Occupational health and psychological wellbeing in first line nurses during health crisis periods: reliability study of the SOIC tool.

Background: In 2020, the emergence of the new Coronavirus has put health professionals under enormous pressure, as they had to work in difficult and often disadvantaged situations. Prevention of symptoms such as stress, anxiety and burnout therefore become important health management goals. Aim: The aim of this pilot cross-sectional study was to assess the reliability and feasibility of a tool on Occupational Health Nurses after a Pandemic Period such as the COVID-19 pandemic (Salute Oc-cupazionale negli Infermieri in Periodo Pandemico Covid19 - SOIC) that aims to assess the occupational health and psychological wellbeing of nurses during periods of health crisis. Methods: This study was conducted from September to November 2022. The SOIC tool is composed by two preliminary sections and a third part including five validated questionnaires (measuring burnout, work engagement, psychological symptoms, resilience, and mindful awareness). An opportunistic sample of 202 nurses working in a Teaching Hospital of Rome and members of NurSind union were invited to participate: of these, 24 nurses completed the SOIC in two subsequent occasions (T1 and T2). Results: The test-retest assessment showed no differences between the two waves (T1 and T2) in terms of median scores for all questionnaires included in the SOIC tool. The Cronbach alphas, considering all items of each questionnaire included in the SOIC tool, showed good or excellent internal consistencies. Conclusion: The test-retest assessments and the reliability analyses encouraged the usability of the SOIC tool. Furthermore, consistent associations between the five questionnaires were obtained.

Does transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length before 14 weeks predict preterm delivery in high-risk pregnancies?

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether high-risk patients manifest cervical length < 25 mm on transvaginal ultrasound before 14 weeks of gestation, and if this finding is predictive of preterm delivery. METHODS: Asymptomatic pregnancies at high risk for preterm birth were followed prospectively from 10 + 0 weeks to 13 + 6 weeks with transvaginal sonographic measurement of the cervix. A cervical length < 25 mm was considered a short cervix at this gestational age and at the follow-up ultrasound examinations, performed between 14 and 24 weeks. The primary outcome was preterm birth at < 35 weeks of gestation. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-three pregnancies met the study criteria and were included in the analysis. Only 10 (5%) patients had a cervix < 25 mm before 14 weeks. The sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values of a short cervix were 14%, 97%, 50%, and 82%, respectively (relative risk, 2.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-5.6). The mean transvaginal sonographic cervical length before 14 weeks of gestation was 33.7 +/- 6.9 mm in pregnancies which delivered preterm (n = 36), and 35.0 +/- 6.8 mm in those delivering at term (n = 147) (P = 0.3). Follow-up transvaginal ultrasound examination of the cervix to 24 weeks revealed that the average gestational age at which a short cervix was detected was 18.7 +/- 2.9 weeks. CONCLUSION: A cervical length < 25 mm on transvaginal sonographic assessment rarely occurs before 14 weeks even in high-risk patients destined to deliver preterm; in these patients cervical changes predictive of preterm birth develop mostly after this gestational age.

