Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Brain Inj ; 36(8): 939-947, 2022 07 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35904331

ABSTRACT

This prospective multicenter study evaluated differences in concussion severity and functional outcome using glial and neuronal biomarkers glial Fibrillary Acidic (GFAP) and Ubiquitin C-terminal Hydrolase (UCH-L1) in children and youth involved in non-sport related trauma, organized sports, and recreational activities. Children and youth presenting to three Level 1 trauma centersfollowing blunt head trauma with a GCS 15 with a verified diagnosis of a concussion were enrolled within 6 hours of injury. Traumatic intracranial lesions on CT scan and functional outcome within 3 months of injury were evaluated. 131 children and youth with concussion were enrolled, 81 in the no sports group, 22 in the organized sports group and 28 in the recreational activities group. Median GFAP levels were 0.18, 0.07, and 0.39 ng/mL in the respective groups (p = 0.014). Median UCH-L1 levels were 0.18, 0.27, and 0.32 ng/mL respectively (p = 0.025). A CT scan of the head was performed in 110 (84%) patients. CT was positive in 5 (7%), 4 (27%), and 5 (20%) patients, respectively. The AUC for GFAP for detecting +CT was 0.84 (95%CI 0.75-0.93) and for UCH-L1 was 0.82 (95%CI 0.71-0.94). In those without CT lesions, elevations in UCH-L1 were significantly associated with unfavorable 3-month outcome. Concussions in the 3 groups were of similar severity and functional outcome. GFAP and UCH-L1 were both associated with severity of concussion and intracranial lesions, with the most elevated concentrations in recreational activities .


Subject(s)
Brain Concussion , Head Injuries, Closed , Adolescent , Biomarkers , Brain Concussion/diagnostic imaging , Child , Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein , Humans , Prospective Studies
2.
BMJ Paediatr Open ; 3(1): e000473, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31531405

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the ability of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase (UCH-L1) to detect concussion in children and adult trauma patients with a normal mental status and assess biomarker concentrations over time as gradients of injury in concussive and non-concussive head and body trauma. DESIGN: Large prospective cohort study. SETTING: Three level I trauma centres in the USA. PARTICIPANTS: Paediatric and adult trauma patients of all ages, with and without head trauma, presenting with a normal mental status (Glasgow Coma Scale score of 15) within 4 hours of injury. Rigorous screening for concussive symptoms was conducted. Of 3462 trauma patients screened, 751 were enrolled and 712 had biomarker data. Repeated blood sampling was conducted at 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, 156, 168 and 180 hours postinjury in adults. MAIN OUTCOMES: Detection of concussion and gradients of injury in children versus adults by comparing three groups of patients: (1) those with concussion; (2) those with head trauma without overt signs of concussion (non-concussive head trauma controls) and (3) those with peripheral (body) trauma without head trauma or concussion (non-concussive body trauma controls). RESULTS: A total of 1904 samples from 712 trauma patients were analysed. Within 4 hours of injury, there were incremental increases in levels of both GFAP and UCH-L1 from non-concussive body trauma (lowest), to mild elevations in non-concussive head trauma, to highest levels in patients with concussion. In concussion patients, GFAP concentrations were significantly higher compared with body trauma controls (p<0.001) and with head trauma controls (p<0.001) in both children and adults, after controlling for multiple comparisons. However, for UCH-L1, there were no significant differences between concussion patients and head trauma controls (p=0.894) and between body trauma and head trauma controls in children. The AUC for initial GFAP levels to detect concussion was 0.80 (0.73-0.87) in children and 0.76 (0.71-0.80) in adults. This differed significantly from UCH-L1 with AUCs of 0.62 (0.53-0.72) in children and 0.69 (0.64-0.74) in adults. CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of trauma patients with normal mental status, GFAP outperformed UCH-L1 in detecting concussion in both children and adults. Blood levels of GFAP and UCH-L1 showed incremental elevations across three injury groups: from non-concussive body trauma, to non-concussive head trauma, to concussion. However, UCH-L1 was expressed at much higher levels than GFAP in those with non-concussive trauma, particularly in children. Elevations in both biomarkers in patients with non-concussive head trauma may be reflective of a subconcussive brain injury. This will require further study.

