Assessment of patients with a Chiari malformation type I.

Introduction: The prevalence of Chiari malformation type I (CM-I) has been estimated as up to 1% of the general population. The majority of patients are asymptomatic and usually do not need treatment. Symptomatic patients, and some asymptomatic patients with associated conditions, may benefit from further assessment and treatment. Research question: The aim of this review was to describe the clinical and radiological assessment of patients presenting with a CM-I. Material and methods: A literature search was performed using the PubMed and Embase databases focused on clinical assessment and imaging techniques used to diagnose CM-I. Results: Following a complete clinical evaluation in patients with symptomatic CM-I and/or radiologically significant CM-I (tonsillar impaction, resulting tonsillar asymmetry and loss of CSF spaces), MRI of the brain and whole spine enables an assessment of the CM-I and potential associated or causative conditions. These include hydrocephalus, syringomyelia, spinal dysraphism, and tethered cord. Flow and Cine MRI can provide information on CSF dynamics at the craniocervical junction, and help in surgical decision-making. Hypermobility or instability at the upper cervical and craniocervical junction is less common and can be measured with CT imaging and flexion/extension or upright MRI. Discussion and conclusion: The majority of CM-I detected are incidental findings on MRI imaging of brain or spine, and do not require intervention. Once a radiological diagnosis and concern has been raised, clinical assessment by an appropriate specialist is required. A MRI brain and cervical spine is indicated in all radiologically labelled CM-I. In symptomatic patients or cases of radiologically significant CM-I, MRI of the brain and entire spine is indicated. Further investigations should be tailored to individuals' needs.

Safety analysis and complications of condylar screws in a single-surgeon series of 250 occipitocervical fusions.

OBJECTIVE: Condylar screw fixation is a rescue technique and an alternative to the conventional configuration of occipitocervical fusion. Condylar screws are utilized when previous surgical bone removal along the supraocciput has occurred which makes anchoring of a traditional barplate technically difficult or impossible. However, the challenging dissection of C0-1 necessary for condylar screw fixation and the concerns about possible complications have, thus far, prevented the acquisition of large surgical series utilizing occipital condylar screws. In the largest case series to date, this paper aims to evaluate the safety profile and complications of condylar screw fixation for occipitocervical fusion. METHODS: A retrospective safety and complication-based analysis of occipitocervical fusion via condylar screws fixation was performed. RESULTS: A total of 250 patients underwent occipitocervical fusions using 500 condylar screws between September 2012 and September 2018. No condylar screw pullouts, or vertebral artery impingements were observed in this series. The sacrifice of condylar veins during the dissection at C0-1 did not cause any venous stroke. Hypotrophic condyles were found in 36.4% (91 of the 250) cases and did not prevent the insertion of condylar screws. Two transient hypoglossal deficits occurred at the beginning of this surgical series and were followed by recovery a few months later. Corrective strategies were effective in preventing further hypoglossal injuries. CONCLUSIONS: This surgical series suggests that the use of condylar screws fixation is a relatively safe and reliable option for OC fusion in both adult and pediatric patients. Methodical dissection of anatomical landmarks, intraoperative imaging, and neurophysiologic monitoring allowed the safe execution of the largest series of condylar screws reported to date. Separate contributions will follow in the future to provide details about the long-term clinical outcome of this series.

Posterior fossa decompression with duraplasty in Chiari malformation type 1: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Surgery for symptomatic Chiari type I malformation (CM-I) patients include posterior fossa decompression (PFD) involving craniectomy with or without dural opening, and posterior fossa decompression with duraplasty (PFDD). This review aims to examine the evidence to aid surgical decision-making. METHODS: A medical database search was expanded to include article references to identify all relevant published case series. Animal studies, editorials, letters, and review articles were excluded. A systemic review and meta-analysis were performed to assess clinical and radiological improvement, complications, and reoperation rates. RESULTS: Seventeen articles, containing data on 3618 paediatric and adult participants, met the inclusion criteria. In the group, 5 papers included patients that had the dura left open. PFDD is associated with better clinical outcomes (RR 1.24, 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.44; P = 0.004), but has a higher complication rate (RR 4.51, 95% CI, 2.01 to 10.11; P = 0.0003). In adults, clinical outcomes differences did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.07) but re-operation rates were higher with PFD (RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.86; P = 0.03), whilst in children re-operation rates were no different (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.41 to 2.30; P = 0.94). Patients with a syrinx did better with PFDD (P = 0.02). No significant differences were observed concerning radiological improvement. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of hydrocephalus and craniocervical region instability, PFDD provides better clinical outcomes but with higher risk. The use of PFD may be justified in some cases in children, and in the absence of a syrinx. To help with future outcome assessments in patients with a CM-I, standardization of clinical and radiological grading systems are required. TRIAL REGISTRATION: not required.