Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Blood Press ; 27(6): 368-375, 2018 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30129785

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the BEAUTY study we investigated whether utilizing non-invasive monitoring of hemodynamic parameters combined with a drug selection algorithm (integrated hemodynamic management-IHM) compared to conventional drug selection may improve home BP in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. METHODS: Uncontrolled (office systolic blood pressure (SBP) > 140 mmHg and ambulatory daytime SBP >135 mmHg while taking ≥2 antihypertensive drugs) essential hypertensive patients were referred to 5 European Hypertension Excellence Centers and, if eligible, were randomized into IHM-guided vs conventional treatment adjustment. Home blood pressure (BP) was taken with 2 repeated readings at 1-2 min intervals in the morning and in the evening (before drug intake and eating) during the week preceding the visit at the outpatient clinic after 5 min rest using a validated semi-automatic oscillometric arm cuff device and with a correct cuff bladder placement. Home blood pressure was measured in a sub-group of patients (n = 84) not significantly different from the other patients. RESULTS: Home SBP changed from 152.1+/-15.8 and 149.8+/-11.8 mmHg to 131.0 +/-11.1 and 139.6+/-12.8 mmHg in IHM group (n = 46) and Control group (n = 38), respectively, showing significantly greater reduction in IHM than in Control group (d= -10.9 mmHg, 95% CI -17.77, -4.02), p = 0.002. The reduction remained significant after multiple adjustments, particularly for baseline home SBP, recruiting center, age, sex and BMI (SBPIHM-Control= -9,63 mmHg, 95% CI -14.28, -5.11) mmHg, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Drug selection algorithm based on non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring induced larger reduction in home BP compared to conventional drug selection in uncontrolled hypertensive patients referred to European Hypertension Excellence Centers. Although the main BEAUTY study was negative, these home BP measurements taken by patients themselves may suggest that the integrated hemodynamic monitoring is useful in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. This finding might depend on specific features of home BP measurements which could make it recommended BP measurement method for drug trials.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/administration & dosage , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory , Blood Pressure , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/physiopathology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Algorithms , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic
2.
J Hypertens ; 33(12): 2534-45, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26485460

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the BEtter control of BP in hypertensive pAtients monitored Using the HOTMAN sYstem study, we investigated whether utilizing noninvasive monitoring of hemodynamic parameters combined with a drug selection algorithm (integrated hemodynamic management - IHM) compared with conventional drug selection may improve uncontrolled hypertension in European Hypertension Excellence centers. METHOD: Uncontrolled (office SBP >140 mmHg and ambulatory daytime SBP >135 mmHg while taking ≥2 antihypertensive drugs) essential hypertensive patients were referred to five European Hypertension Excellence centers and, if eligible, were randomized to IHM-guided (n = 83) vs. conventional (control, n = 84) treatment adjustment in an investigator-initiated multicenter prospective randomized parallel groups controlled study. RESULTS: The average number of antihypertensive drugs increased from 3.1 to 4.1 in both groups and differed only in a rise of the use of diuretics in the IHM groups (from 13 to 31%). Daytime SBP, defined as the primary endpoint, decreased markedly and to the same extent from baseline to 6 months in IHM (-15.8 ±â€Š14.8 mmHg) and control (-15.4 ±â€Š14.5 mmHg) groups (P = 0.87), with a similar behavior of office SBP (no between group differences, P = 0.18). Average number of adverse events was significantly lower in IHM than in controls (P = 0.008) but of the more general type and not necessarily related to drug treatment. CONCLUSION: Thus, noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring associated with a drug selection algorithm induced similar reductions in ambulatory daytime and office SBP compared with conventional drug selection in uncontrolled hypertensive patients referred to European Hypertension Excellence centers.Clinical Trial Registration - URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01482364.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Blood Pressure , Diuretics/therapeutic use , Hypertension/drug therapy , Adult , Antihypertensive Agents/adverse effects , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory , Clinical Decision-Making , Decision Support Techniques , Female , Humans , Hypertension/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...