Prediction of preterm premature rupture of membranes by transvaginal ultrasound features and risk factors in a high-risk population.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the transvaginal ultrasound features and risk factors that predict preterm delivery (PTD) preceded by either preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) or preterm labor (PTL) in a high-risk population. STUDY DESIGN: Singleton gestations at high-risk for preterm delivery were screened prospectively with transvaginal ultrasound between 14 and 24 weeks. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed for historical obstetric risk factors and transvaginal ultrasound features (cervical length (CL) and cervical funneling (CF)) for the prediction of PTD preceded by PPROM or PTL at < 32 and < 35 weeks' gestation, respectively. Indicated preterm deliveries were excluded. RESULTS: Of 321 patients screened, 71 (22%) delivered at < 35 weeks, 40 (56%) after PPROM and 31 (44%) after PTL. Preterm delivery at < 32 weeks was seen in 47 patients (15%), with 20 (43%) occurring after PTL and 27 (57%) after PPROM. Univariate analysis showed the following to be significant predictors of PPROM at < 35 weeks: a past history of PTD between 25 and 30 weeks (P < 0.008), cerclage in the current pregnancy (P < 0.0001), bacterial vaginosis (P < 0.011), CL < 25 mm (P < 0.0001) and CF > 25% (P < 0.0001). The following were found to be significant predictors of PTL at < 35 weeks: black race (P < 0.02), a cerclage in the current pregnancy (P < 0.01), CL < 25 mm (P < 0.001) and CF > 25% (P < 0.0001). The significant predictors of PPROM at < 32 weeks were cerclage in the current pregnancy (P < 0.006) and CL < 25 mm (P < 0.0001); for PTL at < 32 weeks they were a past history of spontaneous miscarriage between 14 and 24 weeks (P < 0.02), black race (P < 0.021), cerclage in the current pregnancy (P < 0.001) and CL < 25 mm (P < 0.001). Multivariate regression analysis revealed the significant predictors of PPROM at < 35 weeks to be: a history of PTD between 25 and 30 weeks with odds ratio (OR) 4.8 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.9-11.5) and CL < 25 mm with OR 7.9 (95% CI, 3.6-17.5). The significant predictors of PTL at < 35 weeks on multivariate regression were black race with OR 2.2 (95% CI, 1.0-4.8) and unemployment with OR 1.2 (95% CI, 1.0-1.5). For deliveries < 32 weeks, CL < 25 mm (OR, 10.1; 95% CI, 3.2-32) was the only significant predictor of PPROM. Significant predictors of PTL were unemployment (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.7), a history of spontaneous miscarriage between 14 and 24 weeks (OR, 6.2; 95% CI, 1.4-25), black race (OR, 8.6; 95% CI, 1.5-47) and CL < 25 mm (OR, 4.4; 95% CI, 1-19). The sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values of CL < 25 mm for PPROM at < 35 weeks were 73%, 69%, 25% and 95%, respectively; for PTL at < 35 weeks they were 58%, 66%, 15% and 94%; for PPROM at < 32 weeks they were 85%, 68%, 20%, and 98%; for PTL at < 32 weeks they were 70%, 66%, 12% and 97%. CONCLUSION: There are differences in both transvaginal ultrasound findings and risk factors that predict PPROM or PTL. Of the pathways leading to PTD, CL was a more significant predictor of PPROM compared with PTL, while sociodemographic factors were more predictive of PTL.

Patients with a prior failed transvaginal cerclage: a comparison of obstetric outcomes with either transabdominal or transvaginal cerclage.

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to compare the incidence of preterm birth after a prior failed vaginal cerclage in patients who had a subsequent transabdominal or a transvaginal cerclage. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies in women who had undergone (9-14 weeks) either a transabdominal or a transvaginal prophylactic cerclage after >/=1 prior failed transvaginal cerclage. Prior failed transvaginal cerclage was defined as a preterm birth at <33 weeks' gestation in the immediate prior pregnancy despite a transvaginal cerclage. All transabdominal cerclage procedures were performed by a single attending physician (George Davis, DO). Patients with a cervix too short for transvaginal cerclage placement, placenta previa, or major fetal anomalies were excluded. Primary outcome was preterm birth at <35 weeks' gestation. RESULTS: Forty transabdominal and 24 transvaginal cerclage pregnancies were analyzed. These 2 groups were similar in race and payer status but differed in age (34.0 +/- 4.2 vs 31.3 +/- 4.6 years, respectively; P =.01). The transabdominal cerclage group had more prior failed cerclage procedures per patient (1.8 +/- 1.0 vs 1.1 +/- 0.3; P =.02) and more prior 14- to 24-week spontaneous abortions per patient (2.4 +/- 1.3 vs 1.5 +/- 1.0; P =.02) than the transvaginal cerclage group. Preterm delivery at both <35 and <33 weeks' gestation was less common in the transabdominal cerclage group (18% vs 42%, P =.04; 10% vs 38%, P =.01; respectively) than in the transvaginal cerclage group. Gestational age at delivery was 36. 3 +/- 4.1 weeks in the transabdominal cerclage group and 32.8 +/- 8. 6 weeks in the transvaginal cerclage group (P =.03). Preterm premature rupture of membranes also occurred less often in the transabdominal cerclage group than in the transvaginal cerclage group (8% vs 29%, P =.03). CONCLUSION: In patients with a prior failed transvaginal cerclage, transabdominal cerclage is associated with a lower incidence of preterm delivery and preterm premature rupture of membranes in comparison with transvaginal cerclage.