Original Research: Nurses' Experiences with Racial, Ethnic, Cultural, and Religious Discrimination in the Workplace: A Qualitative Study.

BACKGROUND: As the health care workforce diversifies, understanding and addressing the lived experiences of health care professionals facing prejudice and discrimination becomes increasingly important. Previous studies have focused on physicians and medical trainees, but there remains a dearth of research exploring nurses' experiences-even though nurses make up the largest sector of the nation's health care workforce. OBJECTIVE: This qualitative study explored nurses' experiences of personally mediated workplace discrimination based on race, ethnicity, culture, or religion. METHODS: We conducted in-depth interviews with a convenience sample of 15 RNs at one academic medical center. Using an inductive thematic analysis approach, we identified several themes emerging from RNs' experiences and responses to a discriminatory event ("encounter"). Themes were grouped across three phases: pre-encounter, encounter, and post-encounter. RESULTS: Participants reported wide-ranging experiences, from insensitive joking to overt exclusion, coming from various people including patients, patients' family members, colleagues, and physicians. For many, discrimination was cumulative: similar encounters occurred outside the workplace as well as within the clinical setting, often repeatedly, and were influenced by the sociopolitical context. Participants reported a variety of responses, including emotional reactions such as shock, fear of retaliation, and frustration at being expected to represent one's identity group. Silence or inaction predominated bystander and supervisor responses. Although the encounters themselves were fleeting, their impact was enduring. Early-career encounters were most challenging, and participants grappled internally with lasting effects for years. Long-term effects included avoidance of perpetrators, disconnection from colleagues and their own professional role, and leaving the workplace. CONCLUSIONS: The findings illuminate nurses' experiences with racial, ethnic, cultural, and religious discrimination in the workplace. Understanding how such discrimination affects nurses is critical to developing effective responses to encounters, creating safer workplaces, and promoting equity within the profession.

Clinicians' Perspectives on the Impacts of Post-2016 Immigration Enforcement on Immigrant Health and Health Care Use.

OBJECTIVE: To examine clinicians' perspectives on changes in health and health care utilization of immigrant patients, the presence of immigration enforcement in health facilities, and institutional responses to these changes in the post-2016 period in the United States. METHODS: From a survey of clinician members of the Physicians for Human Rights Asylum Network (March-June 2020), we described responses and identified key themes. RESULTS: Post-2016 anti-immigrant policies and rhetoric negatively affected mental health, physical health, and health care-seeking behaviors among immigrant patients. Although most clinicians reported rarely witnessing immigration enforcement activities, nearly half reported persistent fear among their immigrant patients. A higher percentage of clinicians in U.S. border states reported increased fears associated with adverse physical and mental health effects among immigrant patients than those in non-border states. CONCLUSION: Clinicians' perspectives on the impact of immigration enforcement on patient health is critical to informing multi-level interventions to improve immigrant health.

Challenges in Founding and Developing Medical School Student-Run Asylum Clinics.

In response to the rapidly rising number of asylum applications, student-run asylum clinics (SRACs) designed to provide pro bono forensic medical evaluations have emerged at medical schools across the United States. Distinct from traditional student-run clinics in the services they provide and in their operational models, SRACs face a unique set of challenges. This study aims to identify the common challenges in building SRACs and to collect insights to inform a structured approach to collaborative problem-solving. This study gathered data from online surveys and semi-structured phone interviews with representative medical student SRAC leaders. 14 clinics participated in the 2017 online survey, 15 clinics in the 2018 online survey, and eight clinics in the 2018-2019 phone interviews. We identified common challenges in five areas: volunteer recruitment, clinic operations, case demand, institutional support, and leadership. SRACs stand to benefit from ongoing extramural collaborations to overcome shared challenges.

Partner notification and treatment for sexually transmitted infections among pregnant women in Cape Town, South Africa.

