Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
East Asian Arch Psychiatry ; 21(2): 73-8, 2011 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21838210

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To examine gender differences in mental health and perceived social support, relationship between parents' income and mental health, and differences in mental health across education levels. METHODS: A total of 303 students aged 16 to 26 years were recruited from Selangor, Malaysia. The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support and General Health Questionnaire were used to measure the level of perceived social support and the mental health status. Demographic data, including education level and parents' income, were also obtained. RESULTS: Females perceived significantly higher levels of overall social support than males (t = -2.7; p < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in mental health status between males and females (t = -1.8; p > 0.05), as well as mental health status among different parental income groups (chi2 = 5.0; p > 0.05) and the education levels of the subjects (chi2 = 0.7; p > 0.05). A more favourable mental health status of the subjects was associated with higher parental incomes (r = -0.1; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There were gender differences for perceived social support, but not for mental health status in older adolescents and young adults. There was also a relationship between parental income and an individual's mental health status, but mental health was not related to their education level.


Subject(s)
Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Health/statistics & numerical data , Social Class , Social Perception , Social Support , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Malaysia/epidemiology , Male , Sex Distribution , Socioeconomic Factors , Students/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
3.
Clin Radiol ; 60(11): 1188-94, 2005 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16223615

ABSTRACT

AIM: To evaluate prospectively the pattern, severity and predictive factors of pain after interventional radiological procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients undergoing non-arterial radiological interventional procedures were assessed using a visual-analogue scale (VAS) for pain before and at regular intervals for 24 h after their procedure. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty patients (87 men, mean age 62 years, range 18-92 years) were entered into the study. Significant increases in VAS score occurred 8 h after percutaneous biliary procedures (+47.7 mm, SD 14.9 mm; p=0.001), 6 h after central venous access and gastrostomy insertion (+23.7 mm, SD 19.5 mm; p=0.001 and +28.4 mm, SD 9.7 mm; p=0.007, respectively) and 4h after oesophageal stenting (+27.8 mm, SD 20.2 mm, p=0.001). Non-significant increases in VAS pain score were observed after duodenal and colonic stenting (duodenal: +5.13 mm, SD 7.47 mm; p=0.055, colonic: +23.3 mm, SD 13.10 mm, p=0.250) at a mean of 5h (range 4-6h). Patients reported a significant reduction in pain score for nephrostomy insertion (-28.4mm, SD 7.11 mm, p=0.001). Post-procedural analgesia was required in 99 patients (69.2%), 40 (28.0%) requiring opiates. Maximum post-procedural VAS pain score was significantly higher in patients who had no pre-procedural analgesia (p=0.003). CONCLUSION: Post-procedural pain is common and the pattern and severity of pain between procedures is variable. Pain control after interventional procedures is often inadequate, and improvements in pain management are required.


Subject(s)
Pain/etiology , Radiology, Interventional , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Analgesia/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous/adverse effects , Pain Measurement/methods , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Stents/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...