Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry ; 11(2): 231-8, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12611753

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The authors describe characteristics, treatment, and acute service use associated with agitation and depression in dementia. METHODS: Authors used retrospective chart review of symptoms, physician-level prescribing, and acute service use over 3 months for 2,487 physically frail older residents, including 1,836 with dementia, (mean age: 79.8 years) in 109 long-term care facilities, describing differences between uncomplicated dementia and three mutually exclusive subgroups of complicated dementia, including dementia with agitation-only, dementia with depression-only, and dementia with mixed agitation and depression. RESULTS: Compared with the other subgroups, frail elderly patients with dementia complicated by mixed agitation and depression have the highest rate of hospitalization, the greatest number of medical diagnoses, and the greatest medical severity, and they receive the greatest number of psychiatric medications. Depression in dementia (either alone or mixed with agitation) was associated with greater prevalence of pain. CONCLUSIONS: Dementia complicated by mixed agitation and depression accounts for over one-third of complicated dementia and is associated with multiple psychiatric and medical needs, intensive pharmacological treatment, and use of high-cost services. Research should target this complex, high-risk group to develop appropriate diagnostic criteria and effective treatment interventions.


Subject(s)
Dementia/complications , Depressive Disorder, Major/complications , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Frail Elderly , Nursing Homes , Psychomotor Agitation/complications , Psychomotor Agitation/drug therapy , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Dementia/rehabilitation , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Pain/complications , Pain/epidemiology , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies
3.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 50(11): 1816-25, 2002 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12410900

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe and provide baseline data from The National Pressure Ulcer Long-Term Care Study (NPULS). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of detailed resident characteristics, treatments, and outcomes using convenience sampling. SETTING: One hundred nine long-term care facilities throughout the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Two thousand four hundred twenty adult residents aged 18 and older, with a length of stay of 14 days or longer and who were at risk of developing a pressure ulcer, as defined by a Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk MEASUREMENTS: More than 500 characteristics were obtained for each resident over a 12-week period. This paper describes the NPULS database with respect to the resident (sex, age, diagnoses, severity of illness scores, Braden Scale score, activities of daily living, cognitive ability, mobility, bowel or bladder incontinence, laboratory values, nutritional assessment, and pressure ulcer assessment documentation), treatment (nutritional interventions, pressure relieving devices, incontinence interventions, protective devices, turning schedules, and pressure ulcer treatments), and outcome variables (pressure ulcer development and healing, pressure ulcer and systemic infection, changes in nutritional status, and discharge disposition) associated with pressure ulcers. Descriptive statistics and bivariate associations were used for preliminary analyses of resident, treatment, and outcome characteristics. RESULTS: The average age +/- standard deviation was 79.7 +/- 14.2; 70% of the residents were female. Fifty-three percent of residents (n = 1,293) were at risk of developing a pressure ulcer but never developed one during the study (Group 1), 19% developed a new pressure ulcer during the study (n = 457) (Group 2), 22% had an existing pressure ulcer (n = 534) (Group 3), and 6% had an existing pressure ulcer and developed a new ulcer during the study (n = 136) (Group 4). Residents who developed a new pressure ulcer (Group 2) were more likely to be female, older, cognitively impaired, and immobile than residents who had an existing pressure ulcer (Group 3). CONCLUSIONS: This baseline study describes the NPULS database with respect to the resident, treatment, and outcome variables associated with pressure ulcers. Future studies will focus on multivariate analyses for risk factor prediction of pressure ulcer development and pressure ulcer healing. Research-based pressure ulcer prevention and treatment protocols can then be developed.


Subject(s)
Long-Term Care/statistics & numerical data , Pressure Ulcer/epidemiology , Pressure Ulcer/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Data Collection/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Pressure Ulcer/prevention & control , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , United States/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...