Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Occup Med (Lond) ; 62(4): 273-80, 2012 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22661664

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: After an episode of non-specific low back pain (LBP) some individuals fail to return to work. The factors leading to such LBP-related sickness absence are not yet fully understood. AIMS: To identify individual resources, over and above the already established predictors, for preventing LBP-related sickness absence in a population-based sample of workers experiencing an episode of LBP. METHODS: Cohort study with 1-year follow-up. Participants were from a working population who reported an episode of acute or subacute LBP at baseline. Four potential resources-life satisfaction, doing sports, job satisfaction and social support at work-were examined for their incremental value in predicting sickness absence over and above baseline sickness absence and fear-avoidance beliefs about work. RESULTS: In all, 279 workers participated in the study. All four resources showed an inverse relationship with regard to sickness absence. A multiple regression analysis revealed that life satisfaction as a resource protected against sickness absence, when controlling for established risk factors. Job satisfaction and social support at work minimized the influence of sickness absence at baseline and at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In a non-clinical working sample of individuals experiencing an acute/subacute episode of LBP, life satisfaction was a unique predictor of sickness absence after 1 year. Prevention in the occupational setting should not only address common risk factors but also occupational and individual resources that keep workers satisfied with life despite having LBP.


Subject(s)
Absenteeism , Low Back Pain/psychology , Sick Leave , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Job Satisfaction , Life Style , Low Back Pain/prevention & control , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Quality of Life/psychology , Regression Analysis , Risk Factors , Social Support , Switzerland , Young Adult
2.
J Int Med Res ; 40(2): 726-33, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22613436

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Clinical study results might be substantially biased by the effects of ageing, resulting in considerable underestimation of treatment efficacy, especially when assessing activities of daily living (ADL) in elderly people. This study aimed to define age- and comorbidity-related normative values in ADL. METHODS: In cross-sectional sampling, 23 763 German-speaking Swiss individuals were contacted. Valid questionnaires from 16 191 (68%) eligible individuals ≥ 18 years of age were included in the study. Age-related ADL reference values were calculated using questionnaire data. RESULTS: The sample was representative of the German-speaking Swiss population as determined by 2003 census data. Age- and pain-related ADL reference values were plotted and confirmed that disability increased with increasing age. CONCLUSIONS: The use of ADL scales that provide age- and comorbidity-related reference values for outcome studies or studies focusing on the elderly is recommended in order to reduce the effect of bias.


Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living , Aging , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bias , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reference Values , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
3.
Int Orthop ; 33(2): 301-13, 2009 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19130056

ABSTRACT

Low back pain (LBP) is currently the most prevalent and costly musculoskeletal problem in modern societies. Screening instruments for the identification of prognostic factors in LBP may help to identify patients with an unfavourable outcome. In this systematic review screening instruments published between 1970 and 2007 were identified by a literature search. Nine different instruments were analysed and their different items grouped into ten structures. Finally, the predictive effectiveness of these structures was examined for the dependent variables including "work status", "functional limitation", and "pain". The strongest predictors for "work status" were psychosocial and occupational structures, whereas for "functional limitation" and "pain" psychological structures were dominating. Psychological and occupational factors show a high reliability for the prognosis of patients with LBP. Screening instruments for the identification of prognostic factors in patients with LBP should include these factors as a minimum core set.


Subject(s)
Disability Evaluation , Low Back Pain/diagnosis , Low Back Pain/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Work Capacity Evaluation , Acute Disease , Chronic Disease , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Low Back Pain/epidemiology , Male , Mass Screening/methods , Pain Measurement , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Psychology , Risk Factors , Sensitivity and Specificity , Severity of Illness Index , Sick Leave/statistics & numerical data , Sickness Impact Profile
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...