Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Scand J Rheumatol ; 50(6): 469-474, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33851896

ABSTRACT

Objective: We undertook a comprehensive cross-sectional analysis of a multicentred Australian cohort of systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients to evaluate the associations of anti-Ro52/TRIM21 with SSc pulmonary involvement.Method: The study included 596 patients from the Australian Scleroderma Cohort Study database whose anti-Ro52/TRIM21 status was known. Anti-Ro52/TRIM21 was measured via line immunoassay. Data on demographic variables, autoantibody profiles, presence of interstitial lung disease (ILD), presence of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), oxygen saturation, Six-Minute Walk Test distance, Borg dyspnoea score, and lung function tests were extracted. SPSS software was used to examine associations using univariate and multivariate analyses.Results: Anti-Ro52/TRIM21 was present in 34.4% of SSc patients. In the cross-sectional analysis, anti-Ro52/TRIM21 was independently associated with PAH [odds ratio 1.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-2.90], but not ILD or other surrogate measures of pulmonary involvement such as average patient oxygen saturation. The antibody, however, was also associated with a higher forced vital capacity/diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide ratio. Prospectively, anti-Ro52/TRIM21 was also associated with an increased risk of death in patients with SSc (hazard ratio 1.62, 95% CI 1.11-2.35), independent of confounding factors. The primary cause of death appeared to be related to PAH and/or ILD, and anti-Ro52/TRIM21 was associated with PAH-related complications.Conclusion: Anti-Ro52/TRIM21 was independently associated with PAH and mortality in SSc patients. Future longitudinal studies are recommended to investigate the timing and pathogenic mechanisms of this autoantibody in PAH.


Subject(s)
Autoantibodies , Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension , Scleroderma, Systemic , Australia/epidemiology , Autoantibodies/analysis , Cohort Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension/epidemiology , Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension/mortality , Scleroderma, Systemic/therapy
2.
Tech Coloproctol ; 25(3): 267-278, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33386511

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus has been commonly associated with poor surgical outcomes. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the impact of diabetes on postoperative complications following colorectal surgery. METHODS: Medline, Embase and China National Knowledge Infrastructure electronic databases were reviewed from inception until May 9th 2020. Meta-analysis of proportions and comparative meta-analysis were conducted. Studies that involved patients with diabetes mellitus having colorectal surgery, with the inclusion of patients without a history of diabetes as a control, were selected. The outcomes measured were postoperative complications. RESULTS: Fifty-five studies with a total of 666,886 patients comprising 93,173 patients with diabetes and 573,713 patients without diabetes were included. Anastomotic leak (OR 2.407; 95% CI 1.837-3.155; p < 0.001), surgical site infections (OR 1.979; 95% CI 1.636-2.394; p < 0.001), urinary complications (OR 1.687; 95% CI 1.210-2.353; p = 0.002), and hospital readmissions (OR 1.406; 95% CI 1.349-1.466; p < 0.001) were found to be significantly higher amongst patients with diabetes following colorectal surgery. The incidence of septicemia, intra-abdominal infections, mechanical failure of wound healing comprising wound dehiscence and disruption, pulmonary complications, reoperation, and 30-day mortality were not significantly increased. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis and systematic review found a higher incidence of postoperative complications including anastomotic leaks and a higher re-admission rate. Risk profiling for diabetes prior to surgery and perioperative optimization for patients with diabetes is critical to improve surgical outcomes.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Surgery , Diabetes Mellitus , Digestive System Surgical Procedures , Anastomotic Leak/epidemiology , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Humans , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology
3.
Acta Paediatr ; 104(467): 85-95, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26265016

