Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Urologia ; 88(2): 148-152, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33028166

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Renal calculus disease is an age old disease of human being. PCNL (Percutaneous nephrolithotomy) stands as a gold standard treatment for large renal calculus which is traditionally being done in prone position. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of supine PCNL versus prone PCNL comparing intraoperative time, requirement of relook PCNL, post op hemoglobin drop, post operative hospital stay, post operative complication, SFR ( stone free rate). METHODS AND MATERIALS: It is a prospective study done in Urology department in a tertiary care center in Eastern India between October 2017 and October 2018. A total of 84 patients with lower calyceal renal stones underwent PCNL, 42 of them in supine and 42 in prone position. Lower calyceal stone, size measuring 1 to 2 cm were included in the study. RESULTS: The mean intra operative time was 91.76 min in supine group and 85.43 min in prone group with a p value of 0.115. The mean hemoglobin drop was 1.11 g/dl and 1.18 g/dl in supine and prone position, respectively (p value 0.75). The mean post operative hospital stay was 4.1 and 3.86 days in supine and prone group (p value 0.58), respectively. Two patients in each group require relook PCNL. Stone free rate at 1 month was 95.23% and 90.47% (p value 0.9), respectively in case of supine and prone group. CONCLUSION: Supine PCNL is feasible, comparable to prone PCNL in respect to operative parameters with relatively higher stone free rate though statistically insignificant.


Subject(s)
Kidney Calculi/surgery , Kidney Calices , Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous/methods , Patient Positioning/methods , Prone Position , Supine Position , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Tertiary Care Centers
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...