Population Pharmacokinetic Model and Dosing Simulation of Meropenem Using Measured Creatinine Clearance for Patients with Sepsis.

PURPOSE: Creatinine clearance (CCr) and pharmacokinetic parameters are markedly affected by pathophysiological changes in patients with sepsis. However, only a few reports have assessed renal function in patients with sepsis using the measured CCr. Furthermore, the administration regimen has not been sufficiently evaluated using a population PK (PPK) model across renal function broad ranges. Therefore, this study was performed to construct a meropenem PPK model for patients with sepsis using the measured CCr and evaluate the optimized meropenem dosing regimen based on the CCr. METHODS: Patients with sepsis who received intravenous meropenem at the Showa University Hospital were enrolled in this prospective observational study. The PPK model was constructed using blood samples and clinical information of patients. The probability of target attainment (PTA) indicates the likelihood of achieving 50% time above the minimum inhibitory concentration (% T > MIC) based on 10,000 virtual patients using Monte Carlo simulations. The PTA for each meropenem regimen was 50% T > MIC based on different renal functions using the Monte Carlo simulation. RESULTS: One hundred samples were collected from 31 patients. The final PPK model incorporating the measured CCr as a covariate in CL displayed the best fit. The recommended dosing regimen to achieve a PTA of 50% T > MIC of 4 mcg/mL was 1 g every 8 hours as a 3-hour prolonged infusion for patients with CCr 85-130 mL/min and 1 g every 8 hours as an 8-hour continuous infusion for patients with CCr ≥ 130 mL/min. CONCLUSIONS: This model precisely predicted meropenem concentrations in patients with sepsis by accurately evaluating renal function using the measured CCr. Extended dosing was demonstrated to be necessary to achieve a PTA of 50% T > MIC for patients with CCr ≥ 85 mL/min. Meropenem effectiveness can be maximized in patients with sepsis by selecting the appropriate dosing regimen based on renal function and the MIC.

The exploration of population pharmacokinetic model for meropenem in augmented renal clearance and investigation of optimum setting of dose.

In recent years, augmented renal clearance (ARC), in which renal function is excessively enhanced, has been reported, and its influence on ß-lactam antibiotics has been investigated. In this study, we aimed to determine the optimum population pharmacokinetic model of meropenem in patients with sepsis with ARC, and evaluated dosing regimens based on renal function. Seventeen subjects (6 with ARC and 11 without) were enrolled in this study. Predicted meropenem concentrations were evaluated for bias and precision using the Bland-Altman method. To examine the dosing regimen, Monte Carlo simulation was performed to calculate the cumulative fraction of response (CFR). In patients with ARC, the bias (average of the predicted value and measured value residuals) of models constructed by Crandon et al. (2011), Roberts et al. (2009), and Jaruratanasirikul et al. (2015) were 5.96 µg/mL, 10.91 µg/mL, and 4.41 µg/mL, respectively. Following 2 g meropenem every 8 h (180 min infusion), CFR ≥ 90%, a criterion of success for empirical therapy, was achieved, even with creatinine clearance of 130-250 mL/min. For patients with sepsis and ARC, the model of Jaruratanasirikul et al. showed the highest degree of accuracy and precision and confirmed the efficacy of the meropenem dosing regimen in this patient population.

[Case of continuous trans-arterial calcium gluconate infusion using a direct arterial sphygmomanometry line that exhibited dramatic improvement of chemical burns on the fingers caused by hydrofluoric acid].

Hydrofluoric acid (HFA) is commonly used and many injuries occur on the upper extremities following exposure to HFA. The use of calcium gluconate (CG) -containing gel or local injections of CG are widely used for the initial treatment of HFA exposure. However, severe pain continues in some cases despite the treatment. There was a report that trans-arterial CG infusion could improve HFA burns, however, such treatment is not an established clinical procedure. A 30-year-old male presented at our hospital with severe pain in his left thumb. He had been cleaning tiles with an HFA-containing detergent. We diagnosed him with a chemical burn due to HFA exposure. Local CG injections were tried several times, but his terrible pain continued. Therefore, a direct arterial sphygmomanometry line was inserted from the left radial artery, and continuous transarterial CG injection was performed. His terrible pain dramatically improved. Direct arterial sphygmomanometry systems are widely used in the critical care field to monitor the hemodynamics and ICU staffs are used to dealing with it. Moreover, continuous saline infusion prevents the tube obstruction. Continuous CG infusion from a direct arterial sphygmomanometry line is simple and safe way to administer CG in HFA burns.