3.
J Neurotrauma ; 34(13): 2132-2140, 2017 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28158951

ABSTRACT

This study examined the performance of serum ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase (UCH-L1) in detecting traumatic intracranial lesions on computed tomography (CT) scan (+CT) in children and youth with mild and moderate TBI (mmTBI) and assessed its performance in trauma control patients without head trauma. This prospective cohort study enrolled children and youth presenting to three level 1 trauma centers after blunt head trauma and a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 9-15 as well as trauma control patients with GCS 15 that did not have blunt head trauma. The primary outcome measure was the presence of intracranial lesions on initial CT scan. Blood samples were obtained in all patients within 6 h of injury and measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay ELISA for UCH-L1 (ng/mL). A total of 256 children and youth were enrolled in the study and had serum samples drawn within 6 h of injury for analysis; 196 had blunt head trauma and 60 were trauma controls. CT scan of the head was performed in 151 patients and traumatic intracranial lesions on CT scan were evident in 17 (11%), all of whom had a GCS of 13-15. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for UCH-L1 in detecting children and youth with traumatic intracranial lesions on CT was 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-0.93). In those presenting with a GCS of 15, the AUC for detecting lesions was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.72-0.94). Similarly, in children under 5 years of age, the AUC was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.59-1.00). Performance for detecting intracranial lesions at a UCH-L1 cut-off level of 0.18 ng/mL yielded a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 47%, and a negative predictive value of 100%. UCH-L1 showed good performance in infants and toddlers younger than 5 years and performed well in children and youth with a GCS score of 15. Before clinical application, further study in larger cohort of children and youth with mild TBI is warranted.


Subject(s)
Brain Concussion/diagnosis , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Head Injuries, Closed/diagnosis , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Ubiquitin Thiolesterase/blood , Adolescent , Biomarkers/blood , Brain Concussion/blood , Brain Concussion/diagnostic imaging , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Glasgow Coma Scale , Head Injuries, Closed/blood , Head Injuries, Closed/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Young Adult
4.
JAMA Neurol ; 73(5): 551-60, 2016 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27018834

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) have been widely studied and show promise for clinical usefulness in suspected traumatic brain injury (TBI) and concussion. Understanding their diagnostic accuracy over time will help translate them into clinical practice. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the temporal profiles of GFAP and UCH-L1 in a large cohort of trauma patients seen at the emergency department and to assess their diagnostic accuracy over time, both individually and in combination, for detecting mild to moderate TBI (MMTBI), traumatic intracranial lesions on head computed tomography (CT), and neurosurgical intervention. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective cohort study enrolled adult trauma patients seen at a level I trauma center from March 1, 2010, to March 5, 2014. All patients underwent rigorous screening to determine whether they had experienced an MMTBI (blunt head trauma with loss of consciousness, amnesia, or disorientation and a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 9-15). Of 3025 trauma patients assessed, 1030 met eligibility criteria for enrollment, and 446 declined participation. Initial blood samples were obtained in 584 patients enrolled within 4 hours of injury. Repeated blood sampling was conducted at 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, 156, 168, and 180 hours after injury. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Diagnosis of MMTBI, presence of traumatic intracranial lesions on head CT scan, and neurosurgical intervention. RESULTS: A total of 1831 blood samples were drawn from 584 patients (mean [SD] age, 40 [16] years; 62.0% [362 of 584] male) over 7 days. Both GFAP and UCH-L1 were detectible within 1 hour of injury. GFAP peaked at 20 hours after injury and slowly declined over 72 hours. UCH-L1 rose rapidly and peaked at 8 hours after injury and declined rapidly over 48 hours. Over the course of 1 week, GFAP demonstrated a diagnostic range of areas under the curve for detecting MMTBI of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.69-0.77) to 0.94 (95% CI, 0.78-1.00), and UCH-L1 demonstrated a diagnostic range of 0.30 (95% CI, 0.02-0.50) to 0.67 (95% CI, 0.53-0.81). For detecting intracranial lesions on CT, the diagnostic ranges of areas under the curve were 0.80 (95% CI, 0.67-0.92) to 0.97 (95% CI, 0.93-1.00)for GFAP and 0.31 (95% CI, 0-0.63) to 0.77 (95% CI, 0.68-0.85) for UCH-L1. For distinguishing patients with and without a neurosurgical intervention, the range for GFAP was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.79-1.00) to 1.00 (95% CI, 1.00-1.00), and the range for UCH-L1 was 0.50 (95% CI, 0-1.00) to 0.92 (95% CI, 0.83-1.00). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: GFAP performed consistently in detecting MMTBI, CT lesions, and neurosurgical intervention across 7 days. UCH-L1 performed best in the early postinjury period.


