ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To describe the clinical manifestations of Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) disease during pregnancy and after birth and the therapeutic challenge of treating patients with this condition. METHODS: We describe the clinical manifestations of this disease, as well as the diagnostic tests and treatments performed. RESULTS: The patient was referred for evaluation due to a persistent headache. Examination revealed bilateral anterior uveitis, papillitis and yellowish-white choroidal lesions in both eyes. A tentative diagnosis of VKH disease was made. A multimodal imaging study was performed at the time of presentation and throughout the disease course. The patient was initially treated with intravenous corticosteroids, and subsequently, oral corticosteroids and cyclosporine were administered. Clinical manifestations increased in severity after childbirth. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical course of VKH disease can be modified by pregnancy. While clinical manifestations during gestation may be mild, these may be exacerbated after birth. Treatment with corticosteroids and cyclosporine can be effective.
Subject(s)
Uveomeningoencephalitic Syndrome , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Uveomeningoencephalitic Syndrome/diagnosis , Uveomeningoencephalitic Syndrome/drug therapy , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Disease Progression , Acute Disease , ChoroidABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: We describe the case of a postoperative fungal endophthalmitis caused by Wickerhamomyces anomalus, an opportunistic yeast common in nature but rare as a causative agent in ocular infections. This would be the second reported case of W. anomalus endophthalmitis. CASE REPORT: A patient came to our hospital with a dense hemovitreous caused by an inadvertent ocular perforation and retinal detachment during a cataract surgery. In the days following the first vitreoretinal surgery a chronic postoperative endophthalmitis was evidenced. Only after several surgeries as well as intravitreal antibiotics and sample takings, Wickerhamomyces was detected. The treatment with oral voriconazole and an intraocular lens extraction controlled the infection. DISCUSSION: Wickerhamomyces anomalus, despite not being particularly aggressive in our case, was resistant to various consequent vitreoretinal surgeries. The unresponsiveness to treatment led us to contemplate the fungal etiology, and fortunately the cultures were positive for this yeast. In conjunction to antifungal therapy, it is possible that the IOL explantation played an important role in the treatment. CONCLUSION: A high index of suspicion must be held in cases of fungal endophthalmitis. Both IOL explantation and oral antifungal therapy are useful treatment options in cases of W. anomalus endophthalmitis.
