Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Development ; 133(2): 343-50, 2006 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16368931

ABSTRACT

In contrast to the somatic cell cycle, duplication of the centrioles does not occur in the second meiotic cycle. Previous studies have revealed that in starfish each of the two centrosomes in fully-grown immature oocytes consists of two centrioles with different destinies: one survives and retains its reproductive capacity, and the other is lost after completion of meiosis. In this study, we investigated whether this heterogeneity of the meiotic centrioles is already determined before the re-initiation of meiosis. We prepared a small fragment of immature oocyte containing the four centrioles and fused it electrically with a mature egg in order to transfer two sets of the premeiotic centrioles into the mature cytoplasm. Two asters were present in this conjugate, and in each of them only a single centriole was detected by electron microscopy. In the first mitosis of the conjugate artificially activated without sperm, two division poles formed, each of which doubled in each subsequent round of mitosis. These results indicate that only two of the four premeiotic centrioles survived in the mature cytoplasm and that they retained their reproductive capacity, which suggests that the heterogeneity of the maternal centrioles is determined well before re-initiation of meiosis, and that some factor in the mature cytoplasm is responsible for suppressing the reproductive capacity of the centrioles destined to decay.


Subject(s)
Asterina/growth & development , Asterina/ultrastructure , Centrosome/ultrastructure , Oocytes/growth & development , Oocytes/ultrastructure , Animals , Cell Fusion , Centrioles/ultrastructure , Electric Stimulation , Female , Ionophores , Meiosis , Microscopy, Electron , Parthenogenesis
2.
Dev Biol ; 266(1): 190-200, 2004 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14729488

ABSTRACT

In most animals, fertilized eggs inherit one centrosome from a meiosis-II spindle of oocytes and another centrosome from the sperm. However, since first proposed by Boveri [Sitzungsber. Ges. Morph. Phys. Münch. 3 (1887) 151-164] at the turn of the last century, it has been believed that only the paternal (sperm) centrosome provides the division poles for mitosis in animal zygotes. This uniparental (paternal) inheritance of centrosomes is logically based on the premise that the maternal (egg) centrosome is lost before the onset of the first mitosis. For the processes of the selective loss of the maternal centrosome, three models have been proposed: One stresses the intrinsic factors within the centrosome itself; the other two emphasize external factors such as cytoplasmic conditions or the sperm centrosome. In the present study, we have examined the validity of one of the models in which the sperm centrosome overwhelms the maternal centrosomes. Because centrosomes cast off into both the first and the second polar bodies (PB) are known to retain the capacity for reproduction and cell-division pole formation, we observed the behavior of those PB centrosomes with reproductive capacity and the sperm centrosome in the same zygotic cytoplasm. We prepared two kinds of fertilized eggs that contain reproductive maternal centrosomes, (1) by micromanipulative transplantation of the PB centrosomes into fertilized eggs, and (2) by suppression of the PB extrusions of fertilized eggs with cytochalasin B. In both types of eggs, the PB centrosomes could double and form cell-division poles, indicating that they are not suppressed by the sperm centrosome, which in turn indicates that selective loss of the maternal centrosome is due to intrinsic factors within the centrosomes themselves.


Subject(s)
Centrosome , Genomic Imprinting , Starfish/genetics , Animals , Fertilization , Fluorescent Antibody Technique , Male , Starfish/embryology , Starfish/physiology
3.
Biol Bull ; 202(3): 213-22, 2002 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12086992

ABSTRACT

In the eggs of a wide range of animal species, various factors that determine the blastomeres' presumptive fate are known to locate unevenly within the egg. In the embryos of these animals, cleavage occurs not just to increase cell numbers, but also to distribute the factors to the respective blastomeres, resulting in cell specialization at the later stages. In the early cleavage stages, before the establishment of a device such as desmosomes to directly join the blastomeres, some other means is needed to keep the blastomeres together and maintain the relative positions among them. In this study, we found that the embryos of the starfish Astropecten scoparius lack the hyaline layer seen in sea urchin embryos and that blastomeres adhere to the fertilization envelope (FE) via filamentous cellular projections (fixing processes). Electron microscopy revealed the fixing processes to be specialized microvilli formed, after the elevation of the FE, by the elongation of short microvilli that pre-exist in unfertilized eggs. After the first cleavage, the two blastomeres separate from each other and finally attach to the FE. In the subsequent cleavages, the blastomeres undergo repeated cell division without separating from the FE. Between the blastomeres and the FE, only shortened fixing processes were observed. Destruction of the fixing processes caused release of the blastomeres from the FE and disturbance of the relative positions of the blastomeres, resulting in abnormal development of the embryos. These observations suggest that the fixing process is a device to keep the egg placed centrally in the FE up to the first cleavage, and after the first cleavage and beyond to anchor the blastomeres to the FE so that the FE can be used as a scaffold for morphogenesis. Electron microscopy also suggests that the inner layer of the FE, which is derived from the contents of cortical granules, reinforces the adhesion of the fixing processes to the FE. Immuno-electron microscopy, using an antibody against sea urchin hyaline layer, showed that the inner layer of the FE of starfish eggs and the hyaline layer of sea urchin eggs, which are both derived from cortical granules, contain some common elements.


Subject(s)
Blastomeres/physiology , Starfish/embryology , Animals , Cleavage Stage, Ovum/physiology , Fertilization , Microscopy, Electron , Microscopy, Immunoelectron/methods , Microvilli , Morphogenesis , Starfish/ultrastructure , Tissue Fixation , Zygote/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...