Subject(s)
Brain Concussion/blood , Brain Concussion/diagnostic imaging , Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein/blood , Ubiquitin Thiolesterase/blood , Wounds and Injuries/blood , Wounds and Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Area Under Curve , Brain Concussion/complications , Brain Concussion/surgery , Cohort Studies , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Glasgow Outcome Scale , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Time Factors , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Wounds and Injuries/complications , Wounds and Injuries/surgery , Young Adult
5.
J Neurotrauma ; 33(1): 58-64, 2016 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25752485

ABSTRACT

In adults, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) has been shown to out-perform S100ß in detecting intracranial lesions on computed tomography (CT) in mild traumatic brain injury (TBI). This study examined the ability of GFAP and S100ß to detect intracranial lesions on CT in children and youth involved in trauma. This prospective cohort study enrolled a convenience sample of children and youth at two pediatric and one adult Level 1 trauma centers following trauma, including both those with and without head trauma. Serum samples were obtained within 6 h of injury. The primary outcome was the presence of traumatic intracranial lesions on CT scan. There were 155 pediatric trauma patients enrolled, 114 (74%) had head trauma and 41 (26%) had no head trauma. Out of the 92 patients who had a head CT, eight (9%) had intracranial lesions. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for distinguishing head trauma from no head trauma for GFAP was 0.84 (0.77-0.91) and for S100ß was 0.64 (0.55-0.74; p<0.001). Similarly, the AUC for predicting intracranial lesions on CT for GFAP was 0.85 (0.72-0.98) versus 0.67 (0.50-0.85) for S100ß (p=0.013). Additionally, we assessed the performance of GFAP and S100ß in predicting intracranial lesions in children ages 10 years or younger and found the AUC for GFAP was 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86-1.00) and for S100ß was 0.72 (0.36-1.00). In children younger than 5 years old, the AUC for GFAP was 1.00 (95% CI 0.99-1.00) and for S100ß 0.62 (0.15-1.00). In this population with mild TBI, GFAP out-performed S100ß in detecting head trauma and predicting intracranial lesions on head CT. This study is among the first published to date to prospectively compare these two biomarkers in children and youth with mild TBI.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries/blood , Brain Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein/blood , S100 Calcium Binding Protein beta Subunit/blood , Adolescent , Adult , Biomarkers/blood , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Trauma Centers , Young Adult
6.
Acad Emerg Med ; 22(11): 1274-82, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26469937

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the performance of serum glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in detecting traumatic intracranial lesions on computed tomography (CT) scan in children and youth with mild and moderate traumatic brain injury (TBI) and assessed its performance in trauma control patients without head trauma. METHODS: This prospective cohort study enrolled children and youth presenting to three Level I trauma centers following blunt head trauma with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores of 9 to 15, as well as trauma control patients with GCS scores of 15 who did not have blunt head trauma. The primary outcome measure was the presence of intracranial lesions on initial CT scan. Blood samples were obtained in all patients within 6 hours of injury and measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for GFAP (ng/mL). RESULTS: A total of 257 children and youth were enrolled in the study and had serum samples drawn within 6 hours of injury for analysis: 197 had blunt head trauma and 60 were trauma controls. CT scan of the head was performed in 152 patients and traumatic intracranial lesions on CT scan were evident in 18 (11%), all of whom had GCS scores of 13 to 15. When serum levels of GFAP were compared in children and youth with traumatic intracranial lesions on CT scan to those without CT lesions, median GFAP levels were significantly higher in those with intracranial lesions (1.01, interquartile range [IQR] = 0.59 to 1.48) than those without lesions (0.18, IQR = 0.06 to 0.47). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for GFAP in detecting children and youth with traumatic intracranial lesions on CT was 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.71 to 0.93). In those presenting with GCS scores of 15, the AUC for detecting lesions was 0.80 (95% CI = 0.68 to 0.92). Similarly, in children under 5 years old the AUC was 0.83 (95% CI = 0.56 to 1.00). Performance for detecting intracranial lesions at a GFAP cutoff level of 0.15 ng/mL yielded a sensitivity of 94%, a specificity of 47%, and a negative predictive value of 98%. CONCLUSIONS: In children and youth of all ages, GFAP measured within 6 hours of injury was associated with traumatic intracranial lesions on CT and with severity of TBI. Further study is required to validate these findings before clinical application.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries/blood , Brain Injuries/physiopathology , Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein/blood , Head Injuries, Closed/blood , Head Injuries, Closed/physiopathology , Adolescent , Biomarkers , Brain Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Child , Child, Preschool , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Female , Glasgow Coma Scale , Head Injuries, Closed/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , ROC Curve , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Trauma Centers
7.
J Neurotrauma ; 31(22): 1815-22, 2014 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24903744

