Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Psychol Health Med ; 23(10): 1196-1210, 2018 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29792065

ABSTRACT

In a three-wave questionnaire study of 405 working participants, who were initially free of low back pain (LBP) and emotional exhaustion, sleep problems were evaluated as a potential risk factor for the development of LBP and burnout up to three years later. Prospective risk paths were compared between the sexes and between two age-groups (18 to 45 years and older than 45 years). A longitudinal structural equation model showed a good fit with empirical data (RMSEA = .04, SRMR = .06, CFI = .97). Prospective risk paths between the latent constructs showed sleep problems to significantly predict self-reported LBP (ß = .15, p = .011) and burnout (ß = .24, p < .001) two years later. Sleep problems also predicted the occurrence of burnout three years later (ß = .18, p = .002). Sleep-related risk of burnout after two years was greater in older than younger participants (ßolder = .42 vs. ßyounger = .13, p < .001). Sleep problems seem to precede LBP and burnout in working individuals. Health promotion initiatives should use sleep quality as an important early risk indicator, and interventions should focus on promoting better quality sleep, in an attempt to reduce the incidence of LBP and burnout.


Subject(s)
Burnout, Professional/epidemiology , Low Back Pain/epidemiology , Sleep Wake Disorders/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Burnout, Professional/psychology , Emotions , Female , Humans , Incidence , Longitudinal Studies , Low Back Pain/psychology , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Self Report , Sleep , Sleep Wake Disorders/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
2.
Psychol Health Med ; 20(7): 767-80, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25726859

ABSTRACT

This cross-lagged-panel study tested the validity of the German version of the back beliefs questionnaire (BBQ) in predicting pain in the shoulders, neck, and back. A random sample of 2860 individuals participated at baseline, and 73% responded at one-year follow-up. Structural equation modeling was used to carry out a model comparison to evaluate whether paths differed between individuals with and without initial back pain and between those who exercised at baseline and those who did not. Factor analysis showed eight of the nine original items loaded on the expected common factor. High BBQ scores at baseline significantly predicted an increase in shoulder, neck, and back pain in individuals with current back pain (ß = .11, p < .05), but not in other respondents (ß = .02, p = .259). Similarly, baseline BBQ scores predicted the increase in shoulder, neck, and back pain among those who did not exercise (ß = .15, p < .05), but not in those who did (ß = .04, ns). The risk of negative back beliefs preceding an increase in shoulder, neck, and back pain was greatest for those with current back pain who did not exercise (ß = .29, p < .05). The findings confirmed the validity of the German BBQ. Cognitive behavioral interventions should address pessimistic back beliefs in high-risk groups.


Subject(s)
Back Pain , Exercise , Neck Pain , Pessimism , Shoulder Pain , Adult , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Germany , Humans , Language , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Sampling Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Translations
3.
Eur J Health Econ ; 12(5): 455-67, 2011 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20526649

ABSTRACT

Low back pain (LBP) is the most prevalent health problem in Switzerland and a leading cause of reduced work performance and disability. This study estimated the total cost of LBP in Switzerland in 2005 from a societal perspective using a bottom-up prevalence-based cost-of-illness approach. The study considers more cost categories than are typically investigated and includes the costs associated with a multitude of LBP sufferers who are not under medical care. The findings are based on a questionnaire completed by a sample of 2,507 German-speaking respondents, of whom 1,253 suffered from LBP in the last 4 weeks; 346 of them were receiving medical treatment for their LBP. Direct costs of LBP were estimated at 2.6 billion and direct medical costs at 6.1% of the total healthcare expenditure in Switzerland. Productivity losses were estimated at 4.1 billion with the human capital approach and 2.2 billion with the friction cost approach. Presenteeism was the single most prominent cost category. The total economic burden of LBP to Swiss society was between 1.6 and 2.3% of GDP.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Low Back Pain/economics , Absenteeism , Adult , Costs and Cost Analysis , Female , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Low Back Pain/physiopathology , Low Back Pain/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , Switzerland , Young Adult
4.
Pain ; 136(1-2): 62-74, 2008 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17707588

ABSTRACT

The objectives of this study were to develop and validate a tool for assessing pain in population-based observational studies and to develop three subscales for back/neck, upper extremity and lower extremity pain. Based on a literature review, items were extracted from validated questionnaires and reviewed by an expert panel. The initial questionnaire consisted of a pain manikin and 34 items relating to (i) intensity of pain in different body regions (7 items), (ii) pain during activities of daily living (18 items) and (iii) various pain modalities (9 items). Psychometric validation of the initial questionnaire was performed in a random sample of the German-speaking Swiss population. Analyses included tests for reliability, correlation analysis, principal components factor analysis, tests for internal consistency and validity. Overall, 16,634 of 23,763 eligible individuals participated (70%). Test-retest reliability coefficients ranged from 0.32 to 0.97, but only three coefficients were below 0.60. Subscales were constructed combining four items for each of the subscales. Item-total coefficients ranged from 0.76 to 0.86 and Cronbach's alpha were 0.75 or higher for all subscales. Correlation coefficients between subscales and three validated instruments (WOMAC, SPADI and Oswestry) ranged from 0.62 to 0.79. The final Pain Standard Evaluation Questionnaire (SEQ Pain) included 28 items and the pain manikin and accounted for the multidimensionality of pain by assessing pain location and intensity, pain during activity, triggers and time of onset of pain and frequency of pain medication. It was found to be reliable and valid for the assessment of pain in population-based observational studies.


Subject(s)
Pain Measurement/methods , Pain Measurement/standards , Pain/diagnosis , Population Groups , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain/epidemiology , Pain/psychology , Pain Measurement/psychology , Population Groups/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL