Pre-operative stenting is associated with a higher prevalence of post-operative complications following pancreatoduodenectomy.

OBJECTIVES: Whilst there are theoretical benefits from pre-operatively draining the biliary tree prior to pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), the current literature does not support this intervention. The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between pre-operative stenting, bactibilia and outcome in a large United Kingdom tertiary referral practice. METHODS: Patients undergoing PD were identified from a prospectively maintained database. The presence or absence of a stent prior to PD, and the results of bile cultures taken at PD were related to the subsequent post-operative course and the development of complications. RESULTS: 280 patients underwent PD for periampullary malignancies, all of whom presented with jaundice. 118 patients were stented prior to referral (98 ERCP, 20 PTC). Bile cultures were positive more frequently in the stent group (83% vs. 55%; p = 0.000002) and bactibilia was more common after ERCP than PTC (83% vs. 56%; p = 0.006). The overall prevalence of complications was 54% in the stented and 41% in the non-stented group (p = 0.03) with statistical significance achieved for pancreatic leak (p = 0.013) and haemorrhagic complications (p = 0.03). Comparing stent with no stent, there as no difference in the 30-day mortalities (8.5% vs. 6.8%; p = 0.6) or the 1-year mortality rates (35% vs. 28%; p = 0.21). Mortality rates in the infection versus no infection groups were comparable at 30 days (8.5% vs. 5.5%; p = 0.21), and at 1 year (30.7% vs. 26.4%; p = 0.25). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-operative stent insertion prior to PD is associated with increased morbidity but not mortality and this is greatest for stents placed at ERCP.

Application of Portsmouth modification of physiological and operative severity scoring system for enumeration of morbidity and mortality (P-POSSUM) in pancreatic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is associated with high incidence of morbidity and mortality. We have applied P-POSSUM in predicting the incidence of outcome after PD to identify those who are at the highest risk of developing complications. METHOD: A prospective database of 241 consecutive patients who had PD from January 2002 to September 2005 was retrospectively updated and analysed. P-POSSUM score was calculated for each patient and correlated with observed morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: 30 days mortality was 7.8% and morbidity was 44.8%. Mean physiological score was 16.07 +/- 3.30. Mean operative score was 13.67 +/- 3.42. Mean operative score rose to 20.28 +/- 2.52 for the complex major operation (p < 0.001) with 2 fold increase in morbidity and 3.5 fold increase in mortality. For groups of patients with a physiological score of (less than or equal to) 18, the O:P (observed to Predicted) morbidity ratio was 1.3-1.4 and, with a physiological score of >18, the O:P ratio was nearer to 1. Physiological score and white cell count were significant in a multivariate model. CONCLUSION: P-POSSUM underestimated the mortality rate. While P-POSSUM analysis gave a truer prediction of morbidity, underestimation of morbidity and potential for systematic inaccuracy in prediction of complications at lower risk levels is a significant issue for pancreatic surgery.

The impact of splenectomy on outcomes after distal and total pancreatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Several authors advocate spleen preserving distal pancreatectomy, because of the increased complication rate after splenectomy. METHODS: Postoperative complications and survival after distal and total pancreatectomy, were recorded and retrospectively analyzed according to spleen preservation. Patients, who underwent distal and total pancreatectomy without histologically proven adenocarcinoma, or extrapancreatic disease, were included in the cohort which was divided into splenectomy and no splenectomy groups. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher's test. RESULTS: The study group consisted of 62 patients who underwent distal and total pancreatectomy between 26/11/1987 to 6/1/2006. Splenectomy was performed in 35 out of 62 patients (56.5%), distal pancreatectomy was performed in 49 out of 62 patients (79%). Morbidity rate was 28.6% in splenectomy group and 14.8% in the no splenectomy group (p = 0.235), while 30 days mortality rate was 2.9%; one patient died in the splenectomy group (p = 1). CONCLUSION: Spleen-preservation did not influence the outcomes after distal and total pancreatectomy in our series.

Outcomes after identical and compatible orthotopic liver transplantation for fulminant hepatic failure: a single center experience in UK.

To analyze the outcomes between identical and compatible liver transplantation (OLT) for fulminant hepatic failure (FHF) from September 1984 to November 2005. The patients were divided in three groups; group 1 (identical), group 2 (compatible) and group 3 (incompatible), according to the donor-recipient blood type matching. We analyzed several outcomes regarding mortality, patient and graft survival, incidence of acute graft rejection during the first postoperative month (30 days), incidence of biliary complications and indications of re-transplantation. We also analyzed the relationship of Coomb's positive test with postoperative hemolysis to all the above mentioned factors. During the study period, 168 males and 112 females underwent their first OLT for FHF, with 37.1% overall mortality and 42.1% overall graft failure rate. The results between group 1 (203 patients) and group 2 (73 patients) were comparable. A statistically significant difference was recorded in 1 year and overall graft survival between group 1 and group 2 (P = 0.049 and log-rank = 0.035 respectively). Coomb's positive test did not influence the outcomes. OLT in FHF can be safely carried out whether the donor organs are identical or compatible. Hemolysis (Coomb's positive test) after identical or compatible OLT does not influence the outcomes.