Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Patient Exp ; 5(3): 167-176, 2018 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30214921

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: A risk calculator paired with a personalized decision aid (RC&DA) may foster shared decision-making in primary care. We assessed the feasibility of using an RC&DA with patients in a primary care outpatient clinic and patients' experiences regarding communication and decision-making. METHODS: This pilot study was conducted with 15 patients of 3 primary care physicians at a clinic within a tertiary medical center. An atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk calculator was used to generate a personalized RC&DA that displayed absolute 10-year risk information as an icon array graphic. Patient perceptions of utility of the RC&DA, preferences for decision-making, and uncertainty with risk reduction decisions were measured with a semi-structured interview. RESULTS: Patients reported that the RC&DA was easy to understand and knowledge gained was useful to modify their ASCVD risk. Patients used the RC&DA to make decisions and reported low uncertainty with those decisions. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of, and positive patient experiences related to using, an RC&DA to facilitate shared decision-making between physicians and patients in an outpatient primary care setting.

2.
Chest ; 141(6): 1626-1632, 2012 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22670027

ABSTRACT

In scientific publications, laboratory and clinical images are part of the evidence on which authors base the interpretation and conclusions of their research. However, variability in biology, image acquisition and quality, standards for interpretation, training and experience of evaluators, and presence of artifacts can markedly reduce interrater and intrarater reliability. This variability in interpretation suggests that authors should support their claims with complete information about the image on which those claims are based. Yet, without appropriate guidelines, the documentation of these published images almost certainly will be incomplete and inconsistent. Here, we propose six principles for documenting clinical and laboratory images in publications: the clinical and laboratory images in publications (CLIP) principles. The principles were inspired by the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) and related initiatives that are intended to improve the documentation of research through the use of guidelines. However, the CLIP principles are not formal guidelines, standards, or requirements but, rather, reminders about the information that may be needed to support interpretations and conclusions based on images. These principles organize the self-evident factors related to the nature, acquisition, reporting, and presentation of clinical and laboratory images. As imaging technologies become more complex, however, so too does the specific information needed to document how specific types of images are acquired. Thus, in addition to general direction for all authors, the CLIP principles give journals and professional societies a foundation, a direction, and some models to assist them in developing technology-specific guidelines for reporting the images common in their area of practice.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research , Diagnostic Imaging , Documentation/standards , Publishing/standards , Guidelines as Topic , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
3.
J Heart Lung Transplant ; 29(5): 554-61, 2010 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20044278

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Intracellular Ca(2+) handling is abnormal in human heart failure. Studies have demonstrated that left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support reverses phenotypic alterations, suggesting that, in select patients, LVAD support may be a bridge to recovery. Few studies have related support duration to phenotypic recovery. We hypothesized that reversal of impaired sarcoendoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca(2+) cycling following LVAD implantation is duration-dependent. METHODS: We used post-rest potentiation to assess SR function, and Western blot analysis to measure Ca(2+)-cycling proteins. Left ventricular tissue from 10 non-failing hearts, 8 failing hearts and 10 LVAD-supported hearts was analyzed. Support ranged from 7 to 334 days. The median duration, 115 days, divided patients into short- and long-term support groups. RESULTS: Post-rest potentiation (PRP) response recovered after short-term LVAD support to a level (116.8 +/- 12.1%; n = 5) close to non-failing (123.4 +/- 12.0%; n = 10) hearts, but recovery after long-term support (23.5 +/- 7.0%; n = 5) remained closer to that of failing hearts (13.5 +/- 5.6%). We found a similar pattern of normalization for SR Ca(2+)-ATPase protein and the phospholamban/SR Ca(2+)-ATPase ratio (non-failing: 0.66 +/- 0.11; failing: 1.21 +/- 0.23; short-duration LVAD: 0.68 +/- 0.14; long-duration LVAD: 1.67 +/- 0.30; correlation p < 0.001; r = 0.93). The ratio also tended to correlate with the PRP response after unloading (p = 0.05; r = -0.65). CONCLUSIONS: SR Ca(2+) handling improved during early LVAD support, but long-term support was associated with abnormal Ca(2+) cycling. These findings cast doubt on strategies designed to wean patients after complete unloading with an LVAD.


Subject(s)
Calcium/metabolism , Heart Failure/physiopathology , Heart-Assist Devices , Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Calcium-Transporting ATPases/metabolism , Adult , Aged , Calcium-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Contraction/physiology , Ventricular Function, Left/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...