Cost and outcomes of Hospital-based Usual cAre versus Tele-monitor self-directed Rehabilitation (HUATR) in patients with total knee arthroplasty: A randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of telemonitored self-directed rehabilitation (TR) compared with hospital-based rehabilitation (HBR) for patients with total knee arthroplasty (TKA). DESIGN: In this randomized, non-inferiority clinical trial, 114 patients with primary TKA who were able to walk independently preoperatively were randomized to receive HBR (n = 58) or TR (n = 56). HBR comprised at least five physical therapy sessions over 10 weeks. TR comprised a therapist-led onboarding session, followed by a 10-week unsupervised home-based exercise program, with asynchronous monitoring of rehabilitation outcomes using a telemonitoring system. The primary outcome was fast-paced gait speed at 12 weeks, with a non-inferiority margin of 0.10 m/s. For economic analysis, quality-adjusted-life-years (QALY) was the primary economic outcome (non-inferiority margin, 0.027 points). RESULTS: In Bayesian analyses, TR had >95% posterior probability of being non-inferior to HBR in gait speed (week-12 adjusted TR-HBR difference, 0.02 m/s; 95%CrI, -0.05 to 0.10 m/s; week-24 difference, 0.01 m/s; 95%CrI, -0.07 to 0.10 m/s) and QALY (0.006 points; 95%CrI, -0.006 to 0.018 points). When evaluated from a societal perspective, TR was associated with lower mean intervention cost (adjusted TR-HBR difference, -S$227; 95%CrI, -112 to -330) after 24 weeks, with 82% probability of being cost-effective compared with HBR at a willingness to pay of S$0/unit of effect for the QALYs. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with uncomplicated TKAs and relatively good preoperative physical function, home-based, self-directed TR was non-inferior to and more cost-effective than HBR over a 24-week follow-up period. TR should be considered for this patient subgroup.

Digital bathroom scales with open source software provide valid dynamic ground reaction force data for assessment and biofeedback.

BACKGROUND: Measuring dynamic vertical ground reaction force allows for assessment of important clinical and physical capacity factors such as weight bearing asymmetry, force distribution, and rate of force development. However, current technologies for accurately assessing ground reaction force are typically expensive. RESEARCH QUESTION: The aim of this study was to examine the validity and reliability of obtaining static and dynamic ground reaction force data from low-cost modified digital bathroom scales. METHODS: Four modified bathroom scales, two units each of two different brands, were examined. Repeated mechanical loading trials were performed with known loads ranging from 0.01 to 65 kg, with acquired data compared against the known loading to calculate accuracy, hysteresis, and non-linearity. Dynamic trials consisting of 5 times sit-to-stand and weight-shifting were performed by 32 adults. Absolute and relative agreement intraclass correlation coefficient, and Pearson's and Spearman's correlations were performed to determine validity and reliability for the mechanical tests. Bland-Altmann plots were created for each comparison. Mean absolute error (MAE) and unbiased cross-correlation were performed on the dynamic data, comparing the calibrated data to the known values from a Bertec force platform. RESULTS: Hysteresis and non-linearity were excellent (<0.2 % full-scale), and mechanical test results showed excellent reliability and validity. Cross-correlation results for the dynamic data were excellent, however MAE for the more rapid sit-to-stand task was higher than the slower weight-shifting test. This may have been due to the low default sampling rate for the lowest noise setting of the HX711 amplifier (10 Hz). SIGNIFICANCE: In summary, our results suggest that digital bathroom scales can be easily and inexpensively modified to obtain accurate vertical ground reaction force data, with sensitivity to detect changes of as little as 0.01 kg.

Immediate effects of valgus bracing on knee joint moments during walking in knee-healthy individuals: Potential modifying effects of body height.

BACKGROUND: The goal of valgus knee brace treatment is to reduce medial knee joint loading during walking, often indicated by external knee adduction moment (KAM) measures. However, existing healthy-subjects studies have been equivocal in demonstrating KAM reduction with valgus knee bracing. RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the immediate effects of valgus bracing at different tension levels on KAM during walking at a controlled speed and does body height modify the brace-KAM associations? METHODS: Data from 32 knee-healthy participants were analysed in this randomized crossover trial. Participants performed walking trials at controlled speed (1.3 ± 0.065 m/s) both with and without an Ossür Unloader One® brace. During the bracing condition, valgus tension was incrementally increased, from zero tension to normal tension and to maximum tolerable tension. RESULTS: Valgus bracing minimally increased knee flexion at heel-strike (P < 0.001) in a dose-dependent manner and minimally reduced gait velocity (∼0.015m/s) across all tension levels. Valgus bracing, overall, did not significantly reduce the various KAM measures. However, brace use at maximal tension was associated with a 0.04Nm/kg (9.2 %) increase in first peak KAM amongst participants with a body height of 1.75 m and a 0.03Nm/kg (7.6 %) decrease in first peak KAM amongst participants with a body height of 1.55 m. SIGNIFICANCE: Valgus bracing did not reduce the various KAM measures during walking; however, body height may play a moderating role. Given knee brace sizes vary more in circumference than length, this result may be due to the ratio between effective moment arm length relative to limb length. A deeper understanding of the potential neuro-biomechanical effects of valgus knee bracing and how these effects are potentially modified by body height may be critical to the design of effective knee braces.

Test-retest reliability and variability of knee adduction moment peak, impulse and loading rate during walking.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported good test-retest reliability for peak knee adduction moment (KAM) during walking. However, reliability of other KAM measurements has not been established. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the test-retest reliability of peak KAM, KAM impulse, and KAM loading rate measurements during walking in knee-healthy individuals? METHODS: Data from 32 knee-healthy participants were analysed in this test-retest reliability study. Various KAM measurements were reported for two sessions with kinematic and kinetic data obtained from a motion capture system synchronised with force plates, with a median of 1 week between sessions. RESULTS: For all KAM measures, intra-class correlation coefficients were above 0.90 and their lower bound 95 % confidence limits exceeded 0.81. However, absolute measurement variability differed across measures, with normalized SEM (8 %-15 %), normalized MDC95 (20 %-40 %), intra-session MAD (10 %-18 %), and inter-session MAD (12 %-22 %) varying over a 2-fold range. Overall and first peak KAM, KAM impulse over 50 % stance, and KAM loading rate (15 frame window) showed ≤10 % and ≤15 % intra- and inter-session MAD, respectively. SIGNIFICANCE: This study provided previously undefined test-retest reliability estimates for various KAM measures during walking. Researchers and clinicians should not assume that the various aspects of the KAM curve share similar reliability.