Curable sexually transmitted infections (STIs) including Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG), and Trichomonas vaginalis (TV) are associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Partner notification is an important component of STI control as it has been shown to prevent re-infection and reduce infectious burden. Between October 2017 and February 2019, we conducted a cohort study of women attending antenatal care in Cape Town, South Africa. Self-collected vulvovaginal swabs were tested for CT, NG, and TV using Xpert® assays at first antenatal visit, during the third trimester, and postpartum. At the visit following a positive diagnosis, women were asked if they notified their partner and if their partner was treated. Among 242 participants, 97% reported being willing to notify partners if they tested positive and 78% thought their partner would be willing to treat the STI. Of the 73 women who were diagnosed with one or more STIs and reported having a sex partner, 93% reported notifying their partner and 63% reported their partner was treated. Younger maternal age was associated with partner notification and treatment (OR = 3.82; 95%CI = 1.34-10.90). Acceptability of partner notification was high in pregnant women, but partner treatment was low. Future interventions to improve partner notification and treatment are needed.

Prevalence and correlates of sexually transmitted infections in pregnancy in HIV-infected and- uninfected women in Cape Town, South Africa.

OBJECTIVES: Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are associated with adverse outcomes in pregnancy, including mother-to-child HIV transmission. Yet there are limited data on the prevalence and correlates of STI in pregnant women by HIV status in low- and middle-income countries, where syndromic STI management is routine. METHODS: Between November 2017 and July 2018, we conducted a cross-sectional study of consecutive pregnant women making their first visit to a public sector antenatal clinic (ANC) in Cape Town. We interviewed women ≥18 years and tested them for Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoea (NG) and Trichomonas vaginalis (TV) using Xpert assays (Cepheid, USA); results of syphilis serology came from routine testing records. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify correlates of STI in pregnancy. RESULTS: In 242 women (median age 29 years [IQR = 24-34], median gestation 19 weeks [IQR = 14-24]) 44% were HIV-infected. Almost all reported vaginal sex during pregnancy (93%). Prevalence of any STI was 32%: 39% in HIV-infected women vs. 28% in HIV-uninfected women (p = 0.036). The most common infection was CT (20%) followed by TV (15%), then NG (5.8%). Of the 78 women diagnosed with a STI, 7 (9%) were identified and treated syndromically in ANC. Adjusting for age and gestational age, HIV-infection (aOR = 1.89; 95% CI = 1.02-3.67), being unmarried or not cohabiting with the fetus' father (aOR = 2.19; 95% CI = 1.16-4.12), and having STI symptoms in the past three days (aOR = 6.60; 95% CI = 2.08-20.95) were associated with STI diagnosis. CONCLUSION: We found a high prevalence of treatable STIs in pregnancy among pregnant women, especially in HIV-infected women. Few women were identified and treated in pregnancy.

Acceptability and efficacy of partner notification for curable sexually transmitted infections in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review.

Comprehensive case management of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) includes partner notification. We reviewed the recent literature evaluating the acceptability and efficacy of partner notification strategies (i.e. direct patient referral, provider referral, or expedited partner treatment) for curable STIs in sub-Saharan Africa. We conducted a systematic search following PRISMA guidelines: published January 2008 to June 2017 in the English language, study in sub-Saharan Africa, and discussion of any curable STI with an outcome on partner notification. We searched six electronic databases, conference abstracts, online clinical trial registries, and article bibliographies. The results showed that out of the 74 identified articles, 55 did not meet inclusion criteria. Of the 11 studies evaluating direct patient referral, the proportion of index cases ( n = 4163) who successfully notified sex partner(s) was 53% (range 23-95%). Among those who notified ( n = 1727), 25% (range 0-77%) had partner(s) that sought evaluation (95% CI 0.51-0.54; 95% CI 0.23-0.27). Both provider referral and expedited partner treatment had higher proportions of partner(s) who sought treatment ( n = 208, 69% and n = 44, 84%, respectively). Direct patient referral is the most commonly used and evaluated partner notification strategy for STIs in sub-Saharan Africa with mixed success. We recommend future research to investigate other strategies such as expedited partner treatment.