In vitro comparison of guided versus freehand implant placement: use of a new combined TRIOS surface scanning, Implant Studio, CBCT, and stereolithographic virtually planned and guided technique.

Implant placement requires precise planning and execution to avoid collision with critical anatomical structures. Technology advances may improve placement outcomes. The purpose of this study was to trial and measure in an in vitro environment the accuracy of placing a single dental implant in the planned position using a specific guided surgery technique compared with a freehand surgery technique. The dental model of a patient missing tooth 16 was printed 30 times (EnvisionTEC 3Dent). Each print was scanned (TRIOS color scanner) to create a 3D surface model, and radiographed (Gendex CB-500) to create cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) data. The surface data and CBCT data were merged (Implant Studio software), and a Straumann RC bone level Ø 4.1 × 8 mm implant placement was planned. A surgical guide was printed (Stratasys OrthoDesk) for each case (n = 30). Simulated cases were assigned to Group A (guided) or Group B (freehand, where the fabricated guide was discarded). Implants were placed, and the models rescanned (TRIOS). The new data was superimposed on the original data, and the surgical implant location compared with the planned position for each model (Convince software) by a researcher blinded to group allocation. Differences in angulation (degrees); shoulder, apex, and depth displacements (mm); and direction of displacement were assessed with Mann-Whitney U and Fisher exact tests. Data was expressed as medians bounded by interquartile ranges (IQRs). Implant angulation and apical displacement were significantly closer to the planned position in the guided group compared with the freehand group (3.91 degrees: IQR 2.45 to 5.38 degrees vs 8.82 degrees: IQR 4.84 to 9.84 degrees, P = 0.005; and 0.87 mm: IQR 0.53 to 1.11 mm vs 1.48 mm: IQR 1.14 to 1.72 mm, P < 0.001, respectively). Implant shoulder displacement, depth displacements, and direction of displacement did not differ between the groups. Within the in vitro environment, merged 3D surface scan data and 3D CBCT scan data can be used to plan and guide implant placement with greater accuracy than with the freehand technique.

In vitro fracture resistance of endodontically treated central incisors with varying ferrule heights and configurations.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The in vitro effectiveness of a uniform circumferential ferrule has been established in the literature; however, the effect of a nonuniform circumferential ferrule height on fracture resistance is unknown. PURPOSE: This in vitro study investigated the resistance to static loading of endodontically treated teeth with uniform and nonuniform ferrule configurations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty extracted intact maxillary human central incisors were randomly assigned to 1 of 5 groups: CRN, no root canal treatment (RCT), restored with a crown; RCT/CRN, no dowel/core, restored with a crown; 2 FRL, 2-mm ferrule, cast dowel/core and crown; 0.5/2 FRL, nonuniform ferrule (2 mm buccal and lingual, 0.5 mm proximal), cast dowel/core and crown; and 0 FRL, no ferrule, cast dowel/core and crown. The teeth were prepared to standardized specifications and stored for 72 hours in 100% humidity prior to testing. Testing was conducted with a universal testing machine with the application of a static load, and the load (N) at failure was recorded. Statistical analysis was performed with a 1-way analysis of variance and the Tukey Honestly Significant Difference test (alpha=.05). The mode of fracture was noted by visual inspection for all specimens. RESULTS: There was strong evidence of group differences in mean fracture strength ( P <.0001). Following adjustment for all pairwise group comparisons, it was found that the lack of a ferrule resulted in a significantly lower mean fracture strength (0 FRL: 264.93 +/- 78.33 N) relative to all other groups. The presence of a nonuniform (0.5 to 2-mm vertical height) ferrule (0.5/2 FRL: 426.64 +/- 88.33 N) resulted in a significant decrease ( P =.0001) in mean fracture strength when compared with the uniform 2-mm vertical ferrule (2 FRL: 587.23 +/- 110.25 N), the group without RCT (CRN: 583.67 +/- 86.09 N), and the RCT-treated tooth with a crown alone (CRN/RCT: 571.04 +/- 154.86 N). The predominant mode of failure was an oblique fracture extending from the lingual margin to the facial surface just below the insertion of the tooth into the acrylic resin. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrated that central incisors restored with cast dowel/core and crowns with a 2-mm uniform ferrule were more fracture resistant compared to central incisors with nonuniform (0.5 to 2 mm) ferrule heights. Both the 2-mm ferrule and nonuniform ferrule groups were more fracture resistant than the group that lacked a ferrule.