Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
Neurology ; 56(11 Suppl 4): S52-5, 2001 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11402152

ABSTRACT

As frontotemporal dementia progresses in individuals, safety issues related to behaviors and injury become a paramount concern. In addition to self-care deficits, frontotemporal dementias are often characterized by behavioral manifestations that include aggression and disinhibition. These behaviors may place the patient and caregivers at risk of injury, stress, and social embarrassment, and frequently lead to institutionalization. Additionally, motor disturbances associated with frontotemporal dementias may contribute to risk of injury from falls. The authors present an integrated biopsychosocial model to guide assessment of needs that may be expressed through behavior. Environmental, behavioral, and psychosocial strategies to assist caregivers in preventing and responding to behaviors and risks are discussed, with the goal of promoting maximum function and quality of life and minimizing caregiver strain. The authors discuss the dangers of physical restraints, which are commonly suggested as a response to fall risk and behavioral symptoms without an awareness of research-based data regarding their lack of efficacy. Benefits and risks of a variety of need-based interventions are presented in a practical, clinically relevant manner. The discussion of diverse safety-enhancing interventions is intended to enable clinicians and caregivers to identify individualized care strategies for patients with frontotemporal dementia.


Subject(s)
Behavioral Symptoms/psychology , Dementia/psychology , Environment , Health Personnel/psychology , Restraint, Physical/psychology , Safety , Aggression , Behavior Therapy/methods , Behavioral Symptoms/therapy , Dementia/therapy , Exploratory Behavior , Health Personnel/education , Humans , Inhibition, Psychological , Restraint, Physical/methods
3.
J Gerontol Nurs ; 26(9): 6-13, 2000 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11883616

ABSTRACT

End-of-life decision-making is often a difficult process and one that many elderly patients and their families will undergo. The grounded theory study of nurses, physicians, and family members (n = 20) reported in this article examined provider behaviors that facilitated the process of decision-making near the end of patients' lives. According to participants, providers who are experienced and comfortable are more likely to engage in communication and assessment strategies that facilitate end-of-life decision-making. Communication strategies included: being clear, avoiding euphemisms, spelling out the goals and expectations of treatment, using words such as "death" and "dying," and being specific when using such words as "hope" and "better." Assessment strategies included: assessing patients' physical conditions and end-of-life wishes, patients' and family members' understandings of the disease and prognosis, and their expectations and goals. An important first step for improved care is making explicit the provider's communicating and assessing strategies that facilitate end-of-life decision-making.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Attitude to Health , Communication , Decision Making , Family/psychology , Geriatric Assessment , Geriatric Nursing/methods , Geriatrics/methods , Nursing Assessment/methods , Professional-Patient Relations , Terminal Care/methods , Terminal Care/psychology , Aged , Attitude to Death , Humans , Medical Staff/psychology , Midwestern United States , Nursing Methodology Research , Nursing Staff/psychology , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Professional-Family Relations , Prognosis , Semantics , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
J Gerontol Nurs ; 25(11): 26-34; quiz 52-3, 1999 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10776159

ABSTRACT

Five categories of problems that often result in siderail use: memory disorder, impaired mobility, injury risk, nocturia/incontinence, and sleep disturbance. As nursing homes work toward meeting the Health Care Financing Administration's mandate to examine siderail use, administrators and staff need to implement interventions that support safety and individualize care for residents. While no one intervention represents a singular solution to siderail use, a range of interventions, tailored to individual needs, exist. This article describes the process of selecting individualized interventions to reduce bed-related falls.


Subject(s)
Accidental Falls/prevention & control , Beds , Geriatric Nursing/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Dementia/nursing , Female , Geriatric Assessment , Humans , Nursing Assessment , Nursing Homes , Patient Care Planning , Risk Factors , Risk Management , Stroke/nursing
6.
Geriatr Nurs ; 19(6): 322-30, 1998.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9919117

ABSTRACT

The use of bilateral siderails, similar to physical restraints, can be safely reduced by a comprehensive assessment process. This article presents an individualized assessment for evaluating siderail use to guide nurses in managing resident characteristics for falling out of bed and intervening for high-risk residents. The individualized assessment is consistent with federal resident assessment instrument requirements and includes risk factors specific to falls from bed.


Subject(s)
Accidental Falls/prevention & control , Beds , Nursing Assessment/methods , Activities of Daily Living , Aged , Geriatric Nursing , Humans , Patient Care Planning , Restraint, Physical , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...