Salvage Therapy in Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: Current Practice and a Look to the Future.

The risk of urgent bowel resection increases significantly among patients hospitalized with acute severe ulcerative colitis. In-hospital management requires quick diagnostic, therapeutic, and decision-making, combined with a multi-disciplinary approach and accessibility to multiple therapeutic options. However, the optimal strategy is still debatable. We performed a review of the current options for salvage therapy as well as novel therapy options emerging. We reviewed studies reporting outcomes of hospitalized steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis treated with salvage therapy (calcineurin inhibitors, infliximab) as well as studies using novel biologic, small molecules, antibiotics, and artificial intelligence to optimize therapy. We collected statistical data about patient factors that impact clinical management and how these can be applied to the real-life practice in order to prescribe a more personalized medicine. Several new drugs and approaches have shown benefits during the last decades for the management of acute severe ulcerative colitis. This effort is driven by the necessity of more effective, safe, and rapidly active therapeutic options with better convenient routes of administration, in order to improve therapeutic outcomes and quality of life for patients. The next step will be tailored medicine according to patients' profiles, taking into account disease characteristics, laboratory parameters, and patients' preferences.

Real-world experience with Curcumin-QingDai combination for patients with active ulcerative colitis: A retrospective multicentre cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Curcumin and QingDai (QD, Indigo) have been shown to be effective for treating active ulcerative colitis (UC). AIM: To evaluate the real-world experience with the Curcumin-QingDai (CurQD) herbal combination to induce remission in active UC. METHODS: A retrospec-tive multicentre adult cohort study from five tertiary academic centres (2018-2022). Active UC was defined as a Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI) ≥ 3. Patients were induced by CurQD. The primary outcome was clinical remission at weeks 8-12, defined as SCCAI ≤2 and a decrease ≥3 points from baseline. Secondary outcomes were clinical response (SCCAI decrease ≥3 points), corticosteroid-free remission, faecal calprotectin (FC) response (reduction ≥50%), FC normalisation (FC ≤100 µg/g for patients with FC ≥300 µg/g at baseline), and safety. All outcomes were analysed for patients who were maintaining stable treatment. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients were included; 50% were biologics/small molecules experienced, and 36.5% received ≥2 biologics/small molecules. Clinical remission was achieved in 41 (46.5%), and clinical response in 53 (60.2%). Median SCCAI decreased from 7 (IQR:5-9) to 2 (IQR:1-3); p < 0.0001. Of the 26 patients on corticosteroids at baseline, seven achieved corticosteroid-free remission. Among 43 biologics/small molecules experienced patients, clinical remission was achieved in 39.5% and clinical response in 58.1%. FC normalisation and response were achieved in 17/29 and 27/33, respectively. Median FC decreased from 1000 µg/g (IQR:392-2772) at baseline to 75 µg/g (IQR:12-136) at the end of inductions (n = 30 patients with paired samples); p < 0.0001. No overt safety signals emerged. CONCLUSION: In this real-world cohort, CurQD effectively induced clinical and biomarker remission in patients with active UC, including patients who were biologics/small molecules experienced.