Access to Methotrexate Monitoring in Latin America: A Multicountry Survey of Supportive Care Capacity.

High-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) is used to treat a broad spectrum of cancers. Methotrexate (MTX) monitoring and adequate supportive care are critical for safe drug administration; however, MTX level timing is not always possible in low- and middle-income countries. The aim of this study was to evaluate HDMTX supportive care capacity and MTX monitoring practices in Latin America (LATAM) to identify gaps and opportunities for improvement. A multicenter survey was conducted among LATAM pediatric oncologists. Twenty healthcare providers from 20 institutions answered the online questionnaire. HDMTX was used to treat acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL; 100%), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (84.2%), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (47.4%), osteosarcoma (78.9%), and medulloblastoma (31.6%). Delays in starting HDMTX infusion were related to bed shortages (47.4%) and MTX shortages (21.1%). MTX monitoring was performed at an in-hospital laboratory in 52%, at an external/nearby laboratory in 31.6%, and was not available in 10.5%. Median interval between sampling and obtaining MTX levels was ≤ 2 h in 45% and ≥ 6 h in 30%, related to laboratory location. Sites without access to MTX monitoring reduced the MTX dose for patients with high-risk ALL or did not include MTX in the treatment of patients with osteosarcoma. Respondents reported that implementation of point-of-care testing of MTX levels is feasible. In LATAM, highly variable supportive care capacity may affect the safe administration of MTX doses. Improving accessibility of MTX monitoring and the speed of obtaining results should be prioritized to allow delivery of full doses of MTX required by the current protocols.

Empirical Antitubercular Treatment for Lymphadenopathy: Are We Missing Lymphoma?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the proportion of patients who received empirical treatment with antitubercular therapy (ATT) prior to the diagnosis of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) in the first multicentric, prospective study on HL from India, and to assess its impact on extent of disease at diagnosis and outcomes. METHODS: Children < 18 y with biopsy proven HL were enrolled in InPOG-HL-15-01. Along with other clinical and epidemiological data, history of prior treatment with ATT was documented. All patients received treatment as per a risk-stratified, response-adapted strategy. RESULTS: Out of 396, 115 (29%) children had received ATT prior to establishing a definitive diagnosis of HL. This cohort presented with advanced-stage disease (p = 0.001) and B symptoms (p = 0.001) in a higher proportion of cases. Consequently, those children were more likely to receive 6 rather than 4 cycles of chemotherapy (p = 0.001). They were more likely to have infradiaphragmatic involvement (p = 0.001). Overall survival and event-free survival were not different. CONCLUSION: Empirical treatment with ATT in children presenting with lymphadenopathy continues to be practiced widely in India. The delay in diagnosis may contribute to children presenting with advanced-stage disease warranting more intensive treatment for successful outcomes.

Hodgkin Lymphoma in Children Under 5 Years: Do They Behave Differently?

The median age of presentation for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is lower in developing countries with a higher proportion under 5 years of age possibly attributable to the high prevalence of Epstein-Barr virus-driven disease. It is unclear whether the clinical presentation and outcomes of this cohort are different with concern regarding late effects being most pronounced in this age group. We report the outcome of children under 5 years of age enrolled in the InPOG-HL-15-01, the first multicentric collaborative study for newly diagnosed children and adolescents with HL from India. Thirty-five (9%) of the study population was younger than 5 years with a striking male preponderance of 34:1. They were less likely to have bulky disease, mediastinal or splenic involvement. The outcomes appear to be at least as favorable as in the older patient group. Efforts need to be made to evolve treatment strategies that spare this very young cohort from potential late effects.

Risk based and response adapted radiation therapy for children and adolescents with newly diagnosed advanced stage Hodgkin lymphoma treated with ABVD chemotherapy: a report from the Indian pediatric oncology group study InPOG-HL-15-01.

