Conversations with parents of medically ill children: a study of interactions between medical students and parents and pediatric residents and parents in the clinical setting.

BACKGROUND: The traditional remedies applied by medical schools to the perennial problem of teaching "caring competence" have been unsuccessful. PURPOSE: Our purpose was to design and evaluate a simple and effective method for helping students maintain affective contact with their patients. METHODS: Third-year medical students and pediatric residents were given the opportunity to talk informally with parents of medically ill children and reflect on the value of this experience for their learning. Trainees' opinions of the experience were measured with focus groups and a questionnaire. RESULTS: Trainees were delighted with the experience, particularly with the following aspects: the opportunity to hear a personally relevant story told in a sincere manner, the realization that they could have an authentic interaction "even" in a medical setting, and the usefulness of the information they derived from the conversation. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that something unique to the conversational experience has educational value.

The use of an objective structured clinical examination with postgraduate residents in pediatrics.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness of an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) for assessing and providing feedback to postgraduate residents in pediatrics. DESIGN: A 5-station OSCE given in 1996, based on the educational objectives of a general pediatric training program. Each station assessed the residents' interviewing and history-taking skills with a standardized patient. The results were correlated with those of the in-training evaluation reports. SETTING: The Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-three of 61 pediatric residents: 14 first-year, 12 second-year, 8 third-year, and 9 fourth-year residents. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Scores for each of the 5 stations were broken down into 15 points for the check-list, 5 for the global assessment, and 10 for the written postencounter question, for a total score of 150. The in-training evaluation report ratings were converted to a 5-point numerical scale, ranging from 1 (unsatisfactory) to 5 (outstanding). RESULTS: The mean OSCE score for the 43 pediatric residents was 104.9. Although the residents in their senior year scored higher, there was no statistically significant difference among the 4 years for the total OSCE score or for any of the 5 stations. The fourth-year residents' scores on the postencounter questions were significantly (P < .05) higher than the first-year residents' scores. Two residents scored less than 60%. The internal consistency of the 5-station OSCE was limited (r = 0.69). Residents received verbal feedback at the conclusion of the OSCE, and they received their scores when they were calculated. The mean overall in-training evaluation report score for all 61 pediatric residents was 3.9. There was a moderate, but statistically significant, correlation between the overall mean OSCE results and the overall mean in-training evaluation report scores (r = 0.45). CONCLUSION: The OSCE can provide a useful formative evaluation of postgraduate residents, but the usefulness of the evaluation data and the feedback must be balanced with the logistic difficulties and expense.

Ethics teaching and learning in pediatric training: development of a curriculum.

The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada has stated that residency programs "must provide opportunities for residents to gain an understanding of the basic principles of biomedical ethics as it relates to the specialty." This article presents the steps taken to develop a curriculum for teaching and learning biomedical ethics in Canadian pediatric residency programs, and to provide a model for teaching ethics in this context. Using literature reviews, and opinion surveys of departmental chairpersons, pediatric residents, and practising pediatricians across Canada, we have developed a teachers' handbook to help faculty members in teaching ethics. It can also be used as a tool to enhance faculty development in ethics. The manual is to be distributed to all pediatric training programs throughout Canada in 1997, and its use will be evaluated over the subsequent year. It offers a prototype that is adaptable to Royal College programs other than pediatrics.

Oxybutynin efficacy in the treatment of primary enuresis.

The effectiveness of oxybutynin in the treatment of primary enuresis was evaluated in a double-blind study. A total of 30 children (25 boys, five girls), at least 6 years of age, with primary enuresis and no daytime incontinence or history of other urinary tract problems were selected at random from an enuresis clinic population. The study was explained to the families and they were told how to keep records of nocturnal bed-wetting episodes and side effects. The patients were treated with a 10 mg of oxybutynin at suppertime for 28 days. Before or after the treatment period, all children received an identical placebo for 4 weeks. Two-sided paired t tests were used to compare frequency of nocturnal enuresis. Frequency during the drug regimen did not differ significantly from that during the placebo study. There were no differences in findings between boys and girls or between children who had previously taken imipramine and those who had not. The study showed no evidence that oxybutynin is effective in treating primary enuresis.