic corticosteroids while mitigating the risks of adverse effects. KEY POINTS: · The timing of antenatal steroids on short and long-term effects on newborn infants was evaluated.. · Differences were found in anthroprometrics, glucoses, and thyroid function.. · No differences were found in neonatal morbidities..

Buprenorphine pharmacotherapy for the management of neonatal abstinence syndrome in methadone-exposed neonates.

We aimed to compare the outcomes of pharmacotherapy with either buprenorphine or methadone in infants treated for neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) secondary to intrauterine exposure to methadone. This is a multi-center, retrospective cohort study to assess length of treatment (LOT), hospital length of stay (LOS), and cumulative opioid exposure between infants treated with either methadone or buprenorphine for NAS secondary to in utero exposure to methadone. Infants delivered at a gestational age ≥35 weeks and a maternal history of opioid-use disorder and/or urine drug screen positive for methadone, and postnatal pharmacotherapy for NAS with either buprenorphine or methadone as first-line opioid replacement therapy, were eligible. Median LOT, LOS, and cumulative opioid exposure were compared between buprenorphine- and methadone-treated infants. A total of 156 infants (48 treated with buprenorphine and 108 with methadone) were identified. The median LOT and LOS for buprenorphine-treated infants was 8 and 13 days compared with 15 and 20 days for methadone-treated infants, respectively, P < .001 for both outcomes. Median cumulative opioid dose in morphine equivalents was 0.6 mg/kg for buprenorphine-treated infants vs 1.05 mg/kg for methadone-treated infants, P < .001. No adverse effects were noted among either group. Of infants treated with buprenorphine, 34 (71%) required the addition of adjunctive pharmacotherapy during the NICU stay, compared with 31 (32%) in the methadone-treated group, P = .0008. However, significantly fewer infants treated with buprenorphine required continuation of therapy beyond discharge as compared with those treated with methadone. The difference is most likely a reflection of the protocols used by the sites. In infants that required pharmacotherapy for NAS secondary to intrauterine exposure to methadone, treatment with buprenorphine, compared with methadone therapy, was associated with better outcomes. If confirmed with prospective data, buprenorphine could be considered first-line therapy for the two medication-assisted treatment regimens recommended by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

Early Prediction Tool to Identify the Need for Pharmacotherapy in Infants at Risk of Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a tool to predict the need for pharmacologic treatment of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) within 36 hours from birth in infants at risk for opioid withdrawal. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study of infants born at gestation of ≥34 weeks with in utero exposure to opioids during two time periods from January 2013 through October 2016. Period 1 was used to develop a predictive tool for validation during period 2. Birth weight, gestational age, four categories of opioid exposure, and individual scores for 21 withdrawal symptoms from the Modified Finnegan Score at 36 hours of life were recorded. During period 1, a best subsets multiple regression analysis was performed on factors that were associated with pharmacotherapy on univariate analysis. Two tools were designed: one based on three highly predictive symptoms associated with need for pharmacotherapy for NAS and the other incorporating opioid exposure. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for the tools were calculated during period 2. RESULTS: The study included 264 infants (period 1, n=143; period 2, n=121). Polysubstance exposure and three withdrawal symptoms present at 36 hours of life that were significantly associated with pharmacotherapy for NAS comprised the tools. The "symptoms only tool" was able to predict that infants with a score <1 would not receive pharmacotherapy, and infants with scores of ≥4 would receive pharmacotherapy with positive predictive values of 90% and 100%, respectively. When opioid exposure was included, the "symptoms + exposure tool" was able to predict that infants with a score of ≤1 would not receive pharmacotherapy and infants with scores of ≥5 would receive pharmacotherapy with positive predictive values of 94% and 86%, respectively. CONCLUSION: An NAS prediction tool combining three clinical signs with and without category of opioid exposure had high positive predictive values for requiring and for not requiring pharmacotherapy. This tool may expedite pharmacotherapy decisions and optimize management for infants at risk for NAS.