This multi-centric prospective study (InPOG-HL-15-01) assessed epidemiological, clinical and outcome data of advanced stage Hodgkin Lymphoma (IIB, III and IV) in children and adolescents (N = 262). Chemotherapy regimen was ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) and radiotherapy (RT) was restricted to patients with bulky disease at diagnosis or with suboptimal response at early response assessment (ERA). ERA revealed complete response in 175 (68.1%), partial response in 77 (29.9%), stable disease in 2 (0.8%), and progressive disease in 3 (1.2%) patients. RT was administered to 111 (97 bulky disease, 14 suboptimal response) patients. Five-year event free (EFS) and overall survival for the whole cohort was 81.1% and 90.8% respectively. On multivariate analysis, the only statistically significant predictor of EFS was use of RT (89% versus 74.2%; p-value <0.001). This study reinforces the benefit of consolidative RT in bulky disease and in those with suboptimal response at ERA on an ABVD backbone.

Treating early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma in resource-limited settings: InPOG-HL-15-01 experience.

BACKGROUND: Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) in childhood is an eminently curable disease. Excellent outcomes can be achieved even in resource-limited settings and increasingly, the focus is on limiting long-term toxicity. Contemporary treatment incorporates a risk-stratified, response-adapted approach using multiagent chemotherapy with or without low-dose radiotherapy (RT). Many developing countries continue to use ABVD (adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastin, and dacarbazine)-based regimen owing to limited acute toxicity, cost, and ease of delivery. We report outcomes of children with early-stage HL using limited cycles of ABVD-based treatment in the first prospective multicentric collaborative study from India InPOG-HL-15-01. METHODS: Children <18 years with biopsy-proven HL were enrolled. Patients with stages I and IIA with or without bulky disease were classified as having early-stage disease. Patients were planned to receive four cycles of ABVD subject to satisfactory early response assessment (ERA) scheduled after two cycles of chemotherapy. RT was limited to patients with bulky disease or those with suboptimal ERA. RESULTS: Four hundred ten patients were enrolled over 30 months from 27 centers. One hundred thirty-four were classified as having early-stage disease. Fifty-three (40%) of these had bulky disease. One hundred ten (83%) of this cohort achieved complete or very good partial ERA. Fifty-four (40%) received RT. At a median of 52 months since diagnosis, 5-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) is 94% and 95.5%, respectively. Treatment-related mortality and abandonment were <1%. CONCLUSION: Limited cycles of ABVD with RT to selected patients is a very effective option for patients with early-stage disease in resource-limited settings.

A study analyzing the health-related quality of life of retinoblastoma survivors in India.

Purpose: : Retinoblastoma (RB) is the commonest intraocular tumor in children. Despite high cure rates, data on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of RB survivors are limited. This study aimed to analyze parent's perspective and self-report of HRQoL of RB survivors, using healthy siblings as controls. It also evaluated the impact of socio-economic status (SES), gender, disease laterality, treatment modality, duration since diagnosis, and visual outcomes, on HRQoL. Methods: Ninety-two RB survivors were enrolled in this observational, cross-sectional questionnaire-based study conducted at a tertiary care center. QoL was analyzed in four dimensions: physical, emotional, social, and school, using both self-report (for children >6 years) and parent proxy report (for children 2-18 years) using Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ (PedsQLTM) 4.0 Generic Core Scale. Seventy-seven healthy siblings served as controls. Results: The mean age of both cohorts was 5.7 years. Thirty-six (39%) patients had bilateral RB. Of the 92 survivors, 43 (47%) had undergone enucleation. The HRQoL of RB survivors was significantly lower compared to sibling controls (P < 0.01) in all four domains, the physical domain being most affected followed by social domain. Parents reported an inferior QoL than patient's self-report. Vision <6/18 in the best eye and enucleation had a negative impact on HRQoL whilst gender, disease laterality, duration since diagnosis and SES had no impact. Conclusion: : QoL assessment is often neglected but an important aspect of survivorship. Results of our study will help in formulating awareness of the domains affected and allow timely advocacy of initiatives for addressing each issue individually. Remedial measures aimed at optimizing QoL should be incorporated as part of their rehabilitation.