ABSTRACT

Both glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and S100ß are found in glial cells and are released into serum following a traumatic brain injury (TBI), however, the clinical utility of S100ß as a biomarker has been questioned because of its release from bone. This study examined the ability of GFAP and S100ß to detect intracranial lesions on computed tomography (CT) in trauma patients and also assessed biomarker performance in patients with fractures and extracranial injuries on head CT. This prospective cohort study enrolled a convenience sample of adult trauma patients at a Level I trauma center with and without mild or moderate traumatic brain injury (MMTBI). Serum samples were obtained within 4 h of injury. The primary outcome was the presence of traumatic intracranial lesions on CT scan. There were 397 general trauma patients enrolled: 209 (53%) had a MMTBI and 188 (47%) had trauma without MMTBI. Of the 262 patients with a head CT, 20 (8%) had intracranial lesions. There were 137 (35%) trauma patients who sustained extracranial fractures below the head to the torso and extremities. Levels of S100ß were significantly higher in patients with fractures, compared with those without fractures (p<0.001) whether MMTBI was present or not. However, GFAP levels were not significantly affected by the presence of fractures (p>0.05). The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) for predicting intracranial lesions on CT for GFAP was 0.84 (0.73-0.95) and for S100ß was 0.78 (0.67-0.89). However, in the presence of extracranial fractures, the AUC for GFAP increased to 0.93 (0.86-1.00) and for S100ß decreased to 0.75 (0.61-0.88). In a general trauma population, GFAP out-performed S100ß in detecting intracranial CT lesions, particularly in the setting of extracranial fractures.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers/blood , Brain Injuries/diagnosis , Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein/blood , S100 Calcium Binding Protein beta Subunit/blood , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Area Under Curve , Brain Injuries/blood , Cohort Studies , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Female , Fractures, Bone/blood , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , ROC Curve , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Young Adult
8.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 95(12): 2435-43, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24814561

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the medical literature and comprehensively summarize clinical research done on rehabilitation with a novel portable and noninvasive electrical stimulation device called the cranial nerve noninvasive neuromodulator in patients suffering from nervous system disorders. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from 1966 to March 2013. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included if they recruited adult patients with peripheral and central nervous system disorders, were treated with the cranial nerve noninvasive neuromodulator device, and were assessed with objective measures of function. DATA EXTRACTION: After title and abstract screening of potential articles, full texts were independently reviewed to identify articles that met inclusion criteria. DATA SYNTHESIS: The search identified 12 publications: 5 were critically reviewed, and of these 5, 2 were combined in a meta-analysis. There were no randomized controlled studies identified, and the meta-analysis was based on pre-post studies. Most of the patients were individuals with a chronic balance dysfunction. The pooled results demonstrated significant improvements in the dynamic gait index postintervention with a mean difference of 3.45 (95% confidence interval, 1.75-5.15; P<.001), Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale with a mean difference of 16.65 (95% confidence interval, 7.65-25.47; P<.001), and Dizziness Handicap Inventory with improvements of -26.07 (95% confidence interval, -35.78 to -16.35; P<.001). Included studies suffered from small sample sizes, lack of randomization, absence of blinding, use of referral populations, and variability in treatment schedules and follow-up rates. CONCLUSIONS: Given these limitations, the results of the meta-analysis must be interpreted cautiously. Further investigation using rigorous randomized controlled trials is needed to evaluate this promising rehabilitation tool for nervous system disorders.


Subject(s)
Cranial Nerves , Electric Stimulation Therapy/instrumentation , Nervous System Diseases/rehabilitation , Gait , Humans , Nervous System Diseases/complications , Postural Balance , Sensation Disorders/etiology , Sensation Disorders/rehabilitation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...