Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Acad Emerg Med ; 6(9): 911-5, 1999 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10490253

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of occult valvular pathology in afebrile injection drug users (IDUs) compared with an afebrile, non-IDU population. To characterize the type of valvular pathology present in light of current recommendations regarding periprocedural antibiotic prophylaxis against endocarditis. METHODS: This was a comparative, cross-sectional study involving a convenience sample of 98 patients with a history of injection drug use, and 99 non-IDU patients presenting to a large urban ED. Patients were excluded if they had one or more of the following: a history of cardiac valve abnormality, a history of endocarditis, fever on presentation, or a cardiac murmur. Data were collected that included demographics, medical history, and details of injection drug use. Transthoracic echocardiography (echo) was performed on each subject in the ED, and read in a blinded fashion by a single board-certified cardiologist. RESULTS: Among 98 IDUs and 99 non-IDUs, 12% of the IDUs had aortic valve thickening, compared with 5.1% of the non-IDUs (99% CI for difference of 7.8% = -3.0% to 18.6%). Forty-four percent of the IDUs had mitral valve thickening, compared with 25% of the non-IDUs (99% CI for difference of 18.3% = 0.9% to 35.7%). Eleven percent of the IDUs vs 1% of the non-IDUs had tricuspid valve thickening (99% CI for difference of 10.4% = 1.6% to 19.2%). No patient had pulmonic valve thickening. Six percent of the IDUs vs 0% of the non-IDUs had mitral annulus thickening (99% CI for difference of 6.3% = -0.1% to 12.8%). Twelve percent of the IDUs vs 3% of the non-IDUs had mitral chordae thickening (99% CI for difference of 9.5% = -0.4% to 19.4%). Tricuspid chordae thickening was recorded in 2% of the IDUs vs 0% of the non-IDUs (99% CI for difference of 2.1% = -1.7% to 6.0%). Most important, the prevalence of valvular regurgitation was small, and evenly distributed in the two groups. No valvular vegetations were seen. CONCLUSION: Both non-IDUs and IDUs have occult valvular pathology. There is an increased prevalence in IDUs of tricuspid and mitral valve thickening. The prevalence of valvular regurgitation, a reported indication for periprocedural antibiotic prophylaxis, was small and the affected valves were not statistically different between the two groups. These findings question the selected routine use of antibiotic prophylaxis in IDU patients undergoing invasive procedures.


Subject(s)
Heart Valve Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Heart Valve Diseases/epidemiology , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/epidemiology , Adult , Aortic Valve/ultrastructure , Body Temperature , Case-Control Studies , Comorbidity , Confidence Intervals , Cross-Sectional Studies , Echocardiography, Doppler , Female , Heart Valves , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mitral Valve/ultrastructure , Prevalence , Pulmonary Valve/ultrastructure , Reference Values , Risk Factors , Tricuspid Valve/ultrastructure
2.
Prehosp Disaster Med ; 8(1): 51-4; discussion 55, 1993.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10155454

ABSTRACT

Without a well-functioning, prehospital, do-not-resuscitate (DNR) system in place, emergency medical service (EMS) providers must resuscitate all patients who access the system, regardless of the patients' wishes and regardless of what makes ethical or economic sense. In lieu of valid documentation, it is not appropriate to withhold resuscitative measures in this critical, time-dependent situation. In order to help EMS systems implement functional prehospital DNR protocols, this paper reviews the state-of-the-art of prehospital DNR including the issues to consider when designing such a system and a discussion of the features of some of the existing systems. This review includes: 1) the basis and requirements of a DNR system; 2) legal and physical forms for DNR orders; 3) eligibility for DNR status; 4) reversal of DNR orders; and 5) inappropriate use of EMS systems for DNR patients. Finally, a more general discussion of overall resource utilization in prehospital resuscitations is presented to emphasize that implementing prehospital DNR systems is only one piece of a larger issue.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medical Services/organization & administration , Resuscitation Orders , Advance Directives , Eligibility Determination , Forms and Records Control , Health Care Rationing , Humans , Resuscitation Orders/legislation & jurisprudence , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...