Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Chest ; 120(2): 521-7, 2001 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11502653

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the predictive accuracy as well as the rates of false-positive and false-negative results of CT and positron emission tomography (PET)-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) imaging in detecting the metastatic intrathoracic lymph nodes in patients with suspected or proven non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Our other objective was to determine the need for routine invasive sampling procedure in confirming PET/CT staging results. METHODS: The results of CT and PET-FDG scanning in 77 patients with suspected or proven NSCLC were correlated with the histologic findings of hilar/mediastinal lymph node sampling using mediastinoscopy, open biopsy, thoracotomy, or thoracotomy with resection. Patients were then classified into resectable and unresectable groups based initially on PET results and compared to histologic findings. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CT and PET for detecting metastatic lymphadenopathy were 68%, 61%, 63%, and 87%, 91%, and 82%, respectively. A change of management with routine sampling following PET was seen in five of six patients (83%) with false-positive findings (13%) but in none of four patients (9%) with false-negative findings. CONCLUSION: The false-positive findings of PET-FDG imaging affected selection of treatment in 83% of patients. However, false-negative results did not change management in any patient. This could potentially prevent unnecessary invasive thoracotomy, mediastinoscopy, or other sampling procedures in patients with negative PET results.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 , Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology , Neoplasm Staging/methods , Tomography, Emission-Computed , False Negative Reactions , False Positive Reactions , Humans , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Male , Mediastinum , Middle Aged , Sensitivity and Specificity
2.
Clin Lung Cancer ; 3(1): 59-64, 2001 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14656394

ABSTRACT

This study was designed to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive accuracy of PET-FDG imaging in detecting metastatic disease involvement of adrenal glands in patients with lung cancer. We wanted to compare efficacy of positron emission tomography (PET)-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) imaging to computed tomography (CT) scanning in differentiating benign from malignant involvement of adrenal glands in patients with lung cancer. Thirty patients with biopsy-proven lung cancer and abnormal findings on PET and/or CT scanning were studied for presence of adrenal abnormality suggestive of metastatic disease involvement (n = 26) or benign adrenal enlargement (n = 4). The results of PET and CT scanning were compared to histological findings and/or clinical follow-up for at least 1 year for presence or absence of adrenal metastases. PET-FDG imaging correctly detected the presence of metastatic involvement in 17 of 18 patients and excluded metastatic involvement in 11 of 12 patients for sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 94.4%, 91.6%, and 93.3%, respectively. CT scanning showed enlarged adrenals without metastases in 8 of 30 patients and normal-sized adrenals in the presence of metastases in 5 of 30 patients. There was a false-positive PET finding in 1 patient and a false-negative PET finding in another patient. PET-FDG imaging is a highly sensitive, specific, and accurate test to differentiate benign from malignant involvement of adrenal glands in patients with lung cancer and often ambiguous findings on CT scanning.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...