ABSTRACT

AIM: To synthesise the evidence on the association between duration and exclusivity of breastfeeding and the risk of acute otitis media (AOM). METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis following searching of PubMed, CINAHL and EMBASE electronic databases. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies, all from the USA or Europe, met the inclusion criteria. In the pooled analyses, any form of breastfeeding was found to be protective for AOM in the first 2 years of life. Exclusive breastfeeding for the first 6 months was associated with the greatest protection (OR 0.57 95% CI 0.44, 0.75), followed by 'more vs less' breastfeeding (OR 0.67; 0.59, 0.76) and 'ever vs never' breastfeeding (OR 0.67; 0.56, 0.80). CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis provides evidence that breastfeeding protects against AOM until 2 years of age, but protection is greater for exclusive breastfeeding and breastfeeding of longer duration. Exclusive breastfeeding during the first 6 months was associated with around a 43% reduction in ever having AOM in the first 2 years of life. After 2 years of age, there is no evidence that breastfeeding protects against AOM; however, there were few studies and the evidence quality was low.


Subject(s)
Breast Feeding , Otitis Media/epidemiology , Acute Disease , Child , Child, Preschool , Europe/epidemiology , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Risk Factors , Time Factors , United States/epidemiology
4.
Acta Paediatr ; 104(467): 38-53, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26192405

ABSTRACT

AIM: To systematically review the association between breastfeeding and childhood allergic disease. METHODS: Predetermined inclusion/exclusion criteria identified 89 articles from PubMed, CINAHL and EMBASE databases. Meta-analyses performed for categories of breastfeeding and allergic outcomes. Meta-regression explored heterogeneity. RESULTS: More vs. less breastfeeding (duration) was associated with reduced risk of asthma for children (5-18 years), particularly in medium-/low-income countries and with reduced risk of allergic rhinitis ≤5 years, but this estimate had high heterogeneity and low quality. Exclusive breastfeeding for 3-4 months was associated with reduced risk of eczema ≤2 years (estimate principally from cross-sectional studies of low methodological quality). No association found between breastfeeding and food allergy (estimate had high heterogeneity and low quality). Meta-regression found differences between study outcomes may be attributable to length of breastfeeding recall, study design, country income and date of study inception. Some of the protective effect of breastfeeding for asthma may be related to recall bias in studies of lesser methodological quality. CONCLUSION: There is some evidence that breastfeeding is protective for asthma (5-18 years). There is weaker evidence for a protective effect for eczema ≤2 years and allergic rhinitis ≤5 years of age, with greater protection for asthma and eczema in low-income countries.


Subject(s)
Asthma/epidemiology , Breast Feeding , Eczema/epidemiology , Food Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Rhinitis, Allergic/epidemiology , Adolescent , Asthma/prevention & control , Case-Control Studies , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Time Factors
5.
Acta Paediatr ; 104(467): 62-84, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26206663

ABSTRACT

AIM: To synthesise the current evidence for the associations between breastfeeding and dental caries, with respect to specific windows of early childhood caries risk. METHODS: Systematic review, meta-analyses and narrative synthesis following searches of PubMed, CINAHL and EMBASE databases. RESULTS: Sixty-three papers included. Children exposed to longer versus shorter duration of breastfeeding up to age 12 months (more versus less breastfeeding), had a reduced risk of caries (OR 0.50; 95%CI 0.25, 0.99, I(2) 86.8%). Children breastfed >12 months had an increased risk of caries when compared with children breastfed <12 months (seven studies (OR 1.99; 1.35, 2.95, I(2) 69.3%). Amongst children breastfed >12 months, those fed nocturnally or more frequently had a further increased caries risk (five studies, OR 7.14; 3.14, 16.23, I(2) 77.1%). There was a lack of studies on children aged >12 months simultaneously assessing caries risk in breastfed, bottle-fed and children not bottle or breastfed, alongside specific breastfeeding practices, consuming sweet drinks and foods, and oral hygiene practices limiting our ability to tease out the risks attributable to each. CONCLUSION: Breastfeeding in infancy may protect against dental caries. Further research needed to understand the increased risk of caries in children breastfed after 12 months.


Subject(s)
Breast Feeding , Dental Caries/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Dietary Sucrose/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Oral Hygiene , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...