Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 11(11): 1053-8, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25086957

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Available data are limited on the level of adherence to established guidelines for appropriate utilization of MR in musculoskeletal imaging. This study estimates the percentage of MRI examinations for knee and shoulder pain or tendonitis performed without prior radiography, which thus may fall outside the ACR Appropriateness Criteria for the Medicare and commercially insured populations. METHODS: The percentage of MRI examinations for knee and shoulder pain or tendonitis performed without prior radiography was estimated among patients in the Medicare 5% carrier claims limited data set and among commercially insured patients in the Truven Marketscan Treatment Pathways database in 2010. RESULTS: Approximately 28% of all knee MRIs, and 35%-37% of all shoulder MRIs were performed without recent prior radiographs. The extrapolated expense of these potentially unwarranted MRIs in the entire fee-for-service Medicare population was between $20 and $35 million. Between 20% and 23% of patients undergoing knee MRI, and 27%-32% undergoing shoulder MRI, did not have radiographic examination at any point before the MRI in the same calendar year. CONCLUSIONS: MRI performed without prior radiography represents a potential gap in care and should be considered as an area for establishment of performance measures.


Subject(s)
Knee , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Shoulder Pain/diagnosis , Tendinopathy/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Medicare , Middle Aged , Radiography , Retrospective Studies , Tendinopathy/diagnostic imaging , United States
2.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 11(5): 456-63, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24793040

ABSTRACT

Performance measures in radiology play an increasingly significant role in health care quality assessment and now form the basis for a variety of pay-for-performance programs, including those administered by CMS. This article introduces the measure development process, beginning with topic selection, followed by measure development and testing, National Quality Forum endorsement, and implementation. Once implemented, measures may undergo further testing and be re-endorsed, modified, or retired. Radiologists should familiarize themselves with the measures relevant to their practice, develop ways to collect and report data efficiently, and implement the necessary practice changes to meet measure criteria and improve the quality of their practice.


Subject(s)
Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Radiology/standards , Evidence-Based Medicine , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Organizational Innovation , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Reimbursement, Incentive , Safety Management , Societies